← Back
CLASS 6A · District 9-6A

Garland Sachse Mustangs

Enrollment: 2,866 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 3
Rank
#69
was #65
Record
6-0
3-0 district
Elo
1785
#69 of 249
OVR Grade
80.9
#69 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
82.9
#52 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
80.2
#70 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1934
#56 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
Dallas Jesuit (4-2) 1660
 52% (+1) W 52-24 2405 +23.4 −12.8 +0.20 —
2
@Plano (2-4) 1451
 70% (+8) W 45-3 2467 +17.5 −21.2 +0.15 —
3
Hurst Bell (3-3) 1286
 83% (+15) W 15-11 1587 −8.3 −11.7 +0.10 —
4
@Wylie (4-2) 1571
 58% (+3) W 44-42 1770 +13.1 +2.3 +0.30 —
5
Garland Rowlett (3-3) 1384
 83% (+15) W 45-35 1644 +14.1 +8.3 +0.12 —
7
@South Garland (2-4) 442
 > 98% (+54) W 61-2 1733 +7.8 −1.6 +0.00 —
8
@North Garland (1-5) 760
 > 98% (+41) — — — — — —
9
Garland Lakeview Centennial (2-4) 1348
 86% (+17) — — — — — —
10
@Wylie East (4-2) 1720
 57% (+3) — — — — — —
11
Garland (2-4) 1176
 93% (+24) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 9-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 69
Mustangs
80.9
1785
 6-0 3-0 43.7 19.5 6.3-0.7 > 98% D1
2 81
Raiders
79.9
1720
 4-2 3-0 44.8 22.2 6.1-0.9 > 98% D2
3 103
Pirates
77.7
1571
 4-2 1-2 43.3 30.8 4.5-2.5 95.7% D1
4 146
Eagles
74.8
1384
 3-3 2-1 31.8 26.2 4.2-2.9 89.4% D2
5 155
Patriots
74.3
1348
 2-4 1-2 25.3 28.0 3.2-3.8 9.6% —
6 181
Owls
71.7
1176
 2-4 1-2 17.7 36.8 2.5-4.5 6.1% —
7 229
Raiders
65.4
760
 1-5 1-2 12.7 42.8 1.2-5.8 < 2% —
8 245
Titans
60.6
442
 2-4 0-3 15.0 42.0 0.1-6.9 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Garland Sachse’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2017
12-1
Rating 681 (92nd)
#2 · 2016
11-1
Rating 649 (87th)
#3 · 2018
8-4
Rating 628 (84th)
#4 · 2013
11-1
Rating 612 (81st)
#5 · 2024
9-2
Rating 603 (78th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 6-5 1367 24.8 24.9 −0.1 1361 −5.4 +0.6 −6.1 1348 −2.60 +0.30 −2.91 491(41st)
2024 9-2 1790 35.3 16.5 +18.8 1433 +4.3 −9.6 +13.9 1848 +0.71 +1.41 −0.71 603(78th)
2023 8-3 1772 41.4 23.8 +17.5 1467 +12.2 −2.9 +15.0 1876 −0.36 +0.99 −1.35 602(78th)
2022 4-7 1453 31.8 36.1 −4.3 1532 +4.8 +8.3 −3.5 1413 −4.22 +0.26 −4.49 504(46th)
2021 7-4 1625 42.0 31.9 +10.1 1401 +11.0 +5.2 +5.8 1645 −1.25 +1.01 −2.26 546(61st)
2020 3-6 1358 31.1 26.4 +4.7 1375 +0.6 +1.2 −0.6 1486 −4.60 +0.20 −4.80 497(43rd)
2019 8-3 1954 30.9 25.6 +5.3 1482 +3.1 −1.5 +4.5 1613 +0.01 +1.08 −1.08 574(70th)
2018 8-4 1992 35.1 20.0 +15.1 1564 +9.2 −8.7 +17.9 1948 +0.11 +1.17 −1.06 628(84th)
2017 12-1 2168 45.8 14.2 +31.5 1416 +14.7 −12.5 +27.2 2180 +2.21 +2.52 −0.31 681(92nd)
2016 11-1 2140 40.4 17.5 +22.9 1459 +12.0 −9.0 +21.0 2026 +2.66 +2.70 −0.04 649(87th)
2015 7-4 1698 42.2 28.0 +14.2 1556 +12.4 −3.4 +15.8 1895 −0.51 +1.69 −2.19 588(74th)
2014 6-4 1609 43.5 38.3 +5.2 1531 +12.3 +5.1 +7.2 1680 −1.18 +0.99 −2.16 552(63rd)
2013 11-1 2013 46.5 28.5 +18.0 1417 +15.5 +1.6 +13.9 1847 +1.73 +1.79 −0.06 612(81st)
2012 8-3 1818 41.5 28.3 +13.2 1467 +12.7 0.0 +12.7 1817 +0.09 +1.71 −1.62 591(75th)
2011 8-4 1704 38.8 27.9 +10.8 1487 +10.3 +1.1 +9.2 1730 −0.28 +1.45 −1.73 578(71st)
2010 5-4 1411 26.3 16.8 +9.6 1459 −0.8 −8.4 +7.5 1688 −1.99 +0.30 −2.29 545(61st)
2009 4-5 1358 24.2 28.7 −4.4 1522 0.0 +3.6 −3.6 1409 −2.56 +0.78 −3.34 497(43rd)
2008 2-7 1121 24.9 31.4 −6.6 1550 −0.1 +5.1 −5.2 1370 −4.12 +0.40 −4.52 471(34th)
2007 2-8 1055 18.5 29.4 −10.9 1516 −7.9 +2.1 −9.9 1252 −5.65 +0.19 −5.84 451(28th)
2006 3-7 1124 20.9 36.8 −15.9 1475 −6.9 +9.7 −16.5 1087 −4.79 +0.24 −5.04 436(24th)
2005 6-4 1290 25.5 17.6 +7.9 1358 −1.5 −3.9 +2.4 1560 −2.03 +0.45 −2.48 518(51st)
2004 3-7 1012 20.5 28.6 −8.1 1340 −8.5 +6.3 −14.8 1129 −5.07 +0.13 −5.19 435(23rd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.