← Back
CLASS 6A · District 20-6A

Houston Lamar Texans

Enrollment: 2,826 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4
Rank
#62
was #62
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1805
#62 of 249
OVR Grade
81.2
#62 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
#33Manvel (0-0) 1985
32% (-7)
2
@Katy Jordan (0-0) 1820
48% (-1)
4
Houston Heights (0-0) 1521
77% (+11)
5
@Alief Elsik (0-0) 1019
96% (+31)
6 > 98% (+42)
7
@Alief Hastings (0-0) 975
97% (+33)
8 84% (+16)
9
@#47Houston Memorial (0-0) 1907
39% (-4)
10 > 98% (+42)
11
@Alief Taylor (0-0) 1287
90% (+21)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 20-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 47
Mustangs
82.8
1907
0-0 0-0 7.2-0.8 > 98% D1
2 62
Texans
81.2
1805
0-0 0-0 6.8-1.2 > 98% D1
3 108
Bulldogs
76.9
1521
0-0 0-0 5.4-2.6 85.7% D2
4 143
Spartans
75.3
1414
0-0 0-0 4.9-3.1 71.7% D2
5 169
Lions
73.4
1287
0-0 0-0 4.2-3.8 35.8%
6 204
Rams
69.3
1019
0-0 0-0 2.6-5.4 4.7%
7 209
Bears
68.7
975
0-0 0-0 2.4-5.6 3.1%
8 232
Cardinals
65.4
757
0-0 0-0 1.2-6.8 < 2%
9 231
Wolves
65.4
758
0-0 0-0 1.2-6.8 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Houston Lamar’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2023
12-1
Rating 729 (96th)
#2 · 2012
15-1
Rating 728 (96th)
#3 · 2013
11-1
Rating 722 (96th)
#4 · 2016
11-2
Rating 690 (93rd)
#5 · 2014
10-2
Rating 684 (92nd)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 8-4 1700 42.6 20.3 +22.3 1222 +6.7 −4.2 +10.9 1771 −0.84 +0.47 −1.31 579(71st)
2024 8-4 1874 37.2 22.8 +14.5 1336 +6.0 −2.6 +8.6 1715 −0.04 +0.78 −0.82 592(76th)
2023 12-1 2126 50.6 8.5 +42.1 1293 +17.3 −16.5 +33.8 2344 +2.44 +2.55 −0.11 729(96th)
2022 9-3 1925 44.6 13.6 +31.0 1319 +12.4 −10.4 +22.8 2070 +0.01 +0.99 −0.98 658(89th)
2021 8-3 1873 33.6 11.7 +21.9 1274 +0.4 −11.8 +12.2 1804 −0.71 +1.06 −1.77 608(80th)
2020 6-3 1801 35.9 18.8 +17.1 1327 +4.2 −5.7 +9.9 1748 −0.93 +0.57 −1.50 583(73rd)
2019 6-4 1772 29.4 18.9 +10.5 1379 −2.2 −7.6 +5.4 1635 −0.59 +0.25 −0.84 560(65th)
2018 7-4 1881 35.4 22.5 +12.9 1484 +5.9 −4.2 +10.1 1752 −0.61 +1.04 −1.66 586(74th)
2017 9-2 2192 37.8 13.7 +24.1 1456 +8.7 −12.7 +21.4 2035 +1.36 +1.55 −0.19 664(90th)
2016 11-2 2237 39.0 12.9 +26.1 1526 +11.5 −14.6 +26.1 2152 +2.95 +3.24 −0.29 690(93rd)
2015 11-2 2100 43.5 10.9 +32.6 1359 +12.2 −13.4 +25.7 2142 +1.31 +1.73 −0.42 677(91st)
2014 10-2 2098 48.6 13.7 +34.9 1377 +15.9 −13.4 +29.3 2232 +1.28 +2.05 −0.78 684(92nd)
2013 11-1 2218 41.6 8.9 +32.7 1491 +12.7 −18.8 +31.5 2289 +2.12 +2.46 −0.34 722(96th)
2012 15-1 2320 36.7 10.4 +26.3 1574 +10.0 −18.0 +28.0 2200 +4.51 +4.52 −0.02 728(96th)
2011 10-3 1895 32.6 17.8 +14.8 1446 +4.5 −8.2 +12.7 1817 +0.41 +2.03 −1.62 610(80th)
2010 9-2 1859 36.9 11.5 +25.4 1273 +4.5 −11.3 +15.8 1896 +0.00 +1.00 −1.00 626(84th)
2009 9-2 1887 30.3 13.4 +16.9 1412 +3.7 −11.2 +14.9 1873 +0.59 +1.58 −0.98 624(83rd)
2008 8-2 1786 35.5 13.7 +21.8 1334 +5.6 −8.6 +14.2 1854 −0.52 +0.84 −1.36 609(80th)
2007 10-2 1849 38.8 12.3 +26.4 1254 +7.6 −8.1 +15.7 1893 −0.33 +1.04 −1.36 624(83rd)
2006 9-3 1828 37.9 14.0 +23.9 1328 +7.1 −8.9 +16.0 1900 −0.97 +0.91 −1.88 630(84th)
2005 10-1 1993 36.2 8.4 +27.8 1355 +6.4 −15.2 +21.5 2038 +1.66 +1.78 −0.12 663(90th)
2004 8-4 1748 39.7 21.7 +18.0 1393 +10.8 −2.4 +13.2 1830 −0.98 +1.54 −2.52 599(77th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.