| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 89% (+20) | L 14-24 | 2211 | +7.2 | −21.3 | — | −0.26 | |
| 2 | Strake Jesuit (2-5) 1493 |
97% (+33) | W 36-6 | 2229 | +11.6 | −17.5 | +0.25 | — |
| 3 | 22% (-12) | L 20-41 | 2284 | +19.1 | −12.2 | — | −0.03 | |
| 4 | Channelview (0-7) 780 |
> 98% (+63) | W 77-0 | 2461 | +24.4 | −14.1 | +0.01 | — |
| 5 | Humble (1-6) 1472 |
98% (+35) | W 35-12 | 2083 | +6.0 | −17.4 | +0.17 | — |
| 6 | @Humble Kingwood (3-4) 1639 |
93% (+25) | W 57-2 | 2986 | +27.1 | −32.4 | +0.38 | — |
| 7 | #3Galena Park North Shore (7-0) 2816 |
14% (-17) | L 27-28 | 2706 | +26.7 | −21.6 | — | −0.02 |
| 9 | @Crosby (4-3) 1793 |
92% (+23) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | #6Sheldon CE King (6-1) 2580 |
30% (-8) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | 56% (+2) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#13
was #13
Record
4-3
3-1 district
Elo
2373
#13 of 249
OVR Grade
89.8
#13 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
87.3
#24 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
91.6
#15 of 249 in 6A
Perf
2423
#16 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 17-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Humble Summer Creek’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2024
12-3
Rating 817 (99th)
#2 · 2023
14-2
Rating 791 (99th)
#3 · 2025
12-2
Rating 780 (98th)
#4 · 2022
8-5
Rating 754 (98th)
#5 · 2021
10-4
Rating 712 (95th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.