| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kerrville Tivy |
9% (-23) | L 7-54 | 210 | −23.3 | +28.3 | — | −0.91 |
| 2 | San Antonio Stevens (2-5) 800 |
43% (-3) | L 32-35 | 488 | −11.1 | +29.3 | — | −0.99 |
| 3 | @Converse Wagner (1-4) 1053 |
16% (-16) | L 7-27 | 590 | −29.4 | +7.0 | — | −0.96 |
| 4 | San Antonio Southwest (1-4) 791 |
35% (-6) | L 7-14 | 711 | −27.9 | +3.6 | — | −0.99 |
| 5 | @Laredo Johnson (4-2) 1205 |
6% (-26) | L 0-34 | 377 | −35.3 | +9.6 | — | −0.93 |
| 7 | Laredo United South (2-4) 988 |
18% (-15) | L 7-38 | 280 | −25.0 | +23.8 | — | −0.98 |
| 8 | @San Antonio Southwest Legacy (2-3-1) 856 |
22% (-12) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | Laredo Alexander (4-2) 1319 |
4% (-31) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | Laredo United (3-2-1) 1549 |
< 2% (-40) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | @Eagle Pass (2-4) 1033 |
12% (-19) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#240
was #239
Record
0-6
0-3 district
Elo
547
#240 of 249
OVR Grade
62.2
#240 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
57.1
#245 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
60.6
#224 of 249 in 6A
Perf
443
#241 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 30-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance


Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Del Rio’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2011
9-3
Rating 586 (74th)
#2 · 2009
10-3
Rating 559 (65th)
#3 · 2016
10-2
Rating 556 (64th)
#4 · 2012
10-3
Rating 545 (60th)
#5 · 2015
9-4
Rating 540 (59th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.






