← Back
CLASS 6A · District 1-6A

El Paso Franklin Cougars

Enrollment: 2,590 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4
Rank
#186
was #193
Record
3-3
2-0 district
Elo
1129
#186 of 249
OVR Grade
71
#186 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
67.7
#199 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
70.1
#173 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1094
#189 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
El Paso Chapin
89% (+20) L 14-39 511 −21.3 +18.3 — −0.98
2
@Midland Lee (4-3) 1669
7% (-24) L 17-48 771 −13.9 +15.2 — −0.60
3
@El Paso Andress
67% (+7) L 17-20 955 −20.4 +1.4 — −0.98
4
El Paso Parkland
84% (+16) W 62-13 1839 +16.3 +2.7 +0.01 —
6
El Paso Socorro (2-3) 552
90% (+21) W 37-13 1202 −11.4 +0.6 +0.00 —
7
@El Paso Montwood (0-7) 569
90% (+21) W 37-6 1286 −11.8 −3.3 +0.01 —
8
El Paso Eastwood (5-2) 1614
12% (-19) — — — — — —
9
@El Paso Eastlake (4-2) 1323
31% (-8) — — — — — —
10 8% (-23) — — — — — —
11
@El Paso Coronado (4-3) 1079
55% (+2) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 1-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 84
Spartans
79.8
1710
6-1 3-0 37.6 22.6 5.8-0.1 > 98% D1
2 98
Troopers
78.3
1614
5-2 2-1 43.3 20.6 4.9-1.1 > 98% D2
3 160
Falcons
73.9
1323
4-2 0-2 34.7 41.3 3.4-2.6 88% D1
4 186
Cougars
71
1129
3-3 2-0 30.7 23.2 3-3 68.8% D2
5 196
Thunderbirds
70.2
1079
4-3 2-1 26.1 26.0 2.8-3.2 43.2% —
6 239
Bulldogs
62.3
552
2-3 0-2 30.2 31.8 0.5-5.5 < 2% —
7 238
Rams
62.5
569
0-7 0-3 15.1 43.4 0.6-5.4 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how El Paso Franklin’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2012
10-2
Rating 614 (81st)
#2 · 2014
9-2
Rating 605 (79th)
#3 · 2018
9-3
Rating 589 (75th)
#4 · 2005
11-2
Rating 579 (71st)
#5 · 2004
10-2
Rating 565 (67th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 8-3 1486 50.4 32.1 +18.3 1127 +11.1 +9.0 +2.2 1554 −1.81 +0.43 −2.24 530(55th)
2024 6-5 1322 31.6 27.5 +4.1 1160 −5.8 +3.7 −9.5 1263 −3.82 +0.31 −4.13 476(35th)
2023 6-4 1116 32.5 26.8 +5.7 992 −7.1 +9.8 −16.9 1077 −3.30 +0.20 −3.50 436(24th)
2022 6-5 1381 38.8 28.6 +10.2 1186 +3.6 +1.7 +1.9 1547 −3.72 +0.31 −4.03 515(50th)
2021 8-3 1700 39.1 28.3 +10.8 1345 +7.7 +3.3 +4.3 1609 −1.20 +0.94 −2.13 548(62nd)
2020 2-3 1655 30.6 26.6 +4.0 1527 +0.8 −3.3 +4.1 1604 −1.43 +0.56 −1.99 —
2019 8-3 1599 37.2 19.8 +17.4 1345 +3.1 −5.5 +8.6 1715 −0.98 +0.98 −1.97 555(63rd)
2018 9-3 1754 44.1 29.7 +14.4 1380 +14.4 +1.3 +13.1 1828 −0.38 +0.97 −1.36 589(75th)
2017 4-6 1235 35.4 37.9 −2.5 1397 +1.4 +8.3 −6.9 1327 −4.09 +0.62 −4.71 471(34th)
2016 4-7 1257 31.1 46.7 −15.6 1465 −0.7 +15.1 −15.7 1106 −4.06 +0.28 −4.35 444(26th)
2015 4-6 1320 32.8 37.1 −4.3 1443 −0.6 +5.6 −6.2 1344 −4.33 +0.32 −4.65 480(37th)
2014 9-2 1865 42.5 25.7 +16.7 1405 +9.9 −6.0 +15.9 1898 +0.33 +1.94 −1.60 605(79th)
2013 6-5 1435 44.4 37.3 +7.1 1291 +10.4 +11.9 −1.5 1462 −3.49 +0.65 −4.15 509(48th)
2012 10-2 1789 39.5 16.7 +22.8 1321 +8.1 −7.7 +15.8 1895 +0.33 +1.19 −0.85 614(81st)
2011 9-2 1651 39.4 22.1 +17.3 1227 +5.3 +0.1 +5.2 1630 −0.54 +0.65 −1.19 565(67th)
2010 7-3 1362 29.1 22.8 +6.3 1217 −5.3 +1.1 −6.4 1340 −1.86 +0.79 −2.64 489(40th)
2009 6-5 1361 31.1 26.0 +5.1 1218 −0.6 +5.2 −5.7 1357 −3.35 +0.42 −3.77 490(40th)
2008 7-4 1342 32.3 25.4 +6.9 1186 −1.2 +4.6 −5.8 1355 −2.43 +0.22 −2.65 489(40th)
2007 8-3 1398 26.0 15.1 +10.9 1163 −6.8 −3.3 −3.6 1411 −2.02 +0.30 −2.32 513(49th)
2006 5-5 1360 16.8 14.5 +2.3 1128 −15.9 −3.4 −12.5 1188 −4.36 +0.38 −4.73 481(37th)
2005 11-2 1734 33.7 18.8 +14.8 1320 +4.6 −1.7 +6.3 1656 +0.22 +1.26 −1.04 579(71st)
2004 10-2 1488 36.0 12.0 +24.0 1181 +2.4 −3.9 +6.3 1658 −0.89 +0.57 −1.46 565(67th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.