| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | El Paso El Dorado |
23% (-12) | L 21-28 | 984 | −13.8 | +6.8 | — | −0.95 |
| 2 | @Odessa (2-5) 906 |
46% (-2) | L 11-19 | 893 | −21.5 | +2.7 | — | −0.98 |
| 3 | El Paso Burges |
58% (+3) | W 44-17 | 1285 | −1.8 | +6.8 | +0.01 | — |
| 4 | @El Paso Del Valle |
13% (-18) | W 28-14 | 1476 | −7.5 | −6.5 | +0.10 | — |
| 5 | @El Paso Socorro (2-3) 552 |
89% (+20) | W 38-35 | 677 | −10.4 | +22.6 | +0.00 | — |
| 6 | El Paso Montwood (0-7) 569 |
89% (+20) | W 27-24 | 586 | −21.8 | +14.7 | +0.01 | — |
| 7 | @El Paso Eastwood (5-2) 1614 |
11% (-20) | L 14-45 | 1094 | −10.1 | +6.1 | — | −0.75 |
| 8 | El Paso Eastlake (4-2) 1323 |
26% (-10) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | @El Paso Pebble Hills (6-1) 1710 |
7% (-25) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | El Paso Franklin (3-3) 1129 |
45% (-2) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#196
was #195
Record
4-3
2-1 district
Elo
1079
#196 of 249
OVR Grade
70.2
#196 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
66.3
#210 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
68.5
#181 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1000
#200 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 1-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance


Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how El Paso Coronado’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2009
11-1
Rating 605 (79th)
#2 · 2010
8-4
Rating 573 (70th)
#3 · 2013
7-3
Rating 525 (54th)
#4 · 2018
7-4
Rating 515 (50th)
#5 · 2006
9-2
Rating 505 (46th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.





