← Back
CLASS 6A · District 9-6A

Garland Owls

Enrollment: 2,144 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5
Rank
#172
was #172
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1259
#172 of 249
OVR Grade
73
#172 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
—
DEF Grade
—
Perf
—

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
Frisco Emerson
 13% (-18) — — — —
2
@Dallas W.T. White
 66% (+6) — — — —
3
@Marshall
 16% (-16) — — — —
4
Garland Lakeview Centennial (0-0) 1510
 26% (-10) — — — —
5
@Wylie East (0-0) 1679
 15% (-17) — — — —
7
North Garland (0-0) 1096
 66% (+7) — — — —
8
Wylie (0-0) 1328
 43% (-3) — — — —
9
@Garland Rowlett (0-0) 1534
 24% (-11) — — — —
10
South Garland (0-0) 506
 96% (+30) — — — —
11
@Garland Sachse (0-0) 1529
 24% (-11) — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 9-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 82
Raiders
79.3
1679
0-0 0-0 — — 5.5-1.5 94.9% D1
2 102
Eagles
77.1
1534
0-0 0-0 — — 4.7-2.3 83.1% D2
3 103
Mustangs
77
1529
0-0 0-0 — — 4.7-2.3 82% D1
4 112
Patriots
76.8
1510
0-0 0-0 — — 4.5-2.5 78.5% D2
5 162
Pirates
74
1328
0-0 0-0 — — 3.4-3.6 34.4% —
6 172
Owls
73
1259
0-0 0-0 — — 3-4 22.4% —
7 197
Raiders
70.5
1096
0-0 0-0 — — 2-5 4.7% —
8 246
Titans
61.6
506
0-0 0-0 — — 0.2-6.8 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Garland’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2006
12-3
Rating 676 (91st)
#2 · 2009
9-2
Rating 659 (89th)
#3 · 2011
9-3
Rating 658 (89th)
#4 · 2005
10-3
Rating 647 (87th)
#5 · 2004
8-3
Rating 636 (85th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 5-5 1275 23.2 18.1 +5.1 1239 −9.3 −2.7 −6.5 1337 −3.03 +0.15 −3.18 483(38th)
2024 5-5 1271 17.7 32.4 −14.7 1288 −13.7 +9.8 −23.5 913 −3.22 +0.20 −3.42 424(21st)
2023 7-4 1487 25.8 20.7 +5.1 1348 −6.0 −4.7 −1.3 1467 −2.17 +0.51 −2.68 521(53rd)
2022 5-5 1261 23.2 25.3 −2.1 1378 −7.3 +0.3 −7.5 1311 −3.51 +0.46 −3.97 473(34th)
2021 10-1 1853 51.8 18.8 +33.0 1238 +16.8 −4.5 +21.2 2031 +0.71 +1.31 −0.60 619(82nd)
2020 4-4 1271 32.0 30.0 +2.0 1364 +1.1 +4.7 −3.6 1410 −2.29 +0.32 −2.62 479(36th)
2019 3-7 920 26.5 39.6 −13.1 1323 −4.2 +16.8 −21.0 974 −5.54 +0.15 −5.70 395(14th)
2018 1-9 778 9.9 32.0 −22.1 1367 −19.4 +7.2 −26.6 834 −7.52 +0.02 −7.54 364(9th)
2017 1-9 853 11.9 35.4 −23.5 1312 −19.3 +11.6 −30.9 728 −7.14 +0.01 −7.15 356(8th)
2016 3-7 1132 20.3 35.3 −15.0 1386 −9.4 +10.8 −20.2 995 −4.94 +0.23 −5.17 417(19th)
2015 6-5 1674 35.0 29.5 +5.5 1615 +4.2 −5.8 +9.9 1748 −1.01 +1.66 −2.67 567(67th)
2014 7-3 1569 38.3 36.6 +1.7 1473 +5.6 +3.9 +1.6 1541 −0.51 +1.16 −1.67 530(55th)
2013 5-5 1658 23.2 27.2 −4.0 1566 −4.1 −3.4 −0.7 1483 −1.76 +0.52 −2.29 532(56th)
2012 6-5 1811 26.7 30.7 −4.0 1664 +2.2 −2.2 +4.4 1611 −0.61 +1.26 −1.87 562(66th)
2011 9-3 2003 34.7 13.4 +21.2 1570 +8.3 −14.9 +23.2 2080 +0.93 +2.19 −1.26 658(89th)
2010 7-4 1819 23.4 21.0 +2.4 1655 +0.7 −8.7 +9.4 1735 −0.37 +1.13 −1.50 583(73rd)
2009 9-2 2009 28.2 12.4 +15.8 1581 +5.2 −14.3 +19.5 1987 +0.97 +1.82 −0.85 659(89th)
2008 11-2 1950 25.8 17.6 +8.2 1638 +3.9 −10.8 +14.7 1868 +2.21 +2.76 −0.55 626(84th)
2007 3-7 1552 18.9 31.5 −12.6 1705 −4.5 −1.1 −3.5 1414 −2.81 +0.35 −3.16 517(51st)
2006 12-3 2136 29.5 19.3 +10.3 1788 +7.4 −14.0 +21.3 2033 +3.34 +4.71 −1.36 676(91st)
2005 10-3 2036 26.6 16.8 +9.8 1714 +7.5 −11.8 +19.4 1984 +2.25 +3.25 −1.00 647(87th)
2004 8-3 1948 28.5 15.7 +12.8 1634 +5.6 −12.3 +17.9 1947 +0.85 +2.08 −1.23 636(85th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.