← Back

CLASS 6A · District 17-6A

Humble Kingwood Mustangs

Enrollment: 2,838 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 7

Rank

#70

was #70

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1718

#70 of 249

OVR Grade

79.9

#70 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@Clear Creek (0-0) 1136	92% (+23)	—	—	—	—
2	Clear Falls (0-0) 1685	53% (+1)	—	—	—	—
3	Deer Park (0-0) 1800	42% (-3)	—	—	—	—
4	@#7Sheldon CE King (0-0) 2509	4% (-32)	—	—	—	—
5	@Channelview (0-0) 1063	94% (+26)	—	—	—	—
6	#5Humble Summer Creek (0-0) 2589	3% (-35)	—	—	—	—
7	Crosby (0-0) 1478	73% (+10)	—	—	—	—
9	@#12Humble Atascocita (0-0) 2401	5% (-27)	—	—	—	—
10	Humble (0-0) 1449	76% (+11)	—	—	—	—
11	@#1Galena Park North Shore (0-0) 2731	< 2% (-41)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 17-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		1	Galena Park North Shore (1) Mustangs	95.2 2731	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.1-0.9	> 98%	D1
2		5	Humble Summer Creek (2) Bulldogs	93 2589	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.6-1.4	> 98%	D1
3		7	Sheldon CE King (3) Panthers	91.8 2509	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.2-1.8	> 98%	D2
4		12	Humble Atascocita (4) Eagles	90.2 2401	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.8-2.2	97%	D2
5		70	Humble Kingwood (7) Mustangs	79.9 1718	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.5-4.4	3.9%	—
6		122	Crosby (8) Cougars	76.3 1478	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.7-5.3	< 2%	—
7		134	Humble (5) Wildcats	75.8 1449	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.6-5.4	< 2%	—
8		200	Channelview (6) Falcons	70 1063	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.4-6.6	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Humble Kingwood’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2024

9-5

Rating 624 (83rd)

#2 · 2015

6-5

Rating 602 (78th)

#3 · 2013

7-4

Rating 589 (75th)

#4 · 2025

5-5

Rating 582 (73rd)

#5 · 2012

4-6

Rating 573 (70th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	5-5	1729	32.4	34.6	−2.2	1780	+7.5	−2.3	+9.8	1745	−0.68	+0.55	−1.23	582(73rd)
2024	9-5	1927	31.0	28.4	+2.6	1756	+8.0	−6.6	+14.6	1864	+1.89	+2.69	−0.80	624(83rd)
2023	3-7	1424	15.6	34.3	−18.7	1794	−6.0	−1.0	−5.1	1373	−2.71	+0.29	−3.00	511(48th)
2022	5-5	1510	20.0	28.9	−8.9	1819	−1.4	−6.9	+5.5	1637	−0.88	+0.60	−1.48	548(62nd)
2021	1-9	1299	11.8	36.8	−25.0	1902	−9.4	−0.6	−8.8	1281	−3.87	+0.09	−3.96	486(39th)
2020	2-7	1414	12.8	34.8	−22.0	1813	−11.4	−2.9	−8.5	1289	−2.91	+0.41	−3.33	485(38th)
2019	5-6	1417	29.7	25.7	+4.0	1420	−1.6	−2.0	+0.5	1511	−2.87	+0.18	−3.05	511(49th)
2018	7-4	1654	27.2	16.5	+10.7	1445	−4.3	−10.9	+6.7	1667	−0.66	+0.77	−1.43	560(65th)
2017	6-6	1683	22.1	28.8	−6.8	1651	−2.7	−2.5	−0.2	1495	−1.80	+0.92	−2.72	543(60th)
2016	6-6	1554	24.6	24.1	+0.5	1599	−2.2	−6.2	+4.0	1601	−2.14	+0.68	−2.82	542(59th)
2015	6-5	1743	23.4	26.8	−3.5	1903	+5.1	−8.2	+13.3	1832	+0.41	+1.20	−0.78	602(78th)
2014	3-7	1508	23.0	30.1	−7.1	1778	+3.5	−2.9	+6.4	1661	−2.84	+0.53	−3.37	546(61st)
2013	7-4	1736	32.3	30.0	+2.3	1774	+10.1	−3.1	+13.2	1829	+0.67	+2.15	−1.48	589(75th)
2012	4-6	1685	31.9	34.6	−2.7	1788	+7.1	−1.7	+8.8	1721	−1.19	+1.43	−2.62	573(70th)
2011	6-4	1678	26.4	29.4	−3.0	1615	+2.5	+0.2	+2.3	1558	+0.12	+1.18	−1.07	546(61st)
2010	3-8	1401	23.0	33.1	−10.1	1718	−0.4	+1.5	−1.9	1453	−3.34	+0.35	−3.69	508(47th)
2009	6-6	1502	15.8	16.6	−0.7	1581	−7.0	−8.4	+1.4	1536	−1.92	+1.38	−3.31	539(59th)
2008	4-5	1331	22.7	23.9	−1.2	1491	−2.1	−0.4	−1.7	1457	−2.69	+0.65	−3.34	502(45th)
2007	3-8	1312	23.4	31.3	−7.9	1526	−0.2	+6.5	−6.7	1332	−5.20	+0.28	−5.48	485(38th)
2006	7-4	1544	29.5	25.2	+4.3	1485	+3.0	0.0	+2.9	1574	−1.71	+1.41	−3.12	544(60th)
2005	3-5	1324	13.2	23.9	−10.6	1592	−9.0	−2.6	−6.4	1340	−3.07	+0.23	−3.30	488(40th)
2004	3-7	1496	17.3	21.6	−4.3	1515	−5.9	−3.2	−2.6	1435	−4.24	+0.84	−5.08	519(52nd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.