| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @Richardson Berkner (2-4) 1624 |
81% (+14) | W 28-17 | 2006 | +5.4 | −14.8 | +0.20 | — |
| 2 | 15% (-16) | L 10-35 | 1830 | −0.6 | −13.8 | — | −0.13 | |
| 3 | #45Aledo (3-3) 1975 |
33% (-7) | L 7-31 | 1565 | −4.6 | −7.2 | — | −0.33 |
| 5 | Irving (0-6) 436 |
> 98% (+53) | W 62-9 | 1556 | +5.9 | +3.6 | +0.00 | — |
| 6 | @South Grand Prairie (4-2) 1730 |
48% (-1) | W 24-17 | 1802 | +0.8 | −11.3 | +0.45 | — |
| 7 | Irving MacArthur (3-3) 1027 |
97% (+33) | W 52-7 | 2149 | +13.9 | −12.1 | +0.03 | — |
| 8 | @Irving Nimitz (1-5) 325 |
> 98% (+62) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | Grand Prairie (3-3) 962 |
98% (+36) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | @Fort Worth Haltom (3-3) 1404 |
87% (+19) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | Hurst Bell (3-3) 1286 |
92% (+23) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#58
was #59
Record
4-2
3-0 district
Elo
1869
#58 of 249
OVR Grade
82.2
#58 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
77.4
#98 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
82.9
#50 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1818
#73 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 8-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Euless Trinity’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2007
15-1
Rating 794 (99th)
#2 · 2010
15-1
Rating 783 (98th)
#3 · 2009
13-2
Rating 772 (98th)
#4 · 2006
11-1
Rating 755 (98th)
#5 · 2008
13-1
Rating 751 (97th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.