← Back
CLASS 6A · District 10-6A

Forney Jackrabbits

Enrollment: 2,933 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2
Rank
#61
was #61
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1808
#61 of 249
OVR Grade
81.2
#61 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1 63% (+5)
2
@McKinney (0-0) 1488
79% (+13)
3
@Dallas Jesuit (0-0) 1511
78% (+12)
4
Royse City (0-0) 1686
62% (+5)
5
@#44Rockwall-Heath (0-0) 1927
38% (-5)
7
Mesquite Horn (0-0) 1599
71% (+8)
8
@#8North Forney (0-0) 2478
6% (-27)
9
#46Rockwall (0-0) 1908
40% (-4)
10
@Tyler Legacy (0-0) 1473
80% (+13)
11
#14Longview (0-0) 2322
10% (-21)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 10-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 8
Falcons
91.4
2478
0-0 0-0 6.4-0.6 > 98% D2
2 14
Lobos
89
2322
0-0 0-0 5.8-1.2 > 98% D2
3 44
Hawks
83
1927
0-0 0-0 3.8-3.2 70.5% D1
4 46
Yellowjackets
82.8
1908
0-0 0-0 3.7-3.3 65% D1
5 61
Jackrabbits
81.2
1808
0-0 0-0 3.1-3.9 38.6%
6 77
Bulldogs
79.4
1686
0-0 0-0 2.3-4.7 16.7%
7 92
Jaguars
78.1
1599
0-0 0-0 1.8-5.2 8%
8 127
Red Raiders
76.2
1473
0-0 0-0 1.2-5.8 2.2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Forney’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2025
10-3
Rating 670 (90th)
#2 · 2024
5-6
Rating 602 (78th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 10-3 2144 39.6 30.7 +8.9 1824 +15.7 −7.6 +23.3 2084 +3.41 +4.14 −0.74 670(90th)
2024 5-6 1779 38.3 33.2 +5.1 1762 +12.9 −1.7 +14.7 1867 −1.59 +0.89 −2.48 602(78th)
2018 0-1 1297 17.0 22.0 −5.0 962 −19.2 +5.2 −24.4 890 −0.96 0.00 −0.96
2017 1-0 1407 17.0 13.0 +4.0 1082 −16.4 −6.4 −10.0 1250 +0.09 +0.09 0.00
2016 1-0 1355 42.0 10.0 +32.0 1273 +8.3 −11.6 +19.9 1997 +0.03 +0.03 0.00
2009 0-1 1230 14.0 24.0 −10.0 1358 −14.8 −0.8 −14.0 1150 −0.92 0.00 −0.92
2008 1-0 1321 52.0 42.0 +10.0 1121 +20.5 +17.2 +3.3 1583 +0.12 +0.12 0.00
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.