| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Crandall |
48% (-1) | W 35-24 | 1486 | +1.2 | +1.8 | +0.12 | — |
| 2 | @Dallas Skyline (1-5) 1070 |
57% (+3) | W 45-10 | 1918 | +5.9 | −10.9 | +0.13 | — |
| 3 | @Plano West (2-4) 1342 |
60% (+4) | W 13-10 | 1496 | −12.2 | −12.0 | +0.17 | — |
| 5 | @Flower Mound (5-1) 1720 |
39% (-4) | W 37-23 | 2160 | +18.7 | −7.7 | +0.35 | — |
| 6 | #19Denton Guyer (4-2) 2248 |
5% (-28) | L 7-51 | 1179 | −4.6 | +8.2 | — | −0.09 |
| 7 | Little Elm (3-3) 1426 |
74% (+10) | W 48-42 | 1797 | +23.7 | +11.9 | +0.16 | — |
| 8 | @Flower Mound Marcus (2-4) 1424 |
79% (+12) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | Frisco Wakeland (2-4) 1457 |
76% (+11) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | 5% (-29) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 11 | Lewisville Hebron (4-2) 1854 |
38% (-5) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#75
was #82
Record
5-1
2-1 district
Elo
1736
#75 of 249
OVR Grade
80.2
#75 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
78.8
#88 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
76.2
#110 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1673
#96 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 5-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Denton Braswell’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2021
5-5
Rating 636 (85th)
#2 · 2020
5-5
Rating 585 (73rd)
#3 · 2023
4-6
Rating 559 (65th)
#4 · 2022
3-7
Rating 552 (62nd)
#5 · 2025
2-8
Rating 465 (32nd)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.