← Back

CLASS 6A · District 21-6A

Fort Bend Bush Broncos

Enrollment: 2,388 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 7

Rank

#138

was #138

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1433

#138 of 249

OVR Grade

75.6

#138 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Angleton	10% (-21)	—	—	—	—
2	#39Fulshear (0-0) 1944	11% (-20)	—	—	—	—
3	@Aldine Davis (0-0) 1416	52% (+1)	—	—	—	—
4	Fort Bend Austin (0-0) 901	90% (+21)	—	—	—	—
5	@Fort Bend Elkins (0-0) 1292	64% (+6)	—	—	—	—
6	Fort Bend Hightower (0-0) 1756	21% (-13)	—	—	—	—
7	Fort Bend Travis (0-0) 1526	40% (-4)	—	—	—	—
9	@#19Fort Bend Ridge Point (0-0) 2225	4% (-32)	—	—	—	—
10	Strake Jesuit (0-0) 1623	31% (-8)	—	—	—	—
11	@Fort Bend Clements (0-0) 718	95% (+29)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 21-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		19	Fort Bend Ridge Point (4) Panthers	87.5 2225	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.7-0.3	> 98%	D2
2		65	Fort Bend Hightower (8) Hurricanes	80.5 1756	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.1-1.9	94%	D2
3		88	Strake Jesuit (2) Crusaders	78.5 1623	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.4-2.5	82.5%	D1
4		105	Fort Bend Travis (1) Tigers	77 1526	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-3	67.2%	D1
5		138	Fort Bend Bush (7) Broncos	75.6 1433	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.5-3.5	41%	—
6		168	Fort Bend Elkins (3) Knights	73.5 1292	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.7-4.3	14.9%	—
7		221	Fort Bend Austin (5) Bulldogs	67.6 901	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.1-5.9	< 2%	—
8		237	Fort Bend Clements (6) Rangers	64.8 718	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.5-6.5	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Fort Bend Bush’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2013

9-3

Rating 617 (82nd)

#2 · 2012

10-2

Rating 611 (80th)

#3 · 2017

7-2

Rating 571 (69th)

#4 · 2011

8-4

Rating 553 (63rd)

#5 · 2016

6-5

Rating 528 (55th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	6-5	1183	32.7	37.7	−5.0	1307	−1.9	+10.4	−12.4	1191	−2.22	+0.24	−2.46	453(29th)
2024	2-8	856	11.8	38.2	−26.4	1314	−19.9	+14.3	−34.1	647	−5.65	+0.02	−5.67	352(7th)
2023	1-9	897	12.1	35.9	−23.8	1486	−16.3	+9.0	−25.4	866	−6.58	+0.02	−6.59	388(13th)
2022	2-8	1146	11.6	23.0	−11.4	1398	−17.2	−0.5	−16.7	1081	−6.17	+0.06	−6.23	433(23rd)
2021	5-6	1458	14.0	21.0	−7.0	1512	−10.8	−5.9	−4.9	1377	−2.61	+0.71	−3.33	496(43rd)
2020	1-6	1027	10.6	33.1	−22.6	1463	−15.9	+8.5	−24.3	892	−4.18	+0.03	−4.21	—
2019	5-6	1303	17.5	18.0	−0.5	1406	−10.8	−6.6	−4.2	1395	−3.09	+0.57	−3.66	488(39th)
2018	5-5	1383	24.9	24.7	+0.2	1421	−5.9	−2.6	−3.3	1419	−2.42	+0.99	−3.41	497(43rd)
2017	7-2	1634	34.8	16.2	+18.6	1330	+2.4	−7.6	+10.0	1751	−0.31	+0.74	−1.05	571(69th)
2016	6-5	1540	27.5	25.8	+1.6	1511	−1.8	−3.9	+2.0	1551	−2.20	+0.59	−2.79	528(55th)
2015	0-2	1580	10.5	33.5	−23.0	1781	−8.3	+1.5	−9.9	1253	−0.96	0.00	−0.96	—
2014	0-2	1666	5.0	28.5	−23.5	1885	−17.4	−4.9	−12.4	1189	−0.92	0.00	−0.92	—
2013	9-3	1819	42.5	24.0	+18.5	1482	+12.3	−5.0	+17.3	1932	−0.21	+1.22	−1.43	617(82nd)
2012	10-2	1839	28.0	14.7	+13.3	1468	+1.1	−10.7	+11.8	1794	+0.76	+1.80	−1.04	611(80th)
2011	8-4	1657	26.2	18.6	+7.7	1440	−0.1	−4.2	+4.1	1603	−1.36	+1.05	−2.41	553(63rd)
2010	6-4	1328	28.5	20.6	+7.9	1326	−1.0	−2.5	+1.5	1537	−2.36	+0.70	−3.06	512(49th)
2009	3-7	1043	22.0	25.0	−3.0	1341	−4.2	+4.7	−9.0	1276	−5.26	+0.12	−5.38	450(28th)
2008	3-5	1036	19.4	27.9	−8.5	1375	−8.6	+6.0	−14.6	1135	−3.49	+0.09	−3.57	432(23rd)
2007	2-8	1081	7.8	22.9	−15.1	1400	−16.2	+1.8	−18.0	1050	−5.76	+0.14	−5.90	426(21st)
2006	1-9	890	14.0	30.0	−16.0	1453	−9.7	+9.1	−18.8	1030	−7.50	+0.26	−7.76	407(16th)
2005	1-8	991	8.8	25.2	−16.4	1415	−15.1	+3.9	−19.0	1026	−6.60	+0.16	−6.77	416(19th)
2004	2-8	1024	10.0	23.4	−13.4	1315	−16.0	+4.4	−20.3	991	−6.72	+0.09	−6.81	417(19th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.