← Back

CLASS 6A · District 8-6A

Grand Prairie Gophers

Enrollment: 3,040 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4

Rank

#229

was #229

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

766

#229 of 249

OVR Grade

65.5

#229 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@Garland Lakeview Centennial (0-0) 1510	4% (-30)	—	—	—	—
2	North Garland (0-0) 1096	20% (-13)	—	—	—	—
3	@Dallas Skyline (0-0) 1327	9% (-22)	—	—	—	—
5	@Fort Worth Haltom (0-0) 1386	7% (-25)	—	—	—	—
6	@Hurst Bell (0-0) 1252	12% (-19)	—	—	—	—
7	Irving Nimitz (0-0) 487	76% (+11)	—	—	—	—
8	Irving MacArthur (0-0) 1019	26% (-10)	—	—	—	—
9	@Euless Trinity (0-0) 1856	< 2% (-44)	—	—	—	—
10	Irving (0-0) 522	73% (+10)	—	—	—	—
11	South Grand Prairie (0-0) 1816	< 2% (-42)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 8-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		53	Euless Trinity (1) Trojans	82 1856	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.3-0.7	> 98%	D1
2		60	South Grand Prairie (2) Warriors	81.4 1816	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.2-0.8	> 98%	D1
3		147	Fort Worth Haltom (5) Buffaloes	74.9 1386	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.6-2.4	92.1%	D2
4		173	Hurst Bell (3) Blue Raiders	72.9 1252	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-3	79.1%	D2
5		204	Irving MacArthur (6) Cardinals	69.3 1019	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.1-3.9	24.9%	—
6		229	Grand Prairie (4) Gophers	65.5 766	0-0	0-0	—	—	2-5	3.4%	—
7		245	Irving (8) Tigers	61.8 522	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-6	< 2%	—
8		247	Irving Nimitz (7) Vikings	61.3 487	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.9-6.1	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Grand Prairie’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2021

7-5

Rating 544 (60th)

#2 · 2016

4-6

Rating 522 (53rd)

#3 · 2014

5-5

Rating 514 (50th)

#4 · 2017

5-6

Rating 511 (48th)

#5 · 2006

4-6

Rating 483 (38th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	2-8	803	17.2	48.8	−31.6	1252	−17.6	+22.3	−39.9	502	−6.51	+0.01	−6.52	328(5th)
2024	1-9	672	20.5	38.3	−17.8	1219	−15.6	+13.3	−28.9	778	−7.88	+0.00	−7.88	352(7th)
2023	1-9	1002	17.4	39.0	−21.6	1478	−11.7	+11.1	−22.8	930	−6.76	+0.01	−6.77	406(16th)
2022	1-9	1142	14.3	42.3	−28.0	1630	−10.9	+10.6	−21.5	963	−6.27	+0.03	−6.29	416(18th)
2021	7-5	1686	29.8	30.7	−0.8	1631	+2.3	−1.0	+3.4	1584	−0.98	+1.67	−2.65	544(60th)
2020	3-3	1466	21.5	21.2	+0.3	1675	+0.1	−9.4	+9.5	1737	−0.78	+0.52	−1.31	—
2019	1-9	1240	13.8	36.2	−22.4	1769	−9.3	+1.4	−10.6	1234	−4.59	+0.06	−4.65	464(31st)
2018	2-8	1318	6.6	27.5	−20.9	1795	−13.9	−4.4	−9.5	1263	−4.19	+0.20	−4.39	477(35th)
2017	5-6	1454	18.9	27.7	−8.8	1691	−2.8	−1.8	−1.0	1476	−1.31	+0.92	−2.23	511(48th)
2016	4-6	1391	28.1	30.5	−2.4	1660	+3.6	−0.7	+4.2	1606	−2.17	+0.25	−2.42	522(53rd)
2015	2-8	1137	14.8	33.0	−18.2	1618	−10.9	+3.3	−14.2	1146	−4.57	+0.05	−4.62	438(24th)
2014	5-5	1564	21.5	31.4	−9.9	1646	−6.2	−3.2	−3.0	1426	−1.15	+0.81	−1.96	514(50th)
2013	1-9	969	22.4	48.7	−26.3	1814	+1.0	+14.4	−13.4	1164	−4.32	+0.01	−4.33	436(24th)
2012	2-8	976	20.9	49.1	−28.2	1722	−3.0	+14.2	−17.2	1070	−4.08	+0.07	−4.15	415(18th)
2011	0-10	782	18.6	40.5	−21.9	1561	−10.6	+9.3	−19.9	1003	−7.41	0.00	−7.41	391(13th)
2010	2-8	929	21.1	48.3	−27.2	1468	−8.1	+19.3	−27.5	814	−6.18	+0.21	−6.39	380(11th)
2009	2-7	1238	17.3	33.7	−16.3	1483	−9.2	+8.3	−17.5	1063	−4.40	+0.48	−4.89	440(24th)
2008	1-9	1074	15.1	31.1	−16.0	1585	−9.4	+2.7	−12.1	1199	−6.23	+0.02	−6.25	444(26th)
2007	2-8	1131	11.8	30.2	−18.4	1606	−10.1	+4.1	−14.2	1144	−5.20	+0.12	−5.32	444(26th)
2006	4-6	1240	17.2	24.4	−7.2	1559	−5.8	−0.3	−5.5	1363	−3.32	+0.30	−3.62	483(38th)
2005	0-10	982	9.1	38.7	−29.6	1761	−10.1	+9.4	−19.5	1013	−5.71	0.00	−5.71	418(19th)
2004	1-9	1084	9.0	37.4	−28.4	1688	−12.1	+7.8	−19.9	1003	−5.82	+0.20	−6.03	424(21st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.