← Back

CLASS 6A · District 20-6A

Houston Stratford Spartans

Enrollment: 2,452 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 9

Rank

#143

was #143

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1414

#143 of 249

OVR Grade

75.3

#143 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@#40Tomball (0-0) 1941	10% (-21)	—	—	—	—
2	@Langham Creek (0-0) 1612	30% (-8)	—	—	—	—
3	@Alief Hastings (0-0) 975	86% (+18)	—	—	—	—
5	#47Houston Memorial (0-0) 1907	11% (-20)	—	—	—	—
6	@Houston Westside (0-0) 758	94% (+26)	—	—	—	—
7	Alief Taylor (0-0) 1287	63% (+5)	—	—	—	—
8	@Houston Lamar (0-0) 1805	16% (-16)	—	—	—	—
9	Houston Heights (0-0) 1521	39% (-4)	—	—	—	—
10	@Alief Elsik (0-0) 1019	84% (+16)	—	—	—	—
11	Houston Bellaire (0-0) 757	94% (+26)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 20-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		47	Houston Memorial (6) Mustangs	82.8 1907	0-0	0-0	—	—	7.2-0.8	> 98%	D1
2		62	Houston Lamar (4) Texans	81.2 1805	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.8-1.2	> 98%	D1
3		108	Houston Heights (8) Bulldogs	76.9 1521	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.4-2.6	85.7%	D2
4		143	Houston Stratford (9) Spartans	75.3 1414	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.9-3.1	71.7%	D2
5		169	Alief Taylor (5) Lions	73.4 1287	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.2-3.8	35.8%	—
6		204	Alief Elsik (1) Rams	69.3 1019	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.6-5.4	4.7%	—
7		209	Alief Hastings (2) Bears	68.7 975	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.4-5.6	3.1%	—
8		232	Houston Bellaire (3) Cardinals	65.4 757	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.2-6.8	< 2%	—
9		231	Houston Westside (7) Wolves	65.4 758	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.2-6.8	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Houston Stratford’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2021

10-2

Rating 606 (79th)

#2 · 2006

10-2

Rating 601 (78th)

#3 · 2007

9-4

Rating 589 (75th)

#4 · 2022

8-3

Rating 588 (74th)

#5 · 2023

9-4

Rating 583 (73rd)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	5-7	1430	32.4	32.2	+0.2	1365	+0.4	+5.7	−5.3	1368	−4.31	+0.17	−4.48	510(48th)
2024	8-4	1650	43.8	26.0	+17.8	1353	+12.1	+2.0	+10.1	1753	−1.49	+0.78	−2.27	571(69th)
2023	9-4	1769	40.8	25.2	+15.6	1306	+8.5	+2.3	+6.2	1655	−0.77	+0.77	−1.54	583(73rd)
2022	8-3	1762	41.9	19.8	+22.1	1331	+8.1	−5.3	+13.4	1836	−0.35	+1.36	−1.71	588(74th)
2021	10-2	1749	37.1	15.2	+21.9	1327	+5.6	−8.7	+14.4	1859	+0.84	+1.37	−0.53	606(79th)
2020	6-4	1348	30.1	23.8	+6.3	1202	−2.4	+3.7	−6.2	1346	−2.10	+0.47	−2.56	477(36th)
2019	4-6	1227	17.8	25.3	−7.5	1422	−10.0	+1.4	−11.4	1215	−3.16	+0.56	−3.72	454(29th)
2018	4-6	1330	28.7	26.1	+2.6	1374	−1.9	+2.3	−4.2	1396	−3.68	+0.18	−3.86	488(40th)
2017	6-4	1779	21.6	20.9	+0.7	1574	−2.8	−5.5	+2.7	1569	−0.30	+0.76	−1.06	552(63rd)
2016	7-4	1730	20.9	19.3	+1.6	1502	−4.9	−7.0	+2.1	1553	−0.62	+0.98	−1.60	546(61st)
2015	2-0	1642	25.5	6.5	+19.0	1561	+5.0	−18.0	+23.0	2076	+0.74	+0.74	0.00	—
2014	0-2	1236	15.5	29.0	−13.5	1723	−7.6	+2.0	−9.6	1260	−1.36	0.00	−1.36	—
2013	0-2	1359	27.5	34.0	−6.5	1710	+3.4	+2.3	+1.0	1526	−1.33	0.00	−1.33	—
2012	1-1	1418	17.5	24.0	−6.5	1448	−7.4	−0.8	−6.7	1333	−0.43	+0.04	−0.46	—
2011	0-2	1408	14.0	40.0	−26.0	1775	−10.6	+5.3	−15.9	1103	−1.29	0.00	−1.29	—
2010	1-1	1674	25.5	27.0	−1.5	1660	−1.3	−5.6	+4.3	1607	−0.49	+0.19	−0.68	—
2009	8-3	1724	27.4	18.1	+9.3	1412	−1.2	−5.8	+4.5	1613	−0.07	+1.06	−1.13	559(65th)
2008	5-4	1498	18.3	16.8	+1.6	1379	−7.8	−2.9	−4.9	1378	−2.20	+0.39	−2.58	512(49th)
2007	9-4	1792	31.5	23.2	+8.3	1495	+6.1	−2.3	+8.4	1710	−0.81	+2.09	−2.90	589(75th)
2006	10-2	1817	29.8	16.7	+13.2	1450	+3.6	−7.7	+11.3	1783	+0.30	+1.31	−1.01	601(78th)
2005	5-5	1366	23.1	19.4	+3.7	1320	−3.8	+0.3	−4.1	1397	−3.19	+0.51	−3.69	500(44th)
2004	4-6	1433	13.0	13.0	0.0	1361	−13.7	−8.2	−5.5	1362	−3.66	+0.43	−4.09	518(51st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.