← Back
CLASS 6A · District 21-6A

Fort Bend Hightower Hurricanes

Enrollment: 2,232 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 8
Rank
#63
was #62
Record
5-2
4-0 district
Elo
1828
#63 of 249
OVR Grade
81.6
#63 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
81.5
#62 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
86.1
#32 of 249 in 6A
Perf
2057
#44 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
#25Cy Ranch (5-1) 2165
 23% (-11) L 7-24 1904 −1.4 −17.6 — −0.31
2
@Cy Springs (2-4) 1559
 63% (+5) L 30-33 1653 +1.0 −5.2 — −0.75
3
Richmond Foster (2-4) 1233
 76% (+11) W 54-0 2481 +23.0 −16.3 +0.12 —
4
Fort Bend Elkins (2-5) 1464
 75% (+11) W 40-0 2434 +11.9 −25.5 +0.15 —
5
@Strake Jesuit (2-5) 1493
 78% (+12) W 40-28 1779 +15.6 +4.5 +0.16 —
6
@Fort Bend Bush (1-6) 1215
 91% (+22) W 41-6 1975 +8.3 −10.7 +0.08 —
7
Fort Bend Clements (3-4) 1095
 95% (+29) W 42-3 2174 +6.2 −20.8 +0.04 —
9
@Fort Bend Travis (6-1) 1770
 56% (+2) — — — — — —
10
Fort Bend Austin (1-6) 869
 > 98% (+38) — — — — — —
11
@#10Fort Bend Ridge Point (7-0) 2445
 7% (-25) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 21-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 10
Panthers
90.9
2445
 7-0 4-0 41.9 12.9 6.9-0.1 > 98% D2
2 63
Hurricanes
81.6
1828
 5-2 4-0 36.3 13.4 5.6-1.4 > 98% D2
3 71
Tigers
80.7
1770
 6-1 4-0 32.7 21.0 5.3-1.7 > 98% D1
4 124
Crusaders
76.5
1493
 2-5 2-2 18.4 27.4 3.5-3.5 59.2% D1
5 127
Knights
76.1
1464
 2-5 1-3 22.0 31.0 3.2-3.8 38.9% —
6 174
Broncos
72.3
1215
 1-6 1-3 12.4 35.4 1.9-5.1 < 2% —
7 193
Rangers
70.5
1095
 3-4 0-4 26.7 33.9 1.3-5.7 < 2% —
8 217
Bulldogs
67.1
869
 1-6 0-4 19.3 30.3 0.4-6.6 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Fort Bend Hightower’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2008
13-1
Rating 752 (97th)
#2 · 2011
13-3
Rating 699 (94th)
#3 · 2023
12-2
Rating 693 (93rd)
#4 · 2009
11-1
Rating 672 (91st)
#5 · 2022
10-3
Rating 639 (86th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 7-4 1670 41.9 31.0 +10.9 1455 +8.9 +1.0 +7.9 1698 −0.66 +1.05 −1.71 566(67th)
2024 9-2 1910 40.6 15.2 +25.5 1400 +9.6 −10.2 +19.8 1995 +0.78 +1.75 −0.97 636(85th)
2023 12-2 2169 42.5 16.8 +25.7 1568 +16.3 −12.2 +28.5 2212 +2.78 +3.24 −0.45 693(93rd)
2022 10-3 1934 36.8 15.9 +20.9 1522 +9.9 −11.0 +20.9 2022 +1.04 +1.70 −0.67 639(86th)
2021 1-1 1623 19.0 19.0 0.0 1939 +2.8 −13.3 +16.1 1903 −0.11 +0.03 −0.14 —
2020 1-1 1625 28.0 31.5 −3.5 2026 +9.8 −4.4 +14.2 1855 +0.42 +0.54 −0.11 —
2019 1-1 1537 33.0 20.5 +12.5 1501 +4.0 −7.3 +11.3 1783 −0.41 +0.19 −0.60 —
2018 0-2 1386 20.5 27.0 −6.5 1679 −9.4 −10.0 +0.6 1514 −1.64 0.00 −1.64 —
2017 5-5 1529 23.3 19.2 +4.1 1446 −5.7 −7.2 +1.5 1537 −2.38 +0.39 −2.77 525(54th)
2016 5-5 1686 33.8 36.0 −2.2 1509 +5.5 +6.9 −1.4 1466 −1.49 +1.14 −2.63 531(55th)
2015 10-1 1844 31.2 13.9 +17.3 1364 +2.6 −9.0 +11.6 1790 +0.98 +1.57 −0.59 600(77th)
2014 7-4 1632 19.4 16.8 +2.5 1366 −9.6 −7.3 −2.3 1442 −2.21 +0.84 −3.05 527(54th)
2013 8-4 1816 22.7 21.7 +1.0 1625 −3.0 −10.0 +6.9 1673 −0.17 +1.38 −1.54 571(69th)
2012 5-5 1670 23.9 19.8 +4.1 1564 −1.0 −7.5 +6.5 1663 −2.81 +0.62 −3.43 557(64th)
2011 13-3 2377 36.3 22.4 +13.9 1688 +14.2 −6.1 +20.3 2007 +3.88 +4.81 −0.93 699(94th)
2010 9-3 2025 37.3 26.7 +10.7 1546 +11.1 −1.5 +12.6 1815 +0.93 +1.98 −1.05 623(83rd)
2009 11-1 2246 31.9 10.1 +21.8 1372 +6.3 −11.2 +17.5 1938 +1.46 +1.80 −0.34 672(91st)
2008 13-1 2356 36.6 11.7 +24.9 1631 +14.6 −16.6 +31.2 2279 +4.58 +4.61 −0.03 752(97th)
2007 10-4 1921 25.8 15.4 +10.4 1515 +3.6 −7.6 +11.2 1779 +0.05 +2.23 −2.18 622(83rd)
2006 9-4 1652 23.5 22.0 +1.5 1433 −0.3 −0.6 +0.4 1509 −1.00 +1.56 −2.56 550(62nd)
2005 5-5 1259 20.7 24.5 −3.8 1422 −3.9 +3.2 −7.2 1321 −3.25 +1.22 −4.47 480(37th)
2004 10-1 1876 30.5 13.0 +17.5 1354 +6.0 −5.8 +11.8 1794 +1.13 +1.35 −0.22 616(81st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.