← Back
CLASS 6A · District 20-6A

Houston Westside Wolves

Enrollment: 2,489 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 7
Rank
#243
was #243
Record
0-7
0-5 district
Elo
464
#243 of 249
OVR Grade
61
#243 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
56.4
#247 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
51.6
#246 of 249 in 6A
Perf
151
#247 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
Fort Bend Kempner
 14% (-18) L 7-28 699 −26.5 +5.5 — −0.94
2
@Fort Bend Clements (3-4) 1095
 34% (-6) L 7-62 -176 −28.8 +38.2 — −0.98
3
@Alief Elsik (1-5) 920
 24% (-11) L 7-55 -421 −29.5 +47.3 — −0.98
4
@Houston Bellaire (1-6) 735
 41% (-3) L 22-41 139 −24.4 +30.1 — −0.99
5
@Alief Hastings (3-4) 1088
 15% (-17) L 0-56 -274 −33.1 +37.8 — −0.98
6
Houston Stratford (2-4) 1345
 2% (-36) L 7-48 283 −22.4 +26.3 — −0.89
7
@Houston Memorial (6-0) 1946
 < 2% (-59) L 0-42 808 −20.1 +7.6 — −0.40
9
Alief Taylor (6-1) 1457
 < 2% (-40) — — — — — —
10
@Houston Lamar (4-2) 1731
 < 2% (-51) — — — — — —
11
Houston Heights (2-4) 1367
 2% (-36) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 20-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 51
Mustangs
83.3
1946
 6-0 4-0 44.5 9.7 7.5-0.5 > 98% D2
2 76
Texans
80.1
1731
 4-2 4-0 31.8 18.4 6.9-1.1 > 98% D1
3 132
Lions
76
1457
 6-1 4-1 39.0 16.7 5.3-2.7 > 98% D1
4 156
Spartans
74.3
1345
 2-4 2-2 21.7 28.2 4.4-3.6 46.4% D2
5 148
Bulldogs
74.6
1367
 2-4 2-2 24.3 23.2 4.3-3.7 45.8% —
6 195
Bears
70.4
1088
 3-4 2-3 22.4 27.7 3.7-4.3 8.3% —
7 214
Rams
67.8
920
 1-5 1-3 10.7 30.7 2.2-5.8 < 2% —
8 231
Cardinals
65.1
735
 1-6 1-4 12.8 44.8 1.6-6.4 < 2% —
9 243
Wolves
61
464
 0-7 0-5 7.1 47.4 0-8 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Houston Westside’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2004
11-1
Rating 684 (92nd)
#2 · 2011
8-3
Rating 598 (77th)
#3 · 2006
10-2
Rating 584 (73rd)
#4 · 2005
6-5
Rating 555 (64th)
#5 · 2013
7-4
Rating 550 (62nd)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 2-8 642 20.6 36.8 −16.2 1046 −17.8 +17.3 −35.1 621 −6.80 +0.00 −6.80 329(5th)
2024 3-8 715 23.0 31.7 −8.7 1021 −15.3 +13.2 −28.6 786 −6.44 +0.01 −6.45 357(8th)
2023 2-8 622 14.4 34.9 −20.5 1038 −22.8 +16.5 −39.4 516 −6.88 +0.01 −6.89 317(4th)
2022 4-7 1099 24.1 33.1 −9.0 1181 −9.7 +13.3 −23.0 925 −5.25 +0.04 −5.29 407(16th)
2021 6-3 1405 32.7 28.8 +3.9 1192 −1.2 +7.8 −9.0 1274 −1.20 +0.22 −1.42 477(36th)
2020 4-4 1129 23.6 26.9 −3.2 1217 −11.8 +5.0 −16.8 1080 −2.51 +0.12 −2.63 422(20th)
2019 4-5 1161 35.2 33.1 +2.1 1145 −0.4 +12.0 −12.4 1191 −3.57 +0.09 −3.67 445(26th)
2018 5-6 1130 22.7 27.6 −4.9 1200 −11.0 +5.8 −16.9 1078 −4.31 +0.19 −4.51 429(22nd)
2017 4-5 1353 25.4 30.7 −5.2 1446 −4.7 +4.5 −9.2 1269 −2.38 +0.26 −2.64 474(34th)
2016 4-6 1253 21.8 23.8 −2.0 1385 −9.5 −1.4 −8.2 1296 −3.56 +0.15 −3.71 469(33rd)
2015 4-7 1279 28.3 23.7 +4.5 1370 −3.3 −1.1 −2.2 1446 −4.29 +0.06 −4.34 490(40th)
2014 4-6 1347 28.2 32.9 −4.7 1366 −5.1 +6.0 −11.1 1224 −2.94 +0.11 −3.05 468(32nd)
2013 7-4 1589 42.7 27.6 +15.1 1338 +9.7 +2.9 +6.8 1669 −1.26 +0.42 −1.68 550(62nd)
2012 6-5 1532 32.2 22.1 +10.1 1367 +2.3 −1.0 +3.2 1581 −2.21 +0.49 −2.71 534(57th)
2011 8-3 1706 43.7 19.2 +24.5 1329 +13.5 −3.4 +16.9 1923 −0.38 +1.33 −1.71 598(77th)
2010 2-8 1095 25.6 32.9 −7.3 1293 −5.5 +11.2 −16.7 1083 −6.30 +0.01 −6.30 431(22nd)
2009 8-3 1632 27.4 18.7 +8.6 1326 −1.5 −4.9 +3.3 1583 −0.75 +1.61 −2.36 545(60th)
2008 5-3 1490 29.8 30.0 −0.2 1412 +1.9 +4.6 −2.6 1434 −0.93 +0.67 −1.60 513(49th)
2007 6-5 1425 35.2 27.5 +7.6 1322 +6.5 +6.8 −0.3 1493 −3.11 +0.47 −3.58 517(51st)
2006 10-2 1750 35.6 20.5 +15.1 1342 +6.2 −1.6 +7.7 1693 +0.51 +1.83 −1.32 584(73rd)
2005 6-5 1569 30.5 17.3 +13.2 1331 +1.5 −4.2 +5.7 1642 −2.73 +0.45 −3.18 555(64th)
2004 11-1 1927 43.7 10.2 +33.5 1335 +14.5 −11.9 +26.4 2160 +1.54 +2.10 −0.56 684(92nd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.