← Back
CLASS 6A · District 17-6A

Humble Atascocita Eagles

Enrollment: 3,579 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4
Rank
#12
was #12
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
2401
#12 of 249
OVR Grade
90.2
#12 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@#10Katy (0-0) 2427
47% (-1)
2
#17Cibolo Steele (0-0) 2273
63% (+5)
3
@#13Dickinson (0-0) 2378
52% (+1)
4
Humble (0-0) 1449
> 98% (+38)
5 20% (-13)
6
#7Sheldon CE King (0-0) 2509
39% (-4)
7
@Channelview (0-0) 1063
> 98% (+54)
9
Humble Kingwood (0-0) 1718
95% (+27)
10
@Crosby (0-0) 1478
98% (+37)
11
#5Humble Summer Creek (0-0) 2589
31% (-8)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 17-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 1
Mustangs
95.2
2731
0-0 0-0 6.1-0.9 > 98% D1
2 5
Bulldogs
93
2589
0-0 0-0 5.6-1.4 > 98% D1
3 7
Panthers
91.8
2509
0-0 0-0 5.2-1.8 > 98% D2
4 12
Eagles
90.2
2401
0-0 0-0 4.8-2.2 97% D2
5 70
Mustangs
79.9
1718
0-0 0-0 2.5-4.4 3.9%
6 122
Cougars
76.3
1478
0-0 0-0 1.7-5.3 < 2%
7 134
Wildcats
75.8
1449
0-0 0-0 1.6-5.4 < 2%
8 200
Falcons
70
1063
0-0 0-0 0.4-6.6 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Humble Atascocita’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2022
11-3
Rating 806 (99th)
#2 · 2024
12-2
Rating 788 (98th)
#3 · 2023
11-3
Rating 785 (98th)
#4 · 2021
11-3
Rating 764 (98th)
#5 · 2019
12-2
Rating 755 (98th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 6-5 2113 46.8 31.5 +15.4 1971 +25.3 −10.2 +35.6 2389 +1.15 +1.83 −0.69 719(95th)
2024 12-2 2615 43.1 23.5 +19.6 2024 +24.0 −16.8 +40.8 2520 +6.97 +7.01 −0.04 788(98th)
2023 11-3 2401 49.1 23.3 +25.8 1954 +29.6 −13.7 +43.3 2583 +4.90 +5.03 −0.13 785(98th)
2022 11-3 2466 37.2 11.9 +25.4 1999 +19.0 −26.5 +45.5 2637 +5.01 +5.08 −0.07 806(99th)
2021 11-3 2437 36.6 20.5 +16.1 2142 +20.3 −20.6 +41.0 2525 +5.77 +5.90 −0.13 764(98th)
2020 7-3 2254 40.5 27.7 +12.8 1952 +18.6 −10.6 +29.2 2231 +2.50 +2.80 −0.30 710(95th)
2019 12-2 2426 57.7 19.3 +38.4 1627 +30.3 −11.9 +42.2 2554 +3.23 +3.30 −0.07 755(98th)
2018 11-2 2319 51.2 19.9 +31.3 1471 +21.9 −8.2 +30.2 2254 +1.93 +2.09 −0.16 692(93rd)
2017 10-2 2377 43.0 15.7 +27.3 1751 +19.4 −17.0 +36.4 2410 +2.97 +3.07 −0.10 741(97th)
2016 12-2 2404 40.4 17.4 +22.9 1801 +18.1 −15.8 +33.9 2348 +4.55 +4.64 −0.10 739(97th)
2015 12-2 2198 44.1 21.9 +22.1 1617 +19.6 −7.4 +27.1 2176 +3.42 +3.68 −0.26 680(91st)
2014 9-2 1950 32.5 17.5 +15.0 1459 +5.9 −10.4 +16.4 1909 +1.40 +1.92 −0.52 617(82nd)
2013 10-2 2005 33.8 24.8 +9.0 1734 +10.8 −7.5 +18.4 1959 +3.05 +3.31 −0.26 639(86th)
2012 5-5 1441 26.6 32.4 −5.8 1743 +0.4 −3.2 +3.6 1589 −0.96 +1.00 −1.97 528(55th)
2011 3-7 1140 16.4 31.4 −15.0 1692 −8.1 +0.7 −8.8 1280 −3.64 +0.23 −3.87 460(30th)
2010 3-7 1278 16.5 31.8 −15.3 1618 −9.7 +2.2 −11.9 1202 −3.41 +0.28 −3.70 464(31st)
2009 10-2 1803 27.7 16.4 +11.2 1424 +2.0 −6.4 +8.4 1710 +0.52 +1.56 −1.04 591(75th)
2008 5-4 1491 19.4 15.2 +4.2 1396 −7.3 −6.9 −0.4 1491 −1.85 +0.61 −2.47 530(55th)
2007 3-7 995 16.1 29.1 −13.0 1331 −12.6 +7.2 −19.8 1006 −5.56 +0.07 −5.64 413(18th)
2006 1-9 914 11.3 42.6 −31.3 1404 −17.6 +16.7 −34.3 643 −7.09 +0.04 −7.13 357(8th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.