| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | #16Humble Atascocita (4-3) 2319 |
53% (+1) | W 28-17 | 2589 | +19.0 | −24.6 | +0.91 | — |
| 2 | 70% (+8) | W 42-24 | 2817 | +30.9 | −21.7 | +0.87 | — | |
| 3 | @Katy Tompkins (3-3) 1870 |
> 98% (+38) | W 45-21 | 2430 | +22.3 | −14.9 | +0.28 | — |
| 4 | Katy Jordan (4-2) 1745 |
94% (+26) | W 56-10 | 3033 | +34.2 | −27.1 | +0.58 | — |
| 5 | @Katy Cinco Ranch (3-3) 1510 |
97% (+34) | W 30-3 | 2243 | +5.6 | −24.2 | +0.38 | — |
| 6 | Katy Seven Lakes (0-6) 1008 |
> 98% (+62) | W 55-0 | 2364 | +16.2 | −18.4 | +0.03 | — |
| 7 | @Katy Morton Ranch (2-4) 1216 |
> 98% (+55) | W 69-6 | 2646 | +32.4 | −13.5 | +0.07 | — |
| 8 | Katy Paetow (2-4) 1511 |
> 98% (+43) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | @Katy Taylor (5-2) 1540 |
> 98% (+42) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | Katy Mayde Creek (1-5) 1114 |
> 98% (+59) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#5
was #5
Record
7-0
5-0 district
Elo
2587
#5 of 249
OVR Grade
93
#5 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
91.1
#9 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
92.6
#11 of 249 in 6A
Perf
2589
#6 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 22-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Katy’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2015
16-0
Rating 942 (100th)
#2 · 2012
16-0
Rating 898 (100th)
#3 · 2020
13-1
Rating 872 (100th)
#4 · 2007
16-0
Rating 861 (100th)
#5 · 2013
15-1
Rating 834 (99th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.