← Back
CLASS 6A · District 21-6A

Fort Bend Elkins Knights

Enrollment: 2,869 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 3
Rank
#168
was #168
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1292
#168 of 249
OVR Grade
73.5
#168 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
—
DEF Grade
—
Perf
—

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@Katy Mayde Creek (0-0) 1364
 43% (-3) — — — —
2
Pearland Dawson (0-0) 1843
 9% (-22) — — — —
3
@Clear Falls (0-0) 1685
 16% (-16) — — — —
4
@Fort Bend Hightower (0-0) 1756
 13% (-19) — — — —
5
Fort Bend Bush (0-0) 1433
 36% (-6) — — — —
6
@Fort Bend Travis (0-0) 1526
 27% (-9) — — — —
7
#19Fort Bend Ridge Point (0-0) 2225
 < 2% (-37) — — — —
9
@Strake Jesuit (0-0) 1623
 20% (-13) — — — —
10
Fort Bend Clements (0-0) 718
 92% (+23) — — — —
11
@Fort Bend Austin (0-0) 901
 84% (+16) — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 21-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 19
Panthers
87.5
2225
0-0 0-0 — — 6.7-0.3 > 98% D2
2 65
Hurricanes
80.5
1756
0-0 0-0 — — 5.1-1.9 94% D2
3 88
Crusaders
78.5
1623
0-0 0-0 — — 4.4-2.5 82.5% D1
4 105
Tigers
77
1526
0-0 0-0 — — 4-3 67.2% D1
5 138
Broncos
75.6
1433
0-0 0-0 — — 3.5-3.5 41% —
6 168
Knights
73.5
1292
0-0 0-0 — — 2.7-4.3 14.9% —
7 221
Bulldogs
67.6
901
0-0 0-0 — — 1.1-5.9 < 2% —
8 237
Rangers
64.8
718
0-0 0-0 — — 0.5-6.5 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Fort Bend Elkins’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2013
10-3
Rating 637 (85th)
#2 · 2019
8-3
Rating 570 (69th)
#3 · 2011
8-3
Rating 568 (68th)
#4 · 2010
7-4
Rating 553 (63rd)
#5 · 2024
7-5
Rating 523 (53rd)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 5-5 1213 31.5 31.2 +0.3 1267 −3.6 +5.6 −9.1 1272 −3.00 +0.23 −3.23 467(32nd)
2024 7-5 1408 30.2 26.0 +4.2 1402 −0.7 +0.3 −0.9 1476 −1.31 +1.25 −2.57 523(53rd)
2023 2-8 889 16.3 36.6 −20.3 1391 −13.9 +12.2 −26.1 846 −5.67 +0.04 −5.70 385(12th)
2022 2-8 937 16.0 25.2 −9.2 1352 −14.7 +4.0 −18.7 1032 −6.18 +0.04 −6.22 407(16th)
2021 2-7 1214 16.0 25.7 −9.7 1436 −11.0 +1.3 −12.3 1193 −4.52 +0.03 −4.55 449(27th)
2020 2-5 1434 16.9 23.0 −6.1 1650 −5.6 −5.6 0.0 1499 −2.88 +0.09 −2.97 —
2019 8-3 1616 42.3 21.5 +20.7 1325 +11.6 −1.1 +12.7 1817 −0.96 +0.51 −1.47 570(69th)
2018 7-4 1550 30.1 24.7 +5.4 1311 −2.8 −1.5 −1.3 1467 −1.75 +0.64 −2.40 518(51st)
2017 0-1 1622 23.0 34.0 −11.0 1521 −4.4 +0.1 −4.5 1387 −0.69 0.00 −0.69 —
2016 0-3 1736 13.7 29.7 −16.0 1788 −6.6 −4.3 −2.3 1443 −1.94 0.00 −1.94 —
2015 2-0 2225 25.0 13.5 +11.5 1858 +5.5 −22.2 +27.7 2191 +1.11 +1.11 0.00 —
2014 2-0 2153 36.5 20.0 +16.5 1913 +14.0 −22.4 +36.4 2411 +1.23 +1.23 0.00 —
2013 10-3 2008 40.6 24.4 +16.2 1583 +13.0 −6.2 +19.2 1979 +1.56 +2.48 −0.92 637(85th)
2012 4-6 1407 25.3 29.4 −4.1 1562 +0.4 +2.5 −2.1 1447 −3.67 +0.59 −4.26 505(46th)
2011 8-3 1762 27.5 20.0 +7.5 1510 +1.2 −5.4 +6.6 1665 −0.30 +1.22 −1.52 568(68th)
2010 7-4 1586 30.6 21.7 +8.9 1447 +2.8 −4.0 +6.8 1670 −1.47 +1.39 −2.85 553(63rd)
2009 8-3 1526 24.1 21.3 +2.8 1400 −1.7 −0.8 −0.9 1478 −0.64 +0.82 −1.46 521(52nd)
2008 6-2 1436 40.0 29.8 +10.2 1226 +10.8 +10.9 −0.1 1496 −1.09 +0.58 −1.68 516(51st)
2007 4-6 1219 27.4 26.2 +1.2 1332 +2.0 +7.1 −5.2 1371 −4.61 +0.13 −4.74 482(37th)
2006 4-6 1312 25.9 30.8 −4.9 1345 +0.6 +10.7 −10.1 1247 −4.59 +0.25 −4.84 474(34th)
2005 3-7 1258 25.7 26.5 −0.8 1438 +1.5 +5.5 −4.0 1399 −4.93 +0.33 −5.26 490(40th)
2004 3-7 1029 14.3 24.7 −10.4 1370 −10.5 +5.5 −16.0 1099 −5.46 +0.17 −5.63 432(23rd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.