← Back
CLASS 6A · District 26-6A

Dripping Springs Tigers

Enrollment: 2,622 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4
Rank
#26
was #26
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
2147
#26 of 249
OVR Grade
86.4
#26 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
2
#35San Antonio Harlan (0-0) 1967
68% (+7)
3
@Round Rock (0-0) 1849
78% (+12)
4 68% (+7)
5
@Austin Akins (0-0) 892
> 98% (+50)
6
Buda Johnson (0-0) 1331
97% (+33)
7
@Austin High (0-0) 1099
> 98% (+42)
8
Austin Bowie (0-0) 1700
87% (+18)
9 91% (+22)
11 > 98% (+50)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 26-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 26
Tigers
86.4
2147
0-0 0-0 5.7-0.3 > 98% D2
2 74
Bulldogs
79.6
1700
0-0 0-0 4.4-1.6 > 98% D1
3 95
Hawks
78
1593
0-0 0-0 4-2 96.8% D2
4 159
Jaguars
74.1
1331
0-0 0-0 2.9-3.1 75.8% D1
5 196
Maroons
70.6
1099
0-0 0-0 1.9-4.1 20.2%
6 220
Cardinals
67.6
904
0-0 0-0 1-5 4.7%
7 222
Eagles
67.4
892
0-0 0-0 1-5 4%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Dripping Springs’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2022
12-2
Rating 770 (98th)
#2 · 2025
12-2
Rating 725 (96th)
#3 · 2023
11-3
Rating 688 (93rd)
#4 · 2024
8-4
Rating 620 (82nd)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 12-2 2272 42.6 14.8 +27.8 1694 +18.3 −15.9 +34.2 2356 +4.36 +4.58 −0.21 725(96th)
2024 8-4 1796 37.2 26.8 +10.4 1717 +11.5 −6.3 +17.8 1944 +0.54 +1.55 −1.01 620(82nd)
2023 11-3 2190 38.4 15.6 +22.8 1560 +13.5 −11.9 +25.4 2135 +2.03 +2.25 −0.23 688(93rd)
2022 12-2 2316 46.5 12.6 +33.9 1741 +22.8 −19.7 +42.5 2561 +4.38 +4.48 −0.10 770(98th)
2021 1-0 1851 70.0 42.0 +28.0 1483 +29.1 +4.1 +24.9 2123 +0.80 +0.80 0.00
2020 0-1 1541 28.0 45.0 −17.0 2208 +4.2 +5.1 −0.9 1477 −0.66 0.00 −0.66
2019 1-1 1634 37.5 30.0 +7.5 1470 +5.2 −0.9 +6.1 1653 −0.47 +0.07 −0.54
2018 1-1 1622 38.0 38.0 0.0 1647 +7.6 +3.9 +3.6 1591 −0.58 +0.14 −0.72
2017 2-0 1641 34.0 19.0 +15.0 1374 +3.5 −13.2 +16.8 1919 +0.22 +0.22 0.00
2016 2-0 1561 39.0 16.5 +22.5 1285 +8.4 −9.9 +18.3 1958 +0.36 +0.36 0.00
2015 1-1 1287 27.5 12.0 +15.5 1286 −5.4 −11.1 +5.7 1643 −0.80 +0.05 −0.85
2014 1-1 1201 30.5 34.5 −4.0 1272 −7.1 +10.8 −18.0 1051 −0.93 +0.04 −0.96
2013 0-1 1326 22.0 35.0 −13.0 1374 −8.6 +8.9 −17.5 1062 −0.97 0.00 −0.97
2012 1-0 1555 31.0 14.0 +17.0 968 −3.1 −4.8 +1.6 1541 +0.02 +0.02 0.00
2007 1-0 1556 24.0 14.0 +10.0 927 −12.2 −0.8 −11.3 1216 +0.05 +0.05 0.00
2006 1-0 1532 25.0 23.0 +2.0 980 −11.0 +3.0 −14.0 1151 +0.15 +0.15 0.00
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.