← Back
CLASS 6A · District 31-6A

Edinburg North Cougars

Enrollment: 2,477 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 3
Rank
#240
was #240
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
663
#240 of 249
OVR Grade
64
#240 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
—
DEF Grade
—
Perf
—

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
Sharyland Pioneer
 36% (-5) — — — —
2
@McAllen
 6% (-25) — — — —
3
Brownsville Hanna
 46% (-1) — — — —
4
@Mercedes
 6% (-25) — — — —
5
Alice
 20% (-13) — — — —
7
@La Joya (0-0) 933
 24% (-11) — — — —
8
Edinburg (0-0) 1029
 18% (-15) — — — —
9
@Weslaco (0-0) 1499
 3% (-33) — — — —
10
Edinburg Economedes (0-0) 1220
 9% (-22) — — — —
11
@Edinburg Vela (0-0) 1516
 3% (-34) — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 31-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 109
Sabercats
76.9
1516
0-0 0-0 — — 4.1-0.9 > 98% D2
2 115
Panthers
76.6
1499
0-0 0-0 — — 4-1 > 98% D1
3 178
Jaguars
72.4
1220
0-0 0-0 — — 2.8-2.2 90.8% D1
4 203
Bobcats
69.5
1029
0-0 0-0 — — 2-3 68.4% D2
5 216
Coyotes
68
933
0-0 0-0 — — 1.6-3.5 36% —
6 240
Cougars
64
663
0-0 0-0 — — 0.6-4.4 6.2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Edinburg North’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2013
11-2
Rating 589 (75th)
#2 · 2009
9-4
Rating 520 (52nd)
#3 · 2012
10-3
Rating 508 (48th)
#4 · 2008
7-4
Rating 488 (40th)
#5 · 2021
5-5
Rating 467 (32nd)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 1-9 462 23.2 36.4 −13.2 1016 −15.1 +18.3 −33.4 664 −8.31 +0.00 −8.31 318(4th)
2024 3-7 561 16.3 26.2 −9.9 966 −20.2 +10.0 −30.2 746 −6.18 +0.03 −6.21 339(6th)
2023 5-6 863 28.2 33.5 −5.3 971 −9.3 +16.3 −25.6 859 −4.84 +0.03 −4.87 384(12th)
2022 8-3 1318 24.4 18.5 +5.9 1019 −11.6 +1.6 −13.2 1171 −1.80 +0.23 −2.03 460(31st)
2021 5-5 1252 26.0 19.9 +6.1 1161 −7.1 +1.0 −8.2 1296 −3.53 +0.17 −3.70 467(32nd)
2020 2-5 964 19.0 25.4 −6.4 1330 −11.2 +4.0 −15.2 1120 −3.62 +0.16 −3.78 —
2019 3-8 965 17.4 34.2 −16.8 1253 −14.3 +12.7 −27.0 826 −6.15 +0.04 −6.19 379(11th)
2018 2-8 961 12.8 33.7 −20.9 1240 −17.0 +14.5 −31.4 715 −6.38 +0.03 −6.41 365(9th)
2017 5-5 1206 19.1 25.2 −6.1 1148 −13.8 +6.5 −20.3 992 −3.59 +0.17 −3.77 423(20th)
2016 4-7 1111 23.6 22.5 +1.2 1168 −8.2 +3.8 −12.0 1199 −5.85 +0.14 −5.99 443(26th)
2015 3-7 974 23.1 31.5 −8.4 1216 −10.2 +9.5 −19.7 1007 −5.71 +0.17 −5.88 404(16th)
2014 5-6 952 17.9 31.1 −13.2 1309 −12.9 +8.6 −21.5 963 −5.04 +0.47 −5.51 398(14th)
2013 11-2 1766 30.2 11.9 +18.2 1201 −0.5 −6.7 +6.1 1653 +0.32 +0.81 −0.49 589(75th)
2012 10-3 1422 22.2 15.4 +6.8 1132 −9.9 −3.0 −6.9 1327 −1.04 +0.40 −1.44 508(48th)
2011 3-7 984 25.1 32.1 −7.0 1227 −6.5 +10.0 −16.5 1088 −5.50 +0.09 −5.59 420(20th)
2010 1-9 923 21.1 37.4 −16.3 1260 −11.0 +14.5 −25.5 863 −7.45 +0.02 −7.47 386(12th)
2009 9-4 1533 31.5 26.8 +4.7 1249 −1.1 +3.5 −4.5 1387 −1.96 +0.68 −2.64 520(52nd)
2008 7-4 1351 34.7 26.5 +8.2 1169 +2.1 +8.2 −6.1 1347 −2.92 +0.29 −3.22 488(40th)
2007 7-4 1173 25.6 20.5 +5.1 1113 −6.3 +3.6 −9.9 1252 −3.07 +0.40 −3.47 462(31st)
2006 2-8 831 14.0 20.4 −6.4 1061 −18.0 +6.2 −24.1 897 −7.47 +0.06 −7.53 384(12th)
2005 3-6 667 10.8 19.8 −9.0 1086 −20.2 +5.0 −25.2 870 −5.47 +0.06 −5.53 367(9th)
2004 1-8 595 14.2 33.4 −19.2 1015 −22.3 +15.9 −38.2 545 −7.65 +0.01 −7.66 319(4th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.