| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Richland |
37% (-5) | L 7-42 | 870 | −16.1 | +9.1 | — | −0.72 |
| 2 | @Justin Northwest (0-6) 1148 |
60% (+4) | W 27-21 | 1415 | −5.8 | −2.4 | +0.10 | — |
| 3 | Garland Rowlett (3-3) 1384 |
55% (+2) | W 39-36 | 1469 | +8.1 | +9.3 | +0.14 | — |
| 5 | 2% (-36) | L 7-35 | 1579 | −4.6 | −7.8 | — | −0.09 | |
| 6 | #9Lewisville (3-3) 2457 |
4% (-31) | L 8-38 | 1782 | −0.9 | −12.2 | — | −0.14 |
| 7 | @Lewisville Hebron (4-2) 1854 |
22% (-12) | L 10-38 | 1017 | −11.9 | +7.5 | — | −0.54 |
| 8 | Flower Mound (5-1) 1720 |
25% (-11) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | @Denton Braswell (5-1) 1736 |
24% (-11) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | Little Elm (3-3) 1426 |
53% (+1) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | @Flower Mound Marcus (2-4) 1424 |
53% (+1) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#131
was #120
Record
2-4
0-3 district
Elo
1457
#131 of 249
OVR Grade
76
#131 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
71.3
#163 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
74.5
#127 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1355
#148 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 5-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Frisco Wakeland’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.