← Back

CLASS 6A · District 8-6A

Irving Nimitz Vikings

Enrollment: 2,321 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 7

Rank

#247

was #247

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

487

#247 of 249

OVR Grade

61.3

#247 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Dallas Bryan Adams	77% (+11)	—	—	—	—
2	Fort Worth Polytechnic	77% (+11)	—	—	—	—
3	@South Garland (0-0) 506	48% (-1)	—	—	—	—
5	Hurst Bell (0-0) 1252	4% (-31)	—	—	—	—
6	Fort Worth Haltom (0-0) 1386	2% (-36)	—	—	—	—
7	@Grand Prairie (0-0) 766	24% (-11)	—	—	—	—
8	Euless Trinity (0-0) 1856	< 2% (-55)	—	—	—	—
9	@Irving MacArthur (0-0) 1019	10% (-21)	—	—	—	—
10	South Grand Prairie (0-0) 1816	< 2% (-53)	—	—	—	—
11	@Irving (0-0) 522	46% (-1)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 8-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		53	Euless Trinity (1) Trojans	82 1856	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.3-0.7	> 98%	D1
2		60	South Grand Prairie (2) Warriors	81.4 1816	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.2-0.8	> 98%	D1
3		147	Fort Worth Haltom (5) Buffaloes	74.9 1386	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.6-2.4	92.1%	D2
4		173	Hurst Bell (3) Blue Raiders	72.9 1252	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-3	79.1%	D2
5		204	Irving MacArthur (6) Cardinals	69.3 1019	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.1-3.9	24.9%	—
6		229	Grand Prairie (4) Gophers	65.5 766	0-0	0-0	—	—	2-5	3.4%	—
7		245	Irving (8) Tigers	61.8 522	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-6	< 2%	—
8		247	Irving Nimitz (7) Vikings	61.3 487	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.9-6.1	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Irving Nimitz’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2005

6-4

Rating 567 (68th)

#2 · 2004

3-7

Rating 538 (58th)

#3 · 2010

6-5

Rating 530 (55th)

#4 · 2009

7-4

Rating 517 (51st)

#5 · 2015

6-5

Rating 487 (39th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	0-10	404	15.5	51.1	−35.6	1119	−20.8	+31.3	−52.1	197	−9.09	0.00	−9.09	250(1st)
2024	1-9	624	12.6	32.3	−19.7	1108	−24.2	+11.2	−35.5	613	−7.77	+0.02	−7.79	327(5th)
2023	1-9	673	17.7	43.4	−25.7	1293	−14.6	+18.6	−33.2	670	−7.11	+0.00	−7.11	342(6th)
2022	1-9	702	15.4	49.1	−33.7	1350	−14.9	+24.3	−39.2	519	−6.57	+0.01	−6.58	317(4th)
2021	5-6	1181	25.7	23.5	+2.2	1304	−7.1	−1.9	−5.2	1369	−3.64	+0.17	−3.81	470(33rd)
2020	3-6	1070	21.0	30.1	−9.1	1200	−13.8	+7.9	−21.8	956	−4.55	+0.07	−4.62	401(15th)
2019	2-8	927	16.4	38.9	−22.5	1384	−14.6	+12.3	−26.9	826	−5.63	+0.02	−5.66	376(11th)
2018	4-6	1092	26.8	30.3	−3.5	1394	−3.0	+5.5	−8.6	1286	−3.72	+0.12	−3.84	452(28th)
2017	1-9	851	18.0	37.1	−19.1	1591	−4.8	+10.6	−15.3	1117	−5.59	+0.01	−5.60	408(17th)
2016	2-8	1078	22.3	40.2	−17.9	1609	−5.1	+8.6	−13.7	1158	−4.97	+0.03	−5.00	435(23rd)
2015	6-5	1365	23.5	21.5	+2.1	1310	−7.8	−2.4	−5.4	1365	−2.42	+0.25	−2.67	487(39th)
2014	5-6	1334	27.5	27.8	−0.3	1280	−5.5	+0.2	−5.7	1357	−3.42	+0.15	−3.57	484(38th)
2013	4-6	1260	17.1	25.5	−8.4	1378	−13.1	+0.2	−13.2	1170	−3.49	+0.29	−3.78	453(29th)
2012	2-8	927	17.6	36.3	−18.7	1455	−13.7	+7.3	−21.0	974	−5.61	+0.03	−5.64	399(15th)
2011	2-8	1010	14.4	33.9	−19.5	1536	−11.7	+6.3	−18.0	1050	−5.38	+0.32	−5.70	418(19th)
2010	6-5	1606	27.3	29.8	−2.5	1529	+0.6	+1.4	−0.8	1480	−2.07	+1.04	−3.11	530(55th)
2009	7-4	1475	19.2	21.2	−2.0	1547	−6.4	−5.8	−0.6	1485	−0.80	+1.01	−1.80	517(51st)
2008	1-9	858	19.2	36.7	−17.5	1421	−9.3	+11.2	−20.5	988	−6.75	+0.06	−6.81	397(14th)
2007	0-10	1039	13.2	32.6	−19.4	1633	−7.9	+6.0	−13.9	1152	−6.75	0.00	−6.75	437(24th)
2006	3-7	1419	8.5	24.6	−16.1	1610	−13.3	−2.0	−11.3	1216	−3.88	+0.40	−4.28	479(36th)
2005	6-4	1691	23.4	20.7	+2.7	1613	+0.4	−6.7	+7.2	1679	−0.57	+0.97	−1.54	567(68th)
2004	3-7	1504	19.8	23.0	−3.2	1643	−3.2	−6.0	+2.8	1569	−3.53	+0.29	−3.82	538(58th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.