← Back
CLASS 6A · District 21-6A

Fort Bend Travis Tigers

Enrollment: 3,175 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 1
Rank
#105
was #105
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1526
#105 of 249
OVR Grade
77
#105 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@Richmond Foster (0-0) 1325
70% (+8)
2
@Fort Bend Marshall
21% (-13)
3
#36Cy Falls (0-0) 1963
14% (-17)
4 97% (+32)
5
@Fort Bend Austin (0-0) 901
93% (+25)
6
Fort Bend Elkins (0-0) 1292
73% (+9)
7
@Fort Bend Bush (0-0) 1433
60% (+4)
9 28% (-9)
10
#19Fort Bend Ridge Point (0-0) 2225
5% (-28)
11
@Strake Jesuit (0-0) 1623
40% (-4)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 21-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 19
Panthers
87.5
2225
0-0 0-0 6.7-0.3 > 98% D2
2 65
Hurricanes
80.5
1756
0-0 0-0 5.1-1.9 94% D2
3 88
Crusaders
78.5
1623
0-0 0-0 4.4-2.5 82.5% D1
4 105
Tigers
77
1526
0-0 0-0 4-3 67.2% D1
5 138
Broncos
75.6
1433
0-0 0-0 3.5-3.5 41%
6 168
Knights
73.5
1292
0-0 0-0 2.7-4.3 14.9%
7 221
Bulldogs
67.6
901
0-0 0-0 1.1-5.9 < 2%
8 237
Rangers
64.8
718
0-0 0-0 0.5-6.5 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Fort Bend Travis’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2019
10-1
Rating 623 (83rd)
#2 · 2018
8-3
Rating 572 (69th)
#3 · 2012
8-5
Rating 567 (67th)
#4 · 2016
7-4
Rating 566 (67th)
#5 · 2021
6-5
Rating 566 (67th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 8-3 1714 37.7 30.5 +7.2 1452 +5.5 +0.3 +5.1 1629 +0.91 +1.40 −0.49 559(65th)
2024 5-6 1382 22.0 29.2 −7.2 1439 −6.7 +3.0 −9.7 1257 −2.83 +0.15 −2.98 480(37th)
2023 7-4 1566 22.9 22.0 +0.9 1454 −5.8 −5.1 −0.7 1482 −0.73 +0.63 −1.36 531(56th)
2022 4-6 1385 21.1 32.0 −10.9 1400 −6.4 +8.9 −15.3 1118 −3.44 +0.16 −3.61 458(30th)
2021 6-5 1614 28.0 19.8 +8.2 1594 +4.6 −7.3 +11.9 1798 −1.17 +0.93 −2.10 566(67th)
2020 4-4 1744 26.5 19.6 +6.9 1542 +0.1 −6.7 +6.8 1671 −1.90 +0.21 −2.10 556(64th)
2019 10-1 1962 43.0 24.1 +18.9 1464 +16.3 −2.9 +19.2 1979 +1.77 +2.12 −0.35 623(83rd)
2018 8-3 1761 44.0 35.9 +8.1 1483 +15.4 +6.4 +9.0 1724 +0.30 +1.29 −0.98 572(69th)
2017 5-5 1521 35.2 27.5 +7.7 1505 +7.7 −0.1 +7.8 1695 −1.90 +0.48 −2.38 546(61st)
2016 7-4 1664 40.8 32.4 +8.5 1535 +12.2 +2.4 +9.8 1744 −0.78 +1.43 −2.21 566(67th)
2015 6-5 1516 28.5 34.0 −5.5 1514 +2.8 +8.1 −5.3 1367 −1.74 +0.76 −2.50 501(45th)
2014 7-5 1606 30.4 35.0 −4.6 1553 +4.8 +5.9 −1.2 1471 −1.26 +1.14 −2.39 535(57th)
2013 3-6 1410 33.0 35.1 −2.1 1551 +4.8 +3.9 +1.0 1524 −3.80 +0.17 −3.97 515(50th)
2012 8-5 1725 31.7 31.2 +0.5 1597 +7.2 +2.7 +4.5 1611 −0.61 +2.68 −3.29 567(67th)
2011 4-6 1333 22.8 27.7 −4.9 1565 −2.4 +1.7 −4.1 1396 −3.22 +0.20 −3.42 493(42nd)
2010 6-5 1652 20.6 18.8 +1.8 1478 −6.3 −8.6 +2.3 1557 −1.54 +0.92 −2.46 545(60th)
2009 5-5 1322 25.7 25.2 +0.5 1339 −0.6 +5.3 −5.9 1353 −3.21 +0.29 −3.50 486(39th)
2008 6-3 1497 26.3 18.9 +7.4 1435 −0.4 −5.0 +4.7 1616 −1.18 +0.92 −2.10 538(58th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.