← Back
CLASS 6A · District 22-6A

Katy Cinco Ranch Cougars

Enrollment: 3,669 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2
Rank
#69
was #69
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1726
#69 of 249
OVR Grade
80
#69 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@Smithson Valley
10% (-21)
2
#40Tomball (0-0) 1941
29% (-9)
3 91% (+22)
4
@Katy Paetow (0-0) 1598
63% (+5)
5
#10Katy (0-0) 2427
5% (-28)
6
@Katy Taylor (0-0) 1011
95% (+29)
7
Katy Mayde Creek (0-0) 1364
82% (+14)
8
@Katy Tompkins (0-0) 1710
52% (+1)
9
Katy Jordan (0-0) 1820
40% (-4)
11
@Katy Seven Lakes (0-0) 1275
87% (+18)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 22-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 10
Tigers
90.6
2427
0-0 0-0 7.8-0.2 > 98% D2
2 59
Warriors
81.4
1820
0-0 0-0 5.7-2.3 90.1% D1
3 69
Cougars
80
1726
0-0 0-0 5.1-2.9 77.9% D1
4 72
Falcons
79.8
1710
0-0 0-0 5-3 73.8% D2
5 93
Panthers
78.1
1598
0-0 0-0 4.4-3.6 44.9%
6 153
Rams
74.5
1364
0-0 0-0 2.9-5.2 8.2%
7 170
Spartans
73.2
1275
0-0 0-0 2.3-5.7 3.6%
8 181
Mavericks
71.8
1182
0-0 0-0 1.8-6.2 < 2%
9 206
Mustangs
69.2
1011
0-0 0-0 1-7 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Katy Cinco Ranch’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2008
11-2
Rating 689 (93rd)
#2 · 2009
13-2
Rating 684 (92nd)
#3 · 2016
11-4
Rating 658 (89th)
#4 · 2006
11-2
Rating 651 (88th)
#5 · 2017
8-2
Rating 639 (86th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 8-4 1799 30.5 25.9 +4.6 1640 +3.9 −7.1 +11.1 1777 +0.53 +1.89 −1.36 599(77th)
2024 4-6 1520 33.7 39.0 −5.3 1648 +10.3 +9.5 +0.8 1519 −2.59 +0.31 −2.90 528(54th)
2023 6-4 1536 27.5 29.1 −1.6 1423 −0.5 +3.1 −3.6 1411 −1.64 +0.87 −2.51 518(52nd)
2022 9-4 1996 42.3 30.0 +12.3 1691 +17.4 −2.4 +19.8 1994 +1.17 +2.54 −1.37 630(84th)
2021 8-5 1822 35.5 24.0 +11.5 1689 +12.5 −6.4 +18.9 1971 +0.31 +1.53 −1.22 619(82nd)
2020 1-7 1162 14.4 33.6 −19.2 1836 −7.6 −0.2 −7.4 1314 −3.65 +0.41 −4.07 468(32nd)
2019 0-10 1126 6.3 46.5 −40.2 1881 −13.4 +11.2 −24.6 885 −4.85 0.00 −4.85 417(19th)
2018 3-7 1516 28.1 35.4 −7.3 1835 +7.7 +0.1 +7.7 1691 −3.20 +0.52 −3.72 556(64th)
2017 8-2 2070 33.8 17.7 +16.1 1552 +9.6 −10.3 +19.9 1998 +0.87 +1.19 −0.32 639(86th)
2016 11-4 2194 30.5 20.3 +10.2 1650 +4.8 −12.0 +16.8 1921 +1.81 +2.93 −1.12 658(89th)
2015 9-2 1943 29.2 16.8 +12.4 1562 +3.0 −12.5 +15.5 1887 +1.25 +2.07 −0.83 614(81st)
2014 9-3 1940 26.3 18.1 +8.2 1680 +2.1 −11.8 +14.0 1849 +1.25 +2.24 −0.99 618(82nd)
2013 9-3 1969 28.8 20.0 +8.8 1673 +7.6 −10.3 +17.9 1947 +1.80 +2.51 −0.71 625(83rd)
2012 8-4 1890 31.2 24.9 +6.2 1690 +6.1 −8.7 +14.8 1869 +0.26 +1.70 −1.44 615(81st)
2011 9-3 1999 29.2 19.7 +9.6 1638 +6.3 −9.1 +15.4 1885 +0.99 +2.07 −1.08 629(84th)
2010 10-2 2001 37.7 27.2 +10.4 1634 +11.6 −4.6 +16.2 1905 +2.26 +2.85 −0.59 623(83rd)
2009 13-2 2268 34.4 18.2 +16.2 1676 +12.6 −10.5 +23.2 2079 +4.16 +4.38 −0.22 684(92nd)
2008 11-2 2139 38.8 19.7 +19.1 1744 +17.4 −11.2 +28.6 2216 +3.37 +3.58 −0.21 689(93rd)
2007 5-6 1541 19.7 22.5 −2.8 1566 −4.4 −4.7 +0.3 1508 −3.27 +0.57 −3.85 530(55th)
2006 11-2 1983 30.9 14.6 +16.3 1497 +7.9 −10.4 +18.3 1958 +1.47 +1.85 −0.38 651(88th)
2005 4-5 1694 16.2 12.3 +3.9 1392 −8.6 −10.2 +1.6 1540 −2.66 +0.78 −3.44 566(67th)
2004 8-3 1519 26.5 18.7 +7.7 1531 +5.3 −3.1 +8.3 1709 −0.52 +1.42 −1.93 558(65th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.