← Back

CLASS 6A · District 1-6A

El Paso Montwood Rams

Enrollment: 2,495 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6

Rank

#238

was #238

Record

0-7

0-3 district

Elo

569

#238 of 249

OVR Grade

62.5

#238 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

61.4

#231 of 249 in 6A

DEF Grade

56.5

#237 of 249 in 6A

Perf

474

#239 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	AOS	ADS	WQ	LQ
1	@El Paso Hanks	56% (+2)	L 27-63	-10	−13.2	+47.2	—	−0.99
2	@El Paso Del Valle	6% (-26)	L 14-56	76	−21.5	+35.5	—	−0.90
3	El Paso Americas	26% (-10)	L 21-35	577	−18.5	+18.5	—	−0.98
4	San Angelo Central (4-2) 1566	3% (-34)	L 7-42	664	−21.4	+12.0	—	−0.84
5	El Paso Pebble Hills (6-1) 1710	< 2% (-39)	L 7-44	776	−18.6	+10.3	—	−0.75
6	@El Paso Coronado (4-3) 1079	11% (-20)	L 24-27	891	−13.1	+11.2	—	−0.96
7	El Paso Franklin (3-3) 1129	10% (-21)	L 6-37	343	−28.8	+17.5	—	−0.96
8	@El Paso Socorro (2-3) 552	52% (+1)	—	—	—	—	—	—
10	El Paso Eastwood (5-2) 1614	< 2% (-42)	—	—	—	—	—	—
11	@El Paso Eastlake (4-2) 1323	4% (-30)	—	—	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 1-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		84	El Paso Pebble Hills (2) Spartans	79.8 1710	6-1	3-0	37.6	22.6	5.8-0.1	> 98%	D1
2		98	El Paso Eastwood (7) Troopers	78.3 1614	5-2	2-1	43.3	20.6	4.9-1.1	> 98%	D2
3		160	El Paso Eastlake (1) Falcons	73.9 1323	4-2	0-2	34.7	41.3	3.4-2.6	88%	D1
4		186	El Paso Franklin (4) Cougars	71 1129	3-3	2-0	30.7	23.2	3-3	68.8%	D2
5		196	El Paso Coronado (5) Thunderbirds	70.2 1079	4-3	2-1	26.1	26.0	2.8-3.2	43.2%	—
6		239	El Paso Socorro (3) Bulldogs	62.3 552	2-3	0-2	30.2	31.8	0.5-5.5	< 2%	—
7		238	El Paso Montwood (6) Rams	62.5 569	0-7	0-3	15.1	43.4	0.6-5.4	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how El Paso Montwood’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2012

8-3

Rating 573 (70th)

#2 · 2007

10-2

Rating 561 (66th)

#3 · 2004

9-2

Rating 559 (65th)

#4 · 2009

8-4

Rating 552 (63rd)

#5 · 2011

8-3

Rating 539 (58th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	1-9	683	33.8	58.5	−24.7	1226	−1.8	+33.4	−35.3	618	−7.84	+0.00	−7.85	332(5th)
2024	3-7	1004	24.3	42.4	−18.1	1217	−12.2	+16.0	−28.1	797	−5.74	+0.12	−5.87	385(12th)
2023	5-6	991	31.2	32.7	−1.5	1127	−6.7	+9.1	−15.8	1105	−4.59	+0.15	−4.74	429(22nd)
2022	2-8	761	36.1	42.2	−6.1	1239	0.0	+16.6	−16.6	1085	−7.06	+0.24	−7.31	398(15th)
2021	3-7	1184	27.6	29.8	−2.2	1272	−6.0	+5.7	−11.7	1206	−5.54	+0.08	−5.62	448(27th)
2020	4-3	1463	36.0	33.3	+2.7	1329	+3.5	+7.4	−3.9	1402	−1.60	+0.34	−1.93	—
2019	7-4	1599	39.0	37.6	+1.4	1393	+7.3	+8.3	−1.0	1476	−1.19	+0.87	−2.05	523(53rd)
2018	4-6	1257	24.2	28.7	−4.5	1366	−6.5	+1.0	−7.4	1314	−3.97	+0.77	−4.74	471(34th)
2017	10-2	1592	48.4	36.4	+12.0	1300	+12.3	+9.5	+2.8	1569	+0.10	+1.32	−1.22	536(57th)
2016	7-4	1488	33.2	32.9	+0.3	1342	−2.3	+4.5	−6.8	1331	−2.01	+0.73	−2.74	494(42nd)
2015	6-4	1413	22.6	20.5	+2.1	1474	−8.7	−7.1	−1.5	1461	−1.93	+0.70	−2.63	505(46th)
2014	1-8	1159	16.0	33.9	−17.9	1453	−14.4	+2.1	−16.6	1086	−6.06	+0.02	−6.08	433(23rd)
2013	7-4	1602	27.9	24.6	+3.3	1373	−5.1	−3.6	−1.4	1464	−1.41	+0.88	−2.29	524(53rd)
2012	8-3	1739	36.3	23.5	+12.8	1411	+6.9	−2.3	+9.2	1731	−0.22	+1.04	−1.26	573(70th)
2011	8-3	1634	39.3	28.0	+11.3	1243	+6.4	+5.0	+1.3	1533	−1.07	+0.67	−1.74	539(58th)
2010	7-3	1429	27.9	22.5	+5.4	1229	−5.2	+0.2	−5.4	1366	−1.60	+0.91	−2.51	499(44th)
2009	8-4	1574	28.6	22.2	+6.4	1340	+0.5	−3.3	+3.8	1594	−1.65	+1.29	−2.94	552(63rd)
2008	8-4	1483	26.8	18.3	+8.5	1271	−3.9	−4.4	+0.5	1512	−2.36	+1.02	−3.37	536(57th)
2007	10-2	1678	35.4	19.5	+15.9	1265	+6.6	+0.2	+6.3	1658	−0.33	+0.74	−1.06	561(66th)
2006	8-3	1477	34.7	20.1	+14.6	1158	+6.0	+4.5	+1.5	1538	−2.10	+0.44	−2.54	527(54th)
2005	4-5	1055	22.2	26.1	−3.9	1203	−8.7	+7.0	−15.7	1108	−4.38	+0.17	−4.54	434(23rd)
2004	9-2	1578	33.0	17.4	+15.6	1153	+2.0	−0.9	+2.9	1573	−0.43	+0.60	−1.03	559(65th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.