← Back

CLASS 6A · District 31-6A

Edinburg North Cougars

Enrollment: 2,477 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 3

Rank

#244

was #244

Record

0-6

0-1 district

Elo

447

#244 of 249

OVR Grade

60.7

#244 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

57.7

#244 of 249 in 6A

DEF Grade

51.7

#245 of 249 in 6A

Perf

203

#244 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	AOS	ADS	WQ	LQ
1	Sharyland Pioneer	36% (-5)	L 13-35	259	−28.8	+20.8	—	−0.99
2	@McAllen	3% (-33)	L 0-60	-59	−29.2	+33.2	—	−0.87
3	Brownsville Hanna	41% (-4)	L 21-52	-10	−21.7	+38.7	—	−0.99
4	@Mercedes	3% (-34)	L 6-49	257	−25.4	+24.4	—	−0.90
5	Alice	10% (-21)	L 13-55	-28	−24.6	+36.6	—	−0.97
7	@La Joya (3-3) 963	11% (-20)	L 28-34	799	−17.6	+10.4	—	−0.98
8	Edinburg (4-2) 874	14% (-17)	—	—	—	—	—	—
9	@Weslaco (3-3) 1417	< 2% (-39)	—	—	—	—	—	—
10	Edinburg Economedes (2-4) 1062	7% (-25)	—	—	—	—	—	—
11	@Edinburg Vela (5-1) 1690	< 2% (-50)	—	—	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 31-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		87	Edinburg Vela (5) Sabercats	79.5 1690	5-1	1-0	36.8	27.3	4.8-0.1	> 98%	D2
2		142	Weslaco (1) Panthers	75.3 1417	3-3	0-1	32.8	22.2	3.6-1.4	> 98%	D1
3		199	Edinburg Economedes (2) Jaguars	70 1062	2-4	1-0	23.2	33.3	2.8-2.2	97.2%	D1
4		208	La Joya (4) Coyotes	68.5 963	3-3	1-0	36.8	35.7	2.2-2.8	76.7%	D2
5		216	Edinburg (6) Bobcats	67.2 874	4-2	0-1	27.2	19.8	1.4-3.6	26.5%	—
6		244	Edinburg North (3) Cougars	60.7 447	0-6	0-1	13.5	47.5	0.2-4.8	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Edinburg North’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2013

11-2

Rating 589 (75th)

#2 · 2009

9-4

Rating 520 (52nd)

#3 · 2012

10-3

Rating 508 (48th)

#4 · 2008

7-4

Rating 488 (40th)

#5 · 2021

5-5

Rating 467 (32nd)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	1-9	462	23.2	36.4	−13.2	1016	−15.1	+18.3	−33.4	664	−8.31	+0.00	−8.31	318(4th)
2024	3-7	561	16.3	26.2	−9.9	966	−20.2	+10.0	−30.2	746	−6.18	+0.03	−6.21	339(6th)
2023	5-6	863	28.2	33.5	−5.3	971	−9.3	+16.3	−25.6	859	−4.84	+0.03	−4.87	384(12th)
2022	8-3	1318	24.4	18.5	+5.9	1019	−11.6	+1.6	−13.2	1171	−1.80	+0.23	−2.03	460(31st)
2021	5-5	1252	26.0	19.9	+6.1	1161	−7.1	+1.0	−8.2	1296	−3.53	+0.17	−3.70	467(32nd)
2020	2-5	964	19.0	25.4	−6.4	1330	−11.2	+4.0	−15.2	1120	−3.62	+0.16	−3.78	—
2019	3-8	965	17.4	34.2	−16.8	1253	−14.3	+12.7	−27.0	826	−6.15	+0.04	−6.19	379(11th)
2018	2-8	961	12.8	33.7	−20.9	1240	−17.0	+14.5	−31.4	715	−6.38	+0.03	−6.41	365(9th)
2017	5-5	1206	19.1	25.2	−6.1	1148	−13.8	+6.5	−20.3	992	−3.59	+0.17	−3.77	423(20th)
2016	4-7	1111	23.6	22.5	+1.2	1168	−8.2	+3.8	−12.0	1199	−5.85	+0.14	−5.99	443(26th)
2015	3-7	974	23.1	31.5	−8.4	1216	−10.2	+9.5	−19.7	1007	−5.71	+0.17	−5.88	404(16th)
2014	5-6	952	17.9	31.1	−13.2	1309	−12.9	+8.6	−21.5	963	−5.04	+0.47	−5.51	398(14th)
2013	11-2	1766	30.2	11.9	+18.2	1201	−0.5	−6.7	+6.1	1653	+0.32	+0.81	−0.49	589(75th)
2012	10-3	1422	22.2	15.4	+6.8	1132	−9.9	−3.0	−6.9	1327	−1.04	+0.40	−1.44	508(48th)
2011	3-7	984	25.1	32.1	−7.0	1227	−6.5	+10.0	−16.5	1088	−5.50	+0.09	−5.59	420(20th)
2010	1-9	923	21.1	37.4	−16.3	1260	−11.0	+14.5	−25.5	863	−7.45	+0.02	−7.47	386(12th)
2009	9-4	1533	31.5	26.8	+4.7	1249	−1.1	+3.5	−4.5	1387	−1.96	+0.68	−2.64	520(52nd)
2008	7-4	1351	34.7	26.5	+8.2	1169	+2.1	+8.2	−6.1	1347	−2.92	+0.29	−3.22	488(40th)
2007	7-4	1173	25.6	20.5	+5.1	1113	−6.3	+3.6	−9.9	1252	−3.07	+0.40	−3.47	462(31st)
2006	2-8	831	14.0	20.4	−6.4	1061	−18.0	+6.2	−24.1	897	−7.47	+0.06	−7.53	384(12th)
2005	3-6	667	10.8	19.8	−9.0	1086	−20.2	+5.0	−25.2	870	−5.47	+0.06	−5.53	367(9th)
2004	1-8	595	14.2	33.4	−19.2	1015	−22.3	+15.9	−38.2	545	−7.65	+0.01	−7.66	319(4th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.