| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | #28Manvel (5-1) 2101 |
32% (-7) | L 0-30 | 1570 | −11.0 | −13.8 | — | −0.36 |
| 2 | @Katy Jordan (4-2) 1745 |
41% (-3) | L 27-41 | 1533 | +5.2 | +3.9 | — | −0.53 |
| 4 | Houston Heights (2-4) 1367 |
77% (+12) | W 42-7 | 2281 | +15.5 | −15.7 | +0.12 | — |
| 5 | @Alief Elsik (1-5) 920 |
96% (+30) | W 45-0 | 1904 | +8.5 | −7.7 | +0.02 | — |
| 6 | Houston Bellaire (1-6) 735 |
> 98% (+39) | W (F) | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | @Alief Hastings (3-4) 1088 |
93% (+25) | W 45-14 | 1901 | +11.9 | −4.2 | +0.04 | — |
| 8 | Houston Stratford (2-4) 1345 |
83% (+15) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | @Houston Memorial (6-0) 1946 |
29% (-9) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | Houston Westside (0-7) 464 |
> 98% (+51) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | @Alief Taylor (6-1) 1457 |
76% (+11) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#76
was #76
Record
4-2
4-0 district
Elo
1731
#76 of 249
OVR Grade
80.1
#76 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
79.2
#80 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
81.4
#64 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1838
#68 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 20-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Houston Lamar’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2023
12-1
Rating 729 (96th)
#2 · 2012
15-1
Rating 728 (96th)
#3 · 2013
11-1
Rating 722 (96th)
#4 · 2016
11-2
Rating 690 (93rd)
#5 · 2014
10-2
Rating 684 (92nd)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.