| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | #10Fort Bend Ridge Point (7-0) 2445 |
65% (+6) | L 26-29 | 2312 | +16.3 | −16.2 | — | −0.17 |
| 2 | #5Katy (7-0) 2587 |
30% (-8) | L 24-42 | 2122 | +16.6 | −8.2 | — | −0.06 |
| 3 | #16Humble Atascocita (4-3) 2319 |
34% (-6) | L 7-21 | 1964 | −2.0 | −20.6 | — | −0.09 |
| 4 | @Clear Lake (2-4) 1116 |
> 98% (+42) | W 72-0 | 2698 | +28.6 | −19.4 | +0.05 | — |
| 5 | Clear Springs (2-4) 1518 |
94% (+26) | W 59-7 | 2637 | +31.1 | −14.3 | +0.22 | — |
| 6 | @Clear Creek (1-5) 1150 |
> 98% (+42) | W 49-6 | 2241 | +15.3 | −14.3 | +0.05 | — |
| 8 | 70% (+8) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 9 | #30Deer Park (6-0) 2095 |
62% (+5) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | @Clear Falls (3-3) 1637 |
92% (+23) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | Clear Brook (1-5) 686 |
> 98% (+61) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#22
was #20
Record
3-3
3-0 district
Elo
2210
#22 of 249
OVR Grade
87.3
#22 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
87.4
#21 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
88.2
#24 of 249 in 6A
Perf
2329
#22 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 18-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Dickinson’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2025
13-1
Rating 744 (97th)
#2 · 2016
10-2
Rating 710 (95th)
#3 · 2021
9-3
Rating 705 (94th)
#4 · 2023
9-2
Rating 705 (94th)
#5 · 2019
10-2
Rating 696 (94th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.