← Back

CLASS 6A · District 8-6A

Irving Tigers

Enrollment: 2,264 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 8

Rank

#245

was #245

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

522

#245 of 249

OVR Grade

61.8

#245 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@Corsicana	4% (-31)	—	—	—	—
2	@Denton	5% (-29)	—	—	—	—
3	Granbury (0-0) 811	23% (-12)	—	—	—	—
5	@Euless Trinity (0-0) 1856	< 2% (-53)	—	—	—	—
6	Irving MacArthur (0-0) 1019	11% (-20)	—	—	—	—
7	South Grand Prairie (0-0) 1816	< 2% (-52)	—	—	—	—
8	@Hurst Bell (0-0) 1252	5% (-29)	—	—	—	—
9	Fort Worth Haltom (0-0) 1386	3% (-35)	—	—	—	—
10	@Grand Prairie (0-0) 766	27% (-10)	—	—	—	—
11	Irving Nimitz (0-0) 487	54% (+1)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 8-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		53	Euless Trinity (1) Trojans	82 1856	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.3-0.7	> 98%	D1
2		60	South Grand Prairie (2) Warriors	81.4 1816	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.2-0.8	> 98%	D1
3		147	Fort Worth Haltom (5) Buffaloes	74.9 1386	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.6-2.4	92.1%	D2
4		173	Hurst Bell (3) Blue Raiders	72.9 1252	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-3	79.1%	D2
5		204	Irving MacArthur (6) Cardinals	69.3 1019	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.1-3.9	24.9%	—
6		229	Grand Prairie (4) Gophers	65.5 766	0-0	0-0	—	—	2-5	3.4%	—
7		245	Irving (8) Tigers	61.8 522	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-6	< 2%	—
8		247	Irving Nimitz (7) Vikings	61.3 487	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.9-6.1	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Irving’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2004

6-5

Rating 581 (72nd)

#2 · 2005

4-6

Rating 530 (55th)

#3 · 2008

5-6

Rating 515 (50th)

#4 · 2007

4-6

Rating 511 (48th)

#5 · 2013

6-5

Rating 497 (43rd)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	2-8	490	12.0	44.8	−32.8	1111	−24.1	+25.0	−49.1	272	−7.19	+0.01	−7.20	269(1st)
2024	1-9	424	15.2	46.7	−31.5	1156	−19.7	+25.7	−45.4	364	−7.85	+0.01	−7.86	275(1st)
2023	0-10	400	11.2	41.5	−30.3	1216	−23.3	+18.0	−41.3	468	−8.43	0.00	−8.43	291(2nd)
2022	1-9	539	9.2	36.3	−27.1	1254	−24.6	+13.2	−37.7	556	−6.83	+0.01	−6.84	307(3rd)
2021	2-8	538	15.1	38.8	−23.7	1157	−20.7	+16.8	−37.4	565	−6.64	+0.03	−6.67	305(3rd)
2020	0-9	524	8.7	36.1	−27.4	1240	−25.5	+13.2	−38.7	533	−7.50	0.00	−7.50	295(2nd)
2019	0-10	604	12.5	50.9	−38.4	1469	−17.2	+22.6	−39.9	503	−7.32	0.00	−7.32	304(3rd)
2018	0-10	756	12.1	41.6	−29.5	1499	−13.9	+15.8	−29.6	759	−7.77	0.00	−7.77	352(7th)
2017	3-7	1070	11.8	29.0	−17.2	1581	−12.6	+2.5	−15.1	1122	−3.68	+0.09	−3.77	429(22nd)
2016	1-8	925	14.4	37.7	−23.2	1704	−11.1	+4.7	−15.8	1105	−4.63	+0.07	−4.70	413(18th)
2015	2-8	915	11.1	30.5	−19.4	1336	−19.6	+5.0	−24.6	885	−5.86	+0.03	−5.88	382(12th)
2014	2-8	939	23.6	33.9	−10.3	1383	−8.5	+5.4	−13.9	1152	−6.11	+0.03	−6.14	421(20th)
2013	6-5	1393	25.3	25.9	−0.6	1379	−4.6	−0.5	−4.1	1398	−2.13	+0.21	−2.35	497(43rd)
2012	3-7	1035	27.6	36.2	−8.6	1368	−4.1	+9.4	−13.5	1163	−4.22	+0.15	−4.37	433(23rd)
2011	1-9	941	11.7	42.3	−30.6	1522	−13.8	+14.9	−28.6	784	−6.20	+0.04	−6.24	376(11th)
2010	1-9	1093	8.5	36.6	−28.1	1581	−16.0	+7.8	−23.8	906	−5.53	+0.04	−5.57	407(16th)
2009	1-9	1102	11.4	29.9	−18.5	1546	−15.0	+1.9	−17.0	1075	−6.07	+0.03	−6.10	430(22nd)
2008	5-6	1410	23.5	26.1	−2.6	1597	−2.0	−2.2	+0.2	1506	−2.97	+0.52	−3.49	515(50th)
2007	4-6	1402	21.9	26.8	−4.9	1592	−0.9	+0.6	−1.5	1462	−3.14	+0.57	−3.71	511(48th)
2006	0-10	1012	10.8	28.8	−18.0	1646	−11.5	+1.4	−12.9	1178	−6.42	0.00	−6.42	438(24th)
2005	4-6	1474	22.2	26.0	−3.8	1650	−0.6	−2.5	+1.8	1546	−2.58	+0.41	−2.99	530(55th)
2004	6-5	1785	27.3	24.1	+3.2	1610	+2.9	−5.4	+8.3	1707	−1.16	+1.36	−2.52	581(72nd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.