← Back

CLASS 6A · District 11-6A

Dallas Skyline Raiders

Enrollment: 3,573 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2

Rank

#163

was #163

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1327

#163 of 249

OVR Grade

74

#163 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@Mesquite	58% (+3)	—	—	—	—
2	Denton Braswell (0-0) 1358	47% (-1)	—	—	—	—
3	Grand Prairie (0-0) 766	91% (+22)	—	—	—	—
4	@Crowley (0-0) 1329	50% (0)	—	—	—	—
5	#3Waxahachie (0-0) 2622	< 2% (-52)	—	—	—	—
7	@Mansfield Lake Ridge (0-0) 1850	10% (-21)	—	—	—	—
8	@Mansfield (0-0) 1434	39% (-4)	—	—	—	—
9	#4North Crowley (0-0) 2608	< 2% (-51)	—	—	—	—
10	@Red Oak (0-0) 1605	24% (-11)	—	—	—	—
11	#2Duncanville (0-0) 2708	< 2% (-55)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 11-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		2	Duncanville (1) Panthers	94.8 2708	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.2-0.8	> 98%	D1
2		3	Waxahachie (3) Indians	93.5 2622	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.9-1.1	> 98%	D1
3		4	North Crowley (4) Panthers	93.3 2608	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.8-1.2	> 98%	D2
4		54	Mansfield Lake Ridge (5) Eagles	81.9 1850	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.5-3.5	71.9%	D2
5		90	Red Oak (8) Hawks	78.2 1605	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.5-4.5	18.4%	—
6		137	Mansfield (6) Tigers	75.6 1434	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.7-5.3	5.1%	—
7		163	Dallas Skyline (2) Raiders	74 1327	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.3-5.7	2.3%	—
8		161	Crowley (7) Eagles	74 1329	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.2-5.8	2.4%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Dallas Skyline’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2011

13-1

Rating 769 (98th)

#2 · 2014

14-1

Rating 749 (97th)

#3 · 2012

12-2

Rating 729 (96th)

#4 · 2013

11-2

Rating 715 (95th)

#5 · 2009

12-1

Rating 713 (95th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	1-8	1369	7.6	46.0	−38.4	2002	−9.6	+6.0	−15.7	1109	−3.27	+0.06	−3.33	481(37th)
2024	4-6	1671	22.2	28.1	−5.9	1918	+1.6	−10.1	+11.7	1793	−1.08	+1.01	−2.09	598(77th)
2023	3-7	1379	20.7	26.5	−5.8	1813	−2.0	−8.5	+6.4	1661	−2.74	+0.42	−3.17	547(61st)
2022	0-10	1060	5.2	36.9	−31.7	1884	−14.4	+1.1	−15.5	1112	−5.75	0.00	−5.75	444(26th)
2021	1-9	1353	15.3	30.5	−15.2	1700	−11.2	−3.4	−7.8	1306	−4.65	+0.04	−4.68	477(35th)
2020	5-4	1652	20.3	27.9	−7.6	1729	−3.3	−6.1	+2.8	1570	−0.30	+1.40	−1.70	542(59th)
2019	7-4	1694	29.8	21.3	+8.5	1400	+1.4	−4.7	+6.2	1654	−1.36	+0.57	−1.93	555(64th)
2018	7-3	1555	43.8	27.1	+16.7	1354	+10.3	+0.3	+10.0	1749	−0.79	+0.40	−1.19	556(64th)
2017	4-6	1390	30.8	37.4	−6.6	1648	+2.2	+2.7	−0.4	1489	−2.56	+0.27	−2.83	507(47th)
2016	5-6	1655	22.8	31.2	−8.4	1593	−7.0	−1.0	−6.0	1350	−2.17	+0.29	−2.46	512(49th)
2015	9-3	2283	35.0	13.3	+21.7	1537	+7.0	−16.1	+23.1	2076	+0.89	+1.99	−1.10	679(91st)
2014	14-1	2609	45.2	19.3	+25.9	1695	+17.9	−15.8	+33.7	2342	+5.00	+5.01	−0.01	749(97th)
2013	11-2	2430	46.0	19.8	+26.2	1623	+18.8	−11.6	+30.3	2258	+3.42	+3.86	−0.44	715(95th)
2012	12-2	2454	46.1	22.1	+23.9	1733	+19.4	−13.3	+32.7	2318	+4.45	+4.87	−0.42	729(96th)
2011	13-1	2467	43.1	12.1	+31.0	1670	+19.3	−19.5	+38.8	2471	+5.08	+5.13	−0.06	769(98th)
2010	9-2	2139	29.5	14.6	+14.9	1498	+4.3	−14.2	+18.5	1963	+1.53	+2.54	−1.01	659(89th)
2009	12-1	2207	45.6	13.6	+32.0	1531	+19.2	−13.2	+32.4	2311	+3.17	+3.52	−0.35	713(95th)
2008	12-2	2168	36.1	14.1	+21.9	1526	+9.9	−13.1	+23.0	2075	+2.81	+3.70	−0.89	688(93rd)
2007	12-2	2052	36.9	9.7	+27.1	1487	+10.1	−15.8	+25.9	2149	+2.00	+2.67	−0.67	695(93rd)
2006	7-4	1512	27.7	13.5	+14.2	1349	−1.6	−9.1	+7.5	1687	−1.93	+0.74	−2.67	565(67th)
2005	7-4	1517	23.1	16.4	+6.7	1354	−4.0	−4.9	+0.9	1522	−1.75	+0.60	−2.35	537(58th)
2004	7-4	1610	29.5	19.3	+10.2	1330	+1.0	−1.5	+2.5	1562	−1.56	+0.71	−2.27	546(61st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.