← Back

CLASS 6A · District 21-6A

Fort Bend Clements Rangers

Enrollment: 2,626 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6

Rank

#237

was #237

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

718

#237 of 249

OVR Grade

64.8

#237 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@Alvin (0-0) 976	25% (-10)	—	—	—	—
2	Houston Westside (0-0) 758	46% (-2)	—	—	—	—
3	Lamar Consolidated	8% (-23)	—	—	—	—
4	@Fort Bend Travis (0-0) 1526	3% (-32)	—	—	—	—
5	#19Fort Bend Ridge Point (0-0) 2225	< 2% (-60)	—	—	—	—
6	@Strake Jesuit (0-0) 1623	2% (-36)	—	—	—	—
7	@Fort Bend Hightower (0-0) 1756	< 2% (-41)	—	—	—	—
9	Fort Bend Austin (0-0) 901	32% (-7)	—	—	—	—
10	@Fort Bend Elkins (0-0) 1292	8% (-23)	—	—	—	—
11	Fort Bend Bush (0-0) 1433	5% (-29)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 21-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		19	Fort Bend Ridge Point (4) Panthers	87.5 2225	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.7-0.3	> 98%	D2
2		65	Fort Bend Hightower (8) Hurricanes	80.5 1756	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.1-1.9	94%	D2
3		88	Strake Jesuit (2) Crusaders	78.5 1623	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.4-2.5	82.5%	D1
4		105	Fort Bend Travis (1) Tigers	77 1526	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-3	67.2%	D1
5		138	Fort Bend Bush (7) Broncos	75.6 1433	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.5-3.5	41%	—
6		168	Fort Bend Elkins (3) Knights	73.5 1292	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.7-4.3	14.9%	—
7		221	Fort Bend Austin (5) Bulldogs	67.6 901	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.1-5.9	< 2%	—
8		237	Fort Bend Clements (6) Rangers	64.8 718	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.5-6.5	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Fort Bend Clements’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2007

13-1

Rating 611 (80th)

#2 · 2006

8-3

Rating 555 (64th)

#3 · 2009

7-3

Rating 519 (52nd)

#4 · 2005

7-4

Rating 502 (45th)

#5 · 2008

3-5

Rating 492 (41st)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	2-8	679	16.4	47.0	−30.6	1295	−19.5	+20.0	−39.5	512	−5.91	+0.02	−5.93	317(4th)
2024	1-9	580	12.3	52.3	−40.0	1238	−20.6	+29.8	−50.4	240	−7.06	+0.00	−7.07	273(1st)
2023	4-6	1289	23.0	33.8	−10.8	1418	−6.0	+8.4	−14.4	1139	−3.55	+0.19	−3.75	460(30th)
2022	5-6	1379	20.8	37.5	−16.6	1493	−5.4	+12.1	−17.6	1061	−3.01	+0.36	−3.38	450(28th)
2021	6-4	1394	26.5	25.2	+1.3	1368	−1.0	+3.5	−4.6	1386	−1.20	+0.62	−1.82	491(41st)
2020	4-6	1060	24.6	23.5	+1.1	1195	−8.7	+5.3	−14.0	1150	−4.70	+0.12	−4.81	425(21st)
2019	1-9	705	16.0	38.4	−22.4	1392	−13.2	+14.1	−27.3	818	−6.67	+0.00	−6.68	354(8th)
2018	2-7	684	21.1	35.2	−14.1	1368	−11.7	+9.1	−20.8	979	−4.75	+0.02	−4.77	375(10th)
2017	0-9	582	10.6	49.8	−39.2	1432	−19.0	+22.4	−41.4	466	−7.12	0.00	−7.12	298(3rd)
2016	1-9	666	13.1	43.4	−30.3	1387	−18.2	+15.9	−34.1	646	−7.22	+0.00	−7.23	329(5th)
2015	0-10	795	7.2	33.3	−26.1	1351	−21.0	+10.4	−31.4	714	−8.22	0.00	−8.22	349(7th)
2014	2-8	950	31.4	37.3	−5.9	1354	+1.5	+14.9	−13.3	1167	−6.71	+0.08	−6.79	424(21st)
2013	1-9	904	24.6	47.1	−22.5	1541	−4.4	+16.6	−21.0	975	−6.68	+0.20	−6.88	396(14th)
2012	1-9	935	12.7	29.5	−16.8	1561	−13.0	+1.6	−14.6	1136	−6.79	+0.38	−7.17	420(20th)
2011	1-9	1050	13.5	27.8	−14.3	1432	−11.7	+5.1	−16.7	1082	−7.15	+0.07	−7.22	425(21st)
2010	4-6	1196	26.5	31.7	−5.2	1340	−1.7	+9.0	−10.7	1233	−4.66	+0.32	−4.98	459(30th)
2009	7-3	1533	22.2	19.9	+2.3	1380	−3.3	−1.7	−1.6	1460	−0.77	+0.76	−1.53	519(52nd)
2008	3-5	1411	21.2	24.2	−3.0	1376	−6.0	+0.6	−6.6	1335	−3.66	+0.11	−3.77	492(41st)
2007	13-1	1938	32.9	20.2	+12.6	1440	+8.2	−2.2	+10.4	1760	+2.23	+2.32	−0.09	611(80th)
2006	8-3	1659	29.1	18.3	+10.8	1349	+2.3	−2.2	+4.5	1612	−1.16	+1.07	−2.23	555(64th)
2005	7-4	1458	19.9	20.5	−0.6	1361	−7.1	−1.0	−6.1	1348	−1.58	+0.97	−2.55	502(45th)
2004	5-5	1173	18.1	19.0	−0.9	1199	−11.6	+2.3	−13.9	1152	−3.85	+0.26	−4.12	452(28th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.