← Back
CLASS 6A · District 31-6A

Edinburg Vela Sabercats

Enrollment: 2,177 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5
Rank
#109
was #109
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1516
#109 of 249
OVR Grade
76.9
#109 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@Corpus Christi Veterans
32% (-7)
2
San Benito (0-0) 1261
74% (+10)
3
PSJA North (0-0) 1658
36% (-6)
4
Edcouch-Elsa
95% (+29)
5
@Los Fresnos (0-0) 1479
54% (+1)
7
Weslaco (0-0) 1499
52% (+1)
8
@La Joya (0-0) 933
92% (+23)
9 78% (+12)
10
@Edinburg (0-0) 1029
89% (+20)
11
Edinburg North (0-0) 663
97% (+34)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 31-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 109
Sabercats
76.9
1516
0-0 0-0 4.1-0.9 > 98% D2
2 115
Panthers
76.6
1499
0-0 0-0 4-1 > 98% D1
3 178
Jaguars
72.4
1220
0-0 0-0 2.8-2.2 90.8% D1
4 203
Bobcats
69.5
1029
0-0 0-0 2-3 68.4% D2
5 216
Coyotes
68
933
0-0 0-0 1.6-3.5 36%
6 240
Cougars
64
663
0-0 0-0 0.6-4.4 6.2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Edinburg Vela’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2018
12-1
Rating 680 (92nd)
#2 · 2021
12-1
Rating 658 (89th)
#3 · 2019
9-4
Rating 592 (76th)
#4 · 2017
12-1
Rating 588 (74th)
#5 · 2016
9-2
Rating 547 (61st)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 2-1 1474 32.0 10.3 +21.7 1011 −3.6 −6.0 +2.3 1558 −0.91 +0.06 −0.97
2024 3-0 1804 35.7 13.0 +22.7 862 +1.5 +2.2 −0.7 1483 +0.26 +0.26 0.00
2023 2-0 1832 53.5 19.0 +34.5 910 +11.7 +2.6 +9.1 1727 +0.04 +0.04 0.00
2022 2-0 1897 52.5 13.5 +39.0 1193 +21.3 −2.8 +24.1 2103 +0.13 +0.13 0.00
2021 12-1 2052 36.6 10.1 +26.5 1356 +8.2 −12.9 +21.1 2028 +1.89 +1.98 −0.09 658(89th)
2020 6-1 1856 34.1 15.9 +18.3 1335 +5.4 −8.3 +13.7 1843 +0.60 +0.94 −0.33
2019 9-4 1827 38.4 22.4 +16.0 1405 +8.4 −1.9 +10.3 1758 −0.38 +1.74 −2.12 592(76th)
2018 12-1 2107 38.2 11.5 +26.7 1456 +11.8 −11.6 +23.4 2086 +2.20 +2.23 −0.03 680(92nd)
2017 12-1 1860 42.8 19.3 +23.5 1226 +11.2 −0.2 +11.4 1784 +0.97 +1.01 −0.03 588(74th)
2016 9-2 1620 43.4 23.2 +20.2 1129 +11.0 +5.7 +5.3 1634 −1.24 +0.47 −1.71 547(61st)
2015 3-0 1556 54.0 20.3 +33.7 862 +18.3 +7.5 +10.8 1769 +0.11 +0.11 0.00
2014 3-0 1465 47.7 14.7 +33.0 963 +15.5 +1.5 +14.0 1849 +0.32 +0.32 0.00
2013 5-5 1146 29.1 21.5 +7.6 1155 −1.2 +5.8 −7.0 1326 −3.71 +0.17 −3.88 465(32nd)
2012 0-10 508 6.0 43.5 −37.5 1151 −26.4 +24.0 −50.4 239 −9.05 0.00 −9.05 263(1st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.