| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 69% (+8) | L 7-26 | 2538 | +5.2 | −36.3 | — | −0.06 | |
| 2 | Cedar Hill |
98% (+36) | W 34-7 | 2309 | +8.7 | −23.7 | +0.29 | — |
| 3 | DeSoto |
53% (+1) | L 20-21 | 2526 | +13.0 | −28.0 | — | −0.06 |
| 4 | #1North Crowley (6-0) 2885 |
29% (-9) | L 30-47 | 2384 | +29.1 | −6.2 | — | −0.02 |
| 5 | @Red Oak (4-2) 1711 |
96% (+31) | W 42-0 | 2680 | +17.7 | −29.5 | +0.36 | — |
| 7 | Mansfield (2-4) 1536 |
> 98% (+38) | W 45-7 | 2636 | +16.6 | −28.8 | +0.21 | — |
| 8 | Crowley (2-4) 1433 |
> 98% (+42) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | 37% (-5) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 10 | Mansfield Lake Ridge (4-2) 1880 |
93% (+24) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | @Dallas Skyline (1-5) 1070 |
> 98% (+57) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#7
was #7
Record
3-3
2-1 district
Elo
2485
#7 of 249
OVR Grade
91.5
#7 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
85.6
#33 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
96.7
#4 of 249 in 6A
Perf
2512
#10 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 11-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Duncanville’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2022
15-0
Rating 951 (100th)
#2 · 2023
14-1
Rating 916 (100th)
#3 · 2021
13-2
Rating 891 (100th)
#4 · 2024
13-1
Rating 856 (99th)
#5 · 2025
12-2
Rating 855 (99th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.