| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | El Paso Del Valle |
21% (-13) | W 41-27 | 1476 | +5.5 | +6.5 | +0.19 | — |
| 2 | @El Paso El Dorado |
66% (+6) | W 48-43 | 1284 | +13.2 | +21.8 | +0.06 | — |
| 3 | Midland Lee (4-3) 1669 |
18% (-15) | W 51-48 | 1621 | +20.1 | +15.2 | +0.41 | — |
| 4 | @El Paso Bel Air |
> 98% (+49) | W 61-43 | 709 | +8.2 | +39.8 | +0.00 | — |
| 5 | @El Paso Eastwood (5-2) 1614 |
45% (-2) | L 0-42 | 819 | −24.1 | +3.1 | — | −0.78 |
| 7 | El Paso Pebble Hills (6-1) 1710 |
24% (-11) | L 7-45 | 751 | −18.6 | +11.3 | — | −0.69 |
| 8 | @El Paso Coronado (4-3) 1079 |
74% (+10) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | El Paso Franklin (3-3) 1129 |
69% (+8) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | @El Paso Socorro (2-3) 552 |
96% (+31) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | El Paso Montwood (0-7) 569 |
96% (+30) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#160
was #152
Record
4-2
0-2 district
Elo
1323
#160 of 249
OVR Grade
73.9
#160 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
75.5
#118 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
61.1
#222 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1110
#184 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 1-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how El Paso Eastlake’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2021
10-2
Rating 537 (58th)
#2 · 2024
7-4
Rating 503 (45th)
#3 · 2022
6-5
Rating 459 (30th)
#4 · 2025
5-6
Rating 444 (26th)
#5 · 2023
5-5
Rating 391 (13th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.