← Back
CLASS 6A · District 22-6A

Katy Taylor Mustangs

Enrollment: 3,337 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5
Rank
#206
was #206
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1011
#206 of 249
OVR Grade
69.2
#206 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@Conroe Oak Ridge (0-0) 1217
30% (-8)
2
@Fort Bend Austin (0-0) 901
61% (+4)
3
@Katy Mayde Creek (0-0) 1364
19% (-14)
4
Katy Tompkins (0-0) 1710
5% (-28)
5
@Katy Jordan (0-0) 1820
3% (-32)
6
Katy Cinco Ranch (0-0) 1726
5% (-29)
7
@Katy Seven Lakes (0-0) 1275
25% (-11)
8 33% (-7)
9
@Katy Paetow (0-0) 1598
8% (-23)
10
#10Katy (0-0) 2427
< 2% (-57)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 22-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 10
Tigers
90.6
2427
0-0 0-0 7.8-0.2 > 98% D2
2 59
Warriors
81.4
1820
0-0 0-0 5.7-2.3 90.1% D1
3 69
Cougars
80
1726
0-0 0-0 5.1-2.9 77.9% D1
4 72
Falcons
79.8
1710
0-0 0-0 5-3 73.8% D2
5 93
Panthers
78.1
1598
0-0 0-0 4.4-3.6 44.9%
6 153
Rams
74.5
1364
0-0 0-0 2.9-5.2 8.2%
7 170
Spartans
73.2
1275
0-0 0-0 2.3-5.7 3.6%
8 181
Mavericks
71.8
1182
0-0 0-0 1.8-6.2 < 2%
9 206
Mustangs
69.2
1011
0-0 0-0 1-7 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Katy Taylor’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2019
9-6
Rating 638 (86th)
#2 · 2020
8-3
Rating 629 (84th)
#3 · 2009
6-4
Rating 598 (77th)
#4 · 2018
6-6
Rating 577 (71st)
#5 · 2004
6-4
Rating 564 (67th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 0-10 959 19.1 41.5 −22.4 1536 −8.9 +11.3 −20.2 995 −7.28 0.00 −7.28 407(16th)
2024 2-8 1108 13.3 29.9 −16.6 1537 −13.1 +1.9 −15.0 1125 −4.96 +0.08 −5.04 439(24th)
2023 5-6 1406 20.0 25.0 −5.0 1461 −8.6 −2.4 −6.2 1345 −3.37 +0.78 −4.14 499(44th)
2022 3-7 1243 20.7 33.5 −12.8 1661 −5.4 +1.1 −6.5 1337 −3.59 +0.32 −3.90 475(35th)
2021 2-8 1376 19.9 46.1 −26.2 1773 −2.9 +11.9 −14.8 1130 −3.72 +0.10 −3.82 460(31st)
2020 8-3 2016 29.8 21.3 +8.5 1725 +7.3 −11.0 +18.3 1958 +1.24 +2.03 −0.80 629(84th)
2019 9-6 2084 28.6 31.4 −2.8 1809 +7.5 −3.6 +11.1 1778 +0.89 +2.53 −1.64 638(86th)
2018 6-6 1681 18.5 19.0 −0.5 1709 −6.3 −15.7 +9.4 1736 −1.37 +1.26 −2.63 577(71st)
2017 6-4 1685 20.0 23.0 −3.0 1548 −5.3 −6.2 +0.8 1520 −0.63 +0.67 −1.30 548(62nd)
2016 9-3 1677 34.1 29.2 +4.9 1546 +6.8 −0.1 +6.9 1673 +0.32 +1.74 −1.42 564(66th)
2015 4-6 1299 22.1 23.6 −1.5 1496 −3.7 −2.1 −1.6 1460 −3.35 +0.17 −3.52 493(42nd)
2014 8-4 1532 22.8 23.8 −1.0 1490 −4.3 −4.9 +0.5 1513 −0.65 +0.91 −1.55 534(57th)
2013 2-8 1165 13.5 26.5 −13.0 1702 −7.0 −2.7 −4.3 1393 −4.24 +0.05 −4.29 475(35th)
2012 1-9 1101 24.2 40.4 −16.2 1673 −0.9 +7.0 −7.9 1302 −5.01 +0.04 −5.05 457(30th)
2011 1-9 1130 11.7 34.4 −22.7 1699 −8.8 +4.8 −13.6 1160 −5.53 +0.04 −5.56 444(26th)
2010 6-6 1614 22.5 28.9 −6.4 1588 −4.4 −2.2 −2.2 1445 −1.74 +0.95 −2.69 535(57th)
2009 6-4 1626 29.2 14.2 +15.0 1540 +3.9 −11.8 +15.7 1892 −1.12 +0.42 −1.54 598(77th)
2008 8-5 1714 19.7 22.5 −2.8 1597 −3.1 −6.0 +3.0 1574 −1.01 +1.77 −2.78 562(66th)
2007 4-6 1407 19.8 23.7 −3.9 1515 −5.1 −2.8 −2.2 1444 −3.43 +0.50 −3.94 509(48th)
2006 5-6 1392 17.0 19.5 −2.5 1580 −5.4 −5.3 −0.1 1496 −2.88 +0.54 −3.42 514(50th)
2005 4-5 1533 15.8 16.6 −0.8 1512 −7.8 −8.1 +0.3 1508 −2.52 +0.86 −3.38 536(57th)
2004 6-4 1650 19.6 16.4 +3.2 1511 −1.9 −6.6 +4.7 1618 −1.11 +1.00 −2.11 564(67th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.