← Back
CLASS 6A · District 9-6A

Garland Lakeview Centennial Patriots

Enrollment: 2,080 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6
Rank
#155
was #153
Record
2-4
1-2 district
Elo
1348
#155 of 249
OVR Grade
74.3
#155 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
70.7
#170 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
72.4
#153 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1271
#161 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
Grand Prairie (3-3) 962
 96% (+30) W 38-0 1718 +0.9 −7.8 +0.01 —
2
Red Oak (4-2) 1711
 33% (-7) L 6-38 830 −18.3 +8.5 — −0.67
3
@McKinney North
 46% (-2) L 21-31 1309 −5.8 +1.8 — −0.82
4
@Garland (2-4) 1176
 61% (+4) W 34-14 1457 −4.3 −2.5 +0.08 —
5
Wylie (4-2) 1571
 33% (-7) L 22-53 945 −8.9 +13.3 — −0.73
7
@Garland Rowlett (3-3) 1384
 52% (+1) L 31-32 1369 +0.1 +5.3 — −0.89
8
South Garland (2-4) 442
 98% (+36) — — — — — —
9
@Garland Sachse (6-0) 1785
 14% (-17) — — — — — —
10
@North Garland (1-5) 760
 92% (+24) — — — — — —
11
Wylie East (4-2) 1720
 17% (-15) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 9-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 69
Mustangs
80.9
1785
 6-0 3-0 43.7 19.5 6.3-0.7 > 98% D1
2 81
Raiders
79.9
1720
 4-2 3-0 44.8 22.2 6.1-0.9 > 98% D2
3 103
Pirates
77.7
1571
 4-2 1-2 43.3 30.8 4.5-2.5 95.7% D1
4 146
Eagles
74.8
1384
 3-3 2-1 31.8 26.2 4.2-2.9 89.4% D2
5 155
Patriots
74.3
1348
 2-4 1-2 25.3 28.0 3.2-3.8 9.6% —
6 181
Owls
71.7
1176
 2-4 1-2 17.7 36.8 2.5-4.5 6.1% —
7 229
Raiders
65.4
760
 1-5 1-2 12.7 42.8 1.2-5.8 < 2% —
8 245
Titans
60.6
442
 2-4 0-3 15.0 42.0 0.1-6.9 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Garland Lakeview Centennial’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2016
8-4
Rating 549 (62nd)
#2 · 2018
5-4
Rating 519 (52nd)
#3 · 2005
3-7
Rating 511 (49th)
#4 · 2015
5-5
Rating 511 (48th)
#5 · 2012
5-5
Rating 508 (48th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 3-7 977 22.0 21.3 +0.7 1250 −9.6 +1.2 −10.8 1230 −5.67 +0.15 −5.82 440(24th)
2024 3-7 1175 18.8 29.3 −10.5 1362 −11.2 +5.8 −17.1 1074 −4.95 +0.07 −5.03 438(24th)
2023 6-4 1384 28.9 26.5 +2.4 1286 −2.8 +2.7 −5.5 1363 −2.75 +0.28 −3.04 499(44th)
2022 5-5 1369 25.1 23.2 +1.9 1285 −6.5 +0.3 −6.8 1329 −3.43 +0.55 −3.98 485(39th)
2021 5-5 1246 25.6 24.8 +0.8 1252 −9.4 0.0 −9.4 1265 −3.79 +0.28 −4.07 462(31st)
2020 4-1 1579 36.8 20.2 +16.6 1236 +4.0 −1.1 +5.1 1627 −0.39 +0.50 −0.89 —
2019 6-5 1378 28.5 22.3 +6.2 1311 −3.0 −1.1 −1.9 1453 −3.13 +0.47 −3.60 500(44th)
2018 5-4 1450 31.1 20.8 +10.3 1277 +0.7 −1.2 +1.9 1546 −2.55 +0.40 −2.95 519(52nd)
2017 4-7 1317 30.6 38.7 −8.1 1414 −0.6 +11.4 −11.9 1202 −4.43 +0.16 −4.59 462(31st)
2016 8-4 1600 40.3 31.6 +8.8 1392 +10.1 +6.2 +3.9 1597 −1.18 +0.90 −2.07 549(62nd)
2015 5-5 1383 35.7 33.0 +2.7 1453 +2.4 +1.2 +1.2 1531 −2.78 +0.32 −3.10 511(48th)
2014 4-6 1304 29.9 30.1 −0.2 1407 −4.6 −0.7 −3.9 1403 −3.54 +0.24 −3.78 487(39th)
2013 3-6 1143 31.3 36.7 −5.3 1381 +1.0 +11.5 −10.4 1240 −4.47 +0.13 −4.60 452(28th)
2012 5-5 1285 29.7 22.6 +7.1 1404 −1.2 −3.5 +2.3 1557 −2.87 +1.17 −4.04 508(48th)
2011 2-7 1098 8.4 36.3 −27.9 1575 −17.2 +6.9 −24.1 898 −4.20 +0.08 −4.28 406(16th)
2010 1-8 1089 14.1 32.6 −18.4 1645 −7.8 +4.6 −12.5 1188 −5.37 +0.05 −5.42 444(26th)
2009 3-7 1156 17.2 29.6 −12.4 1512 −7.7 +4.5 −12.2 1195 −4.41 +0.24 −4.65 450(28th)
2008 3-7 1202 15.7 23.2 −7.5 1513 −10.6 −3.0 −7.6 1311 −4.25 +0.23 −4.48 471(33rd)
2007 5-5 1317 22.8 29.3 −6.5 1417 −4.4 +4.0 −8.4 1289 −2.36 +0.90 −3.26 480(36th)
2006 1-9 961 22.8 33.3 −10.5 1435 −6.1 +7.1 −13.2 1170 −6.99 +0.04 −7.03 432(23rd)
2005 3-7 1379 18.5 28.5 −10.0 1726 −0.9 +0.3 −1.2 1471 −3.42 +0.30 −3.71 511(49th)
2004 3-7 1262 16.3 28.8 −12.5 1582 −6.7 +2.2 −8.9 1277 −4.49 +0.29 −4.79 477(35th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.