← Back
CLASS 6A · District 9-6A

Garland Sachse Mustangs

Enrollment: 2,866 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 3
Rank
#103
was #103
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1529
#103 of 249
OVR Grade
77
#103 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
—
DEF Grade
—
Perf
—

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
Dallas Jesuit (0-0) 1511
 52% (+1) — — — —
2
@Plano (0-0) 1471
 56% (+2) — — — —
3
Hurst Bell (0-0) 1252
 76% (+11) — — — —
4
@Wylie (0-0) 1328
 70% (+8) — — — —
5
Garland Rowlett (0-0) 1534
 49% (0) — — — —
7
@South Garland (0-0) 506
 > 98% (+41) — — — —
8
@North Garland (0-0) 1096
 86% (+17) — — — —
9
Garland Lakeview Centennial (0-0) 1510
 52% (+1) — — — —
10
@Wylie East (0-0) 1679
 35% (-6) — — — —
11
Garland (0-0) 1259
 76% (+11) — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 9-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 82
Raiders
79.3
1679
0-0 0-0 — — 5.5-1.5 94.9% D1
2 102
Eagles
77.1
1534
0-0 0-0 — — 4.7-2.3 83.1% D2
3 103
Mustangs
77
1529
0-0 0-0 — — 4.7-2.3 82% D1
4 112
Patriots
76.8
1510
0-0 0-0 — — 4.5-2.5 78.5% D2
5 162
Pirates
74
1328
0-0 0-0 — — 3.4-3.6 34.4% —
6 172
Owls
73
1259
0-0 0-0 — — 3-4 22.4% —
7 197
Raiders
70.5
1096
0-0 0-0 — — 2-5 4.7% —
8 246
Titans
61.6
506
0-0 0-0 — — 0.2-6.8 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Garland Sachse’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2017
12-1
Rating 681 (92nd)
#2 · 2016
11-1
Rating 649 (87th)
#3 · 2018
8-4
Rating 628 (84th)
#4 · 2013
11-1
Rating 612 (81st)
#5 · 2024
9-2
Rating 603 (78th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 6-5 1367 24.8 24.9 −0.1 1361 −5.4 +0.6 −6.1 1348 −2.60 +0.30 −2.91 491(41st)
2024 9-2 1790 35.3 16.5 +18.8 1433 +4.3 −9.6 +13.9 1848 +0.71 +1.41 −0.71 603(78th)
2023 8-3 1772 41.4 23.8 +17.5 1467 +12.2 −2.9 +15.0 1876 −0.36 +0.99 −1.35 602(78th)
2022 4-7 1453 31.8 36.1 −4.3 1532 +4.8 +8.3 −3.5 1413 −4.22 +0.26 −4.49 504(46th)
2021 7-4 1625 42.0 31.9 +10.1 1401 +11.0 +5.2 +5.8 1645 −1.25 +1.01 −2.26 546(61st)
2020 3-6 1358 31.1 26.4 +4.7 1375 +0.6 +1.2 −0.6 1486 −4.60 +0.20 −4.80 497(43rd)
2019 8-3 1954 30.9 25.6 +5.3 1482 +3.1 −1.5 +4.5 1613 +0.01 +1.08 −1.08 574(70th)
2018 8-4 1992 35.1 20.0 +15.1 1564 +9.2 −8.7 +17.9 1948 +0.11 +1.17 −1.06 628(84th)
2017 12-1 2168 45.8 14.2 +31.5 1416 +14.7 −12.5 +27.2 2180 +2.21 +2.52 −0.31 681(92nd)
2016 11-1 2140 40.4 17.5 +22.9 1459 +12.0 −9.0 +21.0 2026 +2.66 +2.70 −0.04 649(87th)
2015 7-4 1698 42.2 28.0 +14.2 1556 +12.4 −3.4 +15.8 1895 −0.51 +1.69 −2.19 588(74th)
2014 6-4 1609 43.5 38.3 +5.2 1531 +12.3 +5.1 +7.2 1680 −1.18 +0.99 −2.16 552(63rd)
2013 11-1 2013 46.5 28.5 +18.0 1417 +15.5 +1.6 +13.9 1847 +1.73 +1.79 −0.06 612(81st)
2012 8-3 1818 41.5 28.3 +13.2 1467 +12.7 0.0 +12.7 1817 +0.09 +1.71 −1.62 591(75th)
2011 8-4 1704 38.8 27.9 +10.8 1487 +10.3 +1.1 +9.2 1730 −0.28 +1.45 −1.73 578(71st)
2010 5-4 1411 26.3 16.8 +9.6 1459 −0.8 −8.4 +7.5 1688 −1.99 +0.30 −2.29 545(61st)
2009 4-5 1358 24.2 28.7 −4.4 1522 0.0 +3.6 −3.6 1409 −2.56 +0.78 −3.34 497(43rd)
2008 2-7 1121 24.9 31.4 −6.6 1550 −0.1 +5.1 −5.2 1370 −4.12 +0.40 −4.52 471(34th)
2007 2-8 1055 18.5 29.4 −10.9 1516 −7.9 +2.1 −9.9 1252 −5.65 +0.19 −5.84 451(28th)
2006 3-7 1124 20.9 36.8 −15.9 1475 −6.9 +9.7 −16.5 1087 −4.79 +0.24 −5.04 436(24th)
2005 6-4 1290 25.5 17.6 +7.9 1358 −1.5 −3.9 +2.4 1560 −2.03 +0.45 −2.48 518(51st)
2004 3-7 1012 20.5 28.6 −8.1 1340 −8.5 +6.3 −14.8 1129 −5.07 +0.13 −5.19 435(23rd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.