← Back

CLASS 6A · District 9-6A

Garland Rowlett Eagles

Enrollment: 2,024 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 7

Rank

#102

was #102

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1534

#102 of 249

OVR Grade

77.1

#102 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@Hurst Bell (0-0) 1252	77% (+11)	—	—	—	—
2	Crandall	66% (+6)	—	—	—	—
3	@Frisco Wakeland (0-0) 1507	53% (+1)	—	—	—	—
4	South Garland (0-0) 506	> 98% (+41)	—	—	—	—
5	@Garland Sachse (0-0) 1529	51% (+0)	—	—	—	—
7	Garland Lakeview Centennial (0-0) 1510	52% (+1)	—	—	—	—
8	@Wylie East (0-0) 1679	35% (-6)	—	—	—	—
9	Garland (0-0) 1259	76% (+11)	—	—	—	—
10	@Wylie (0-0) 1328	70% (+8)	—	—	—	—
11	@North Garland (0-0) 1096	86% (+18)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 9-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		82	Wylie East (4) Raiders	79.3 1679	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.5-1.5	94.9%	D1
2		102	Garland Rowlett (7) Eagles	77.1 1534	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.7-2.3	83.1%	D2
3		103	Garland Sachse (3) Mustangs	77 1529	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.7-2.3	82%	D1
4		112	Garland Lakeview Centennial (6) Patriots	76.8 1510	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.5-2.5	78.5%	D2
5		162	Wylie (1) Pirates	74 1328	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.4-3.6	34.4%	—
6		172	Garland (5) Owls	73 1259	0-0	0-0	—	—	3-4	22.4%	—
7		197	North Garland (2) Raiders	70.5 1096	0-0	0-0	—	—	2-5	4.7%	—
8		246	South Garland (8) Titans	61.6 506	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.2-6.8	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Garland Rowlett’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2015

10-3

Rating 621 (82nd)

#2 · 2005

9-3

Rating 612 (81st)

#3 · 2011

7-5

Rating 610 (80th)

#4 · 2007

6-6

Rating 603 (78th)

#5 · 2016

9-2

Rating 592 (76th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	6-5	1434	24.9	28.4	−3.5	1335	−4.9	+3.6	−8.6	1286	−2.55	+0.44	−2.99	489(40th)
2024	4-6	1091	15.4	25.3	−9.9	1337	−17.0	+1.3	−18.3	1042	−4.04	+0.17	−4.21	425(21st)
2023	3-7	1128	19.9	34.3	−14.4	1375	−11.1	+8.6	−19.7	1006	−5.48	+0.14	−5.62	428(21st)
2022	4-6	1402	25.2	27.8	−2.6	1270	−6.9	+3.8	−10.6	1235	−4.36	+0.73	−5.09	476(35th)
2021	2-8	1105	19.6	31.4	−11.8	1400	−11.4	+4.0	−15.4	1115	−6.07	+0.06	−6.13	430(22nd)
2020	4-2	1379	28.2	24.8	+3.3	1260	−3.3	+1.5	−4.8	1380	−1.07	+0.73	−1.80	—
2019	4-6	1353	21.8	31.5	−9.7	1512	−7.1	+2.3	−9.4	1266	−3.19	+0.27	−3.47	473(34th)
2018	7-3	1629	31.7	26.0	+5.7	1508	+4.6	−1.4	+6.0	1650	−0.26	+1.08	−1.34	549(62nd)
2017	6-5	1686	29.5	28.2	+1.4	1531	+1.6	−0.5	+2.1	1552	−1.35	+1.09	−2.44	542(59th)
2016	9-2	1903	33.6	21.8	+11.8	1477	+5.8	−5.6	+11.4	1786	+1.55	+2.33	−0.78	592(76th)
2015	10-3	1996	41.5	30.2	+11.3	1633	+12.6	−4.9	+17.5	1938	+1.89	+3.03	−1.14	621(82nd)
2014	8-4	1764	29.2	22.9	+6.3	1505	−2.2	−9.8	+7.6	1690	−0.34	+1.64	−1.98	578(71st)
2013	4-7	1438	28.1	32.7	−4.6	1558	+0.6	+2.9	−2.2	1444	−3.87	+0.50	−4.38	507(47th)
2012	4-7	1549	25.6	27.6	−2.0	1547	−1.3	−1.9	+0.6	1514	−3.92	+0.48	−4.41	526(54th)
2011	7-5	1868	34.5	25.2	+9.3	1581	+9.2	−3.9	+13.0	1826	−0.90	+1.65	−2.55	610(80th)
2010	9-3	1802	28.0	24.2	+3.8	1625	+5.5	−5.0	+10.5	1763	+1.11	+2.53	−1.42	591(75th)
2009	4-7	1727	20.0	21.4	−1.4	1666	−1.4	−7.4	+6.0	1649	−2.83	+0.85	−3.68	562(66th)
2008	7-4	1850	25.0	23.4	+1.6	1693	+2.7	−7.2	+9.9	1747	+0.07	+2.18	−2.11	587(74th)
2007	6-6	1759	26.5	26.2	+0.2	1793	+4.9	−6.2	+11.1	1778	−0.92	+1.97	−2.89	603(78th)
2006	4-7	1603	20.8	27.7	−6.9	1700	−2.9	−3.0	+0.2	1505	−2.56	+0.38	−2.94	535(57th)
2005	9-3	1834	29.8	21.5	+8.2	1676	+9.0	−6.2	+15.2	1880	+0.99	+2.38	−1.39	612(81st)
2004	5-5	1499	18.2	24.4	−6.2	1577	−4.9	−2.6	−2.3	1442	−2.53	+0.91	−3.44	520(52nd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.