← Back
CLASS 6A · District 20-6A

Houston Heights Bulldogs

Enrollment: 2,470 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 8
Rank
#108
was #108
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1521
#108 of 249
OVR Grade
76.9
#108 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@#45Spring Westfield (0-0) 1914
16% (-16)
2
@Clear Springs (0-0) 1594
42% (-3)
3
Alief Taylor (0-0) 1287
73% (+9)
4
@Houston Lamar (0-0) 1805
23% (-11)
6
Alief Elsik (0-0) 1019
89% (+20)
7
@Houston Bellaire (0-0) 757
96% (+31)
8
Alief Hastings (0-0) 975
91% (+22)
9
@Houston Stratford (0-0) 1414
61% (+4)
10
#47Houston Memorial (0-0) 1907
17% (-15)
11
@Houston Westside (0-0) 758
96% (+31)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 20-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 47
Mustangs
82.8
1907
0-0 0-0 7.2-0.8 > 98% D1
2 62
Texans
81.2
1805
0-0 0-0 6.8-1.2 > 98% D1
3 108
Bulldogs
76.9
1521
0-0 0-0 5.4-2.6 85.7% D2
4 143
Spartans
75.3
1414
0-0 0-0 4.9-3.1 71.7% D2
5 169
Lions
73.4
1287
0-0 0-0 4.2-3.8 35.8%
6 204
Rams
69.3
1019
0-0 0-0 2.6-5.4 4.7%
7 209
Bears
68.7
975
0-0 0-0 2.4-5.6 3.1%
8 232
Cardinals
65.4
757
0-0 0-0 1.2-6.8 < 2%
9 231
Wolves
65.4
758
0-0 0-0 1.2-6.8 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Houston Heights’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2023
8-4
Rating 582 (73rd)
#2 · 2020
7-2
Rating 562 (66th)
#3 · 2022
8-4
Rating 562 (66th)
#4 · 2015
8-2
Rating 559 (65th)
#5 · 2024
8-4
Rating 559 (65th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 6-5 1255 35.8 17.8 +18.0 961 −4.6 +0.5 −5.1 1372 −4.03 +0.06 −4.08 487(39th)
2024 8-4 1563 34.9 13.8 +21.1 1050 −1.3 −3.4 +2.1 1552 −2.35 +0.27 −2.63 559(65th)
2023 8-4 1554 36.8 14.8 +22.0 1226 +2.8 −6.5 +9.3 1731 −1.58 +0.31 −1.89 582(73rd)
2022 8-4 1570 39.8 23.4 +16.3 1300 +8.3 +0.6 +7.6 1691 −1.29 +0.89 −2.18 562(66th)
2021 4-7 1222 33.9 24.5 +9.5 1320 +2.3 +3.2 −0.9 1478 −4.82 +0.05 −4.87 488(39th)
2020 7-2 1598 40.8 18.1 +22.7 1244 +6.9 −4.0 +10.9 1772 +0.02 +0.82 −0.80 562(66th)
2019 4-7 1133 30.2 32.0 −1.8 1269 −2.5 +8.5 −11.0 1224 −5.20 +0.12 −5.32 447(27th)
2018 4-7 1275 28.6 21.7 +6.9 1273 −4.2 −0.8 −3.3 1417 −5.16 +0.10 −5.26 486(39th)
2017 6-3 1422 35.8 27.1 +8.7 1230 +1.1 +3.5 −2.4 1440 −1.11 +0.40 −1.51 503(45th)
2016 4-7 1270 20.9 23.3 −2.4 1318 −11.4 −2.1 −9.4 1266 −4.40 +0.12 −4.52 466(32nd)
2015 8-2 1534 35.9 13.6 +22.3 1186 −0.7 −8.3 +7.6 1690 −0.46 +0.69 −1.16 559(65th)
2014 6-5 1378 32.2 22.5 +9.6 1242 −4.1 −1.3 −2.9 1429 −3.14 +0.31 −3.44 498(43rd)
2013 0-1 1246 21.0 35.0 −14.0 1589 −8.9 −2.6 −6.4 1340 −0.79 0.00 −0.79
2012 0-1 1281 0.0 43.0 −43.0 1532 −25.3 +13.7 −38.9 527 −0.66 0.00 −0.66
2009 0-1 1289 8.0 14.0 −6.0 534 −37.0 +12.3 −49.3 268 −0.99 0.00 −0.99
2008 1-0 1513 27.0 8.0 +19.0 580 −21.1 +0.4 −21.4 964 +0.01 +0.01 0.00
2007 1-0 1507 72.0 8.0 +64.0 416 +17.2 +6.7 +10.4 1761 +0.00 +0.00 0.00
2006 1-0 1504 63.0 0.0 +63.0 457 +8.0 −1.4 +9.4 1736 +0.00 +0.00 0.00
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.