← Back

CLASS 6A · District 9-6A

Garland Rowlett Eagles

Enrollment: 2,024 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 7

Rank

#146

was #158

Record

3-3

2-1 district

Elo

1384

#146 of 249

OVR Grade

74.8

#146 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

74.8

#128 of 249 in 6A

DEF Grade

71.7

#161 of 249 in 6A

Perf

1397

#139 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	AOS	ADS	WQ	LQ
1	@Hurst Bell (3-3) 1286	77% (+11)	L 7-27	987	−16.3	+4.3	—	−0.92
2	Crandall	57% (+3)	W 26-15	1486	−7.8	−7.2	+0.09	—
3	@Frisco Wakeland (2-4) 1457	45% (-2)	L 36-39	1288	+7.1	+15.6	—	−0.83
4	South Garland (2-4) 442	98% (+35)	W 55-0	1633	+1.8	−3.6	+0.00	—
5	@Garland Sachse (6-0) 1785	17% (-15)	L 35-45	1630	+11.7	+6.5	—	−0.59
7	Garland Lakeview Centennial (2-4) 1348	48% (-1)	W 32-31	1356	+1.7	+7.4	+0.12	—
8	@Wylie East (4-2) 1720	20% (-13)	—	—	—	—	—	—
9	Garland (2-4) 1176	70% (+8)	—	—	—	—	—	—
10	@Wylie (4-2) 1571	31% (-7)	—	—	—	—	—	—
11	@North Garland (1-5) 760	93% (+25)	—	—	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 9-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		69	Garland Sachse (3) Mustangs	80.9 1785	6-0	3-0	43.7	19.5	6.3-0.7	> 98%	D1
2		81	Wylie East (4) Raiders	79.9 1720	4-2	3-0	44.8	22.2	6.1-0.9	> 98%	D2
3		103	Wylie (1) Pirates	77.7 1571	4-2	1-2	43.3	30.8	4.5-2.5	95.7%	D1
4		146	Garland Rowlett (7) Eagles	74.8 1384	3-3	2-1	31.8	26.2	4.2-2.9	89.4%	D2
5		155	Garland Lakeview Centennial (6) Patriots	74.3 1348	2-4	1-2	25.3	28.0	3.2-3.8	9.6%	—
6		181	Garland (5) Owls	71.7 1176	2-4	1-2	17.7	36.8	2.5-4.5	6.1%	—
7		229	North Garland (2) Raiders	65.4 760	1-5	1-2	12.7	42.8	1.2-5.8	< 2%	—
8		245	South Garland (8) Titans	60.6 442	2-4	0-3	15.0	42.0	0.1-6.9	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Garland Rowlett’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2015

10-3

Rating 621 (82nd)

#2 · 2005

9-3

Rating 612 (81st)

#3 · 2011

7-5

Rating 610 (80th)

#4 · 2007

6-6

Rating 603 (78th)

#5 · 2016

9-2

Rating 592 (76th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	6-5	1434	24.9	28.4	−3.5	1335	−4.9	+3.6	−8.6	1286	−2.55	+0.44	−2.99	489(40th)
2024	4-6	1091	15.4	25.3	−9.9	1337	−17.0	+1.3	−18.3	1042	−4.04	+0.17	−4.21	425(21st)
2023	3-7	1128	19.9	34.3	−14.4	1375	−11.1	+8.6	−19.7	1006	−5.48	+0.14	−5.62	428(21st)
2022	4-6	1402	25.2	27.8	−2.6	1270	−6.9	+3.8	−10.6	1235	−4.36	+0.73	−5.09	476(35th)
2021	2-8	1105	19.6	31.4	−11.8	1400	−11.4	+4.0	−15.4	1115	−6.07	+0.06	−6.13	430(22nd)
2020	4-2	1379	28.2	24.8	+3.3	1260	−3.3	+1.5	−4.8	1380	−1.07	+0.73	−1.80	—
2019	4-6	1353	21.8	31.5	−9.7	1512	−7.1	+2.3	−9.4	1266	−3.19	+0.27	−3.47	473(34th)
2018	7-3	1629	31.7	26.0	+5.7	1508	+4.6	−1.4	+6.0	1650	−0.26	+1.08	−1.34	549(62nd)
2017	6-5	1686	29.5	28.2	+1.4	1531	+1.6	−0.5	+2.1	1552	−1.35	+1.09	−2.44	542(59th)
2016	9-2	1903	33.6	21.8	+11.8	1477	+5.8	−5.6	+11.4	1786	+1.55	+2.33	−0.78	592(76th)
2015	10-3	1996	41.5	30.2	+11.3	1633	+12.6	−4.9	+17.5	1938	+1.89	+3.03	−1.14	621(82nd)
2014	8-4	1764	29.2	22.9	+6.3	1505	−2.2	−9.8	+7.6	1690	−0.34	+1.64	−1.98	578(71st)
2013	4-7	1438	28.1	32.7	−4.6	1558	+0.6	+2.9	−2.2	1444	−3.87	+0.50	−4.38	507(47th)
2012	4-7	1549	25.6	27.6	−2.0	1547	−1.3	−1.9	+0.6	1514	−3.92	+0.48	−4.41	526(54th)
2011	7-5	1868	34.5	25.2	+9.3	1581	+9.2	−3.9	+13.0	1826	−0.90	+1.65	−2.55	610(80th)
2010	9-3	1802	28.0	24.2	+3.8	1625	+5.5	−5.0	+10.5	1763	+1.11	+2.53	−1.42	591(75th)
2009	4-7	1727	20.0	21.4	−1.4	1666	−1.4	−7.4	+6.0	1649	−2.83	+0.85	−3.68	562(66th)
2008	7-4	1850	25.0	23.4	+1.6	1693	+2.7	−7.2	+9.9	1747	+0.07	+2.18	−2.11	587(74th)
2007	6-6	1759	26.5	26.2	+0.2	1793	+4.9	−6.2	+11.1	1778	−0.92	+1.97	−2.89	603(78th)
2006	4-7	1603	20.8	27.7	−6.9	1700	−2.9	−3.0	+0.2	1505	−2.56	+0.38	−2.94	535(57th)
2005	9-3	1834	29.8	21.5	+8.2	1676	+9.0	−6.2	+15.2	1880	+0.99	+2.38	−1.39	612(81st)
2004	5-5	1499	18.2	24.4	−6.2	1577	−4.9	−2.6	−2.3	1442	−2.53	+0.91	−3.44	520(52nd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.