← Back
CLASS 6A · District 22-6A

Katy Tompkins Falcons

Enrollment: 3,187 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6
Rank
#72
was #72
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1710
#72 of 249
OVR Grade
79.8
#72 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@#42Klein Collins (0-0) 1936
28% (-9)
2
#32Bridgeland (0-0) 2023
21% (-13)
3
#10Katy (0-0) 2427
5% (-29)
4
@Katy Taylor (0-0) 1011
95% (+28)
5
Katy Mayde Creek (0-0) 1364
81% (+14)
7
@Katy Jordan (0-0) 1820
39% (-4)
8
Katy Cinco Ranch (0-0) 1726
48% (-1)
9
@Katy Seven Lakes (0-0) 1275
86% (+17)
10 90% (+21)
11
@Katy Paetow (0-0) 1598
62% (+5)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 22-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 10
Tigers
90.6
2427
0-0 0-0 7.8-0.2 > 98% D2
2 59
Warriors
81.4
1820
0-0 0-0 5.7-2.3 90.1% D1
3 69
Cougars
80
1726
0-0 0-0 5.1-2.9 77.9% D1
4 72
Falcons
79.8
1710
0-0 0-0 5-3 73.8% D2
5 93
Panthers
78.1
1598
0-0 0-0 4.4-3.6 44.9%
6 153
Rams
74.5
1364
0-0 0-0 2.9-5.2 8.2%
7 170
Spartans
73.2
1275
0-0 0-0 2.3-5.7 3.6%
8 181
Mavericks
71.8
1182
0-0 0-0 1.8-6.2 < 2%
9 206
Mustangs
69.2
1011
0-0 0-0 1-7 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Katy Tompkins’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2020
10-1
Rating 755 (98th)
#2 · 2021
11-2
Rating 735 (96th)
#3 · 2019
11-2
Rating 675 (91st)
#4 · 2022
8-3
Rating 665 (90th)
#5 · 2023
7-4
Rating 603 (78th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 5-5 1637 33.0 27.4 +5.6 1616 +6.3 −3.6 +9.9 1748 −1.55 +0.86 −2.41 569(68th)
2024 6-5 1538 30.5 30.5 0.0 1648 +6.4 +1.8 +4.6 1614 −1.62 +0.86 −2.48 542(59th)
2023 7-4 1823 35.2 22.6 +12.5 1526 +8.1 −5.8 +13.9 1849 −1.04 +0.88 −1.92 603(78th)
2022 8-3 2087 40.4 21.2 +19.2 1668 +15.4 −12.4 +27.9 2197 +1.36 +2.18 −0.81 665(90th)
2021 11-2 2400 41.2 17.5 +23.6 1811 +18.5 −16.4 +34.8 2371 +3.08 +3.13 −0.05 735(96th)
2020 10-1 2429 37.5 13.9 +23.5 1866 +17.1 −20.8 +37.8 2445 +4.13 +4.14 −0.01 755(98th)
2019 11-2 2077 44.3 18.9 +25.4 1665 +19.1 −12.6 +31.6 2291 +2.50 +2.63 −0.13 675(91st)
2018 10-3 1755 34.5 24.1 +10.4 1501 +5.9 −5.6 +11.5 1788 +0.81 +1.82 −1.01 587(74th)
2017 0-9 814 13.7 34.7 −21.0 1604 −11.0 +5.5 −16.5 1087 −6.14 0.00 −6.14 401(15th)
2016 2-8 1045 18.9 31.8 −12.9 1505 −7.9 +5.0 −12.9 1178 −5.45 +0.12 −5.57 434(23rd)
2015 3-7 903 11.7 32.2 −20.5 1582 −14.1 +3.2 −17.4 1066 −4.12 +0.68 −4.79 406(16th)
2014 0-10 787 4.4 43.0 −38.6 1595 −20.0 +13.9 −33.9 653 −6.98 0.00 −6.98 341(6th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.