← Back

CLASS 6A · District 8-6A

Fort Worth Haltom Buffaloes

Enrollment: 2,524 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5

Rank

#147

was #147

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1386

#147 of 249

OVR Grade

74.9

#147 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@Fort Worth Brewer	54% (+1)	—	—	—	—
2	Richland	26% (-10)	—	—	—	—
3	@Arlington Bowie (0-0) 1696	21% (-12)	—	—	—	—
5	Grand Prairie (0-0) 766	93% (+25)	—	—	—	—
6	@Irving Nimitz (0-0) 487	98% (+36)	—	—	—	—
7	Hurst Bell (0-0) 1252	64% (+5)	—	—	—	—
8	South Grand Prairie (0-0) 1816	14% (-17)	—	—	—	—
9	@Irving (0-0) 522	97% (+35)	—	—	—	—
10	Euless Trinity (0-0) 1856	12% (-19)	—	—	—	—
11	@Irving MacArthur (0-0) 1019	82% (+15)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 8-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		53	Euless Trinity (1) Trojans	82 1856	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.3-0.7	> 98%	D1
2		60	South Grand Prairie (2) Warriors	81.4 1816	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.2-0.8	> 98%	D1
3		147	Fort Worth Haltom (5) Buffaloes	74.9 1386	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.6-2.4	92.1%	D2
4		173	Hurst Bell (3) Blue Raiders	72.9 1252	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-3	79.1%	D2
5		204	Irving MacArthur (6) Cardinals	69.3 1019	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.1-3.9	24.9%	—
6		229	Grand Prairie (4) Gophers	65.5 766	0-0	0-0	—	—	2-5	3.4%	—
7		245	Irving (8) Tigers	61.8 522	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-6	< 2%	—
8		247	Irving Nimitz (7) Vikings	61.3 487	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.9-6.1	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Fort Worth Haltom’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2018

13-1

Rating 658 (89th)

#2 · 2005

5-5

Rating 545 (60th)

#3 · 2019

4-6

Rating 507 (47th)

#4 · 2004

3-7

Rating 500 (44th)

#5 · 2017

6-5

Rating 488 (39th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	4-7	1218	30.5	31.3	−0.7	1383	−2.4	+2.5	−4.9	1377	−4.71	+0.36	−5.07	481(37th)
2024	6-5	1299	27.4	29.8	−2.5	1219	−9.5	+3.7	−13.2	1170	−3.45	+0.70	−4.15	462(31st)
2023	2-8	1008	23.7	34.3	−10.6	1630	−3.5	+1.9	−5.5	1363	−4.63	+0.19	−4.82	465(32nd)
2022	0-10	967	14.7	46.0	−31.3	1709	−10.9	+12.1	−23.1	923	−6.36	0.00	−6.36	395(14th)
2021	3-7	1136	24.6	34.9	−10.3	1436	−6.1	+7.7	−13.8	1155	−4.91	+0.07	−4.99	437(24th)
2020	5-5	1416	23.8	27.1	−3.3	1516	−3.6	+1.5	−5.1	1372	−2.48	+0.29	−2.77	487(39th)
2019	4-6	1453	30.7	30.1	+0.6	1479	+0.6	+2.4	−1.8	1454	−3.94	+1.15	−5.10	507(47th)
2018	13-1	2115	45.9	25.4	+20.5	1572	+18.9	−3.9	+22.9	2071	+4.05	+4.28	−0.23	658(89th)
2017	6-5	1369	30.9	30.8	+0.1	1341	+2.0	+7.5	−5.5	1363	−2.59	+0.73	−3.32	488(39th)
2016	4-6	1028	29.9	29.8	+0.1	1344	−2.4	+3.2	−5.6	1360	−4.17	+0.20	−4.38	456(29th)
2015	1-9	852	9.5	38.4	−28.9	1635	−15.6	+7.4	−23.0	926	−5.43	+0.23	−5.66	382(12th)
2014	0-10	803	7.8	41.5	−33.7	1705	−16.9	+9.3	−26.2	845	−6.46	0.00	−6.46	368(9th)
2013	3-7	1121	17.7	30.0	−12.3	1520	−8.6	+1.8	−10.4	1240	−4.32	+0.26	−4.58	451(28th)
2012	2-8	1131	23.5	29.6	−6.1	1492	−3.0	+4.0	−7.0	1325	−5.85	+0.24	−6.09	464(31st)
2011	4-6	1299	25.2	28.8	−3.6	1445	−2.5	+4.2	−6.7	1332	−3.25	+0.50	−3.75	482(37th)
2010	2-8	967	14.5	37.6	−23.1	1528	−11.8	+10.4	−22.2	946	−5.42	+0.15	−5.57	401(15th)
2009	5-6	1308	16.9	26.4	−9.5	1492	−11.3	−2.0	−9.4	1266	−3.26	+1.00	−4.26	473(34th)
2008	2-8	1100	19.9	33.7	−13.8	1389	−8.1	+8.3	−16.5	1088	−5.71	+0.06	−5.76	432(22nd)
2007	2-8	1159	14.6	32.3	−17.7	1565	−10.8	+4.1	−14.8	1129	−5.23	+0.21	−5.45	444(26th)
2006	3-7	1190	27.2	35.9	−8.7	1618	+1.7	+6.3	−4.6	1385	−4.24	+0.65	−4.89	481(37th)
2005	5-5	1531	28.3	27.8	+0.5	1632	+2.4	−2.5	+4.9	1622	−1.95	+0.68	−2.62	545(60th)
2004	3-7	1291	26.2	34.9	−8.7	1641	+1.2	+3.9	−2.7	1433	−3.75	+0.43	−4.17	500(44th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.