← Back
CLASS 6A · District 6-6A

Dallas Jesuit Rangers

Enrollment: 2,320 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 8
Rank
#111
was #111
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1511
#111 of 249
OVR Grade
76.8
#111 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@Garland Sachse (0-0) 1529
48% (-1)
2
#46Rockwall (0-0) 1908
16% (-16)
3
Forney (0-0) 1808
22% (-12)
4
@Princeton (0-0) 1131
83% (+15)
5
McKinney Boyd (0-0) 1305
70% (+8)
7
@#50Prosper Walnut Grove (0-0) 1890
17% (-15)
8
#24Prosper (0-0) 2154
6% (-26)
9
@#6Allen (0-0) 2516
< 2% (-40)
10
McKinney (0-0) 1488
52% (+1)
11
@Prosper Rock Hill (0-0) 1453
56% (+2)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 6-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 6
Eagles
91.9
2516
0-0 0-0 6.7-0.3 > 98% D1
2 24
Eagles
86.5
2154
0-0 0-0 5.7-1.3 > 98% D1
3 50
Wildcats
82.5
1890
0-0 0-0 4.7-2.3 94.8% D2
4 111
Rangers
76.8
1511
0-0 0-0 2.9-4.1 41.9% D2
5 116
Lions
76.4
1488
0-0 0-0 2.7-4.3 30.4%
6 132
Blue Hawks
75.9
1453
0-0 0-0 2.5-4.4 23.7%
7 165
Broncos
73.7
1305
0-0 0-0 1.8-5.2 7.8%
8 193
Panthers
71
1131
0-0 0-0 0.9-6.1 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Dallas Jesuit’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2019
9-5
Rating 676 (91st)
#2 · 2015
10-2
Rating 653 (88th)
#3 · 2012
8-3
Rating 636 (85th)
#4 · 2016
8-4
Rating 612 (81st)
#5 · 2021
10-2
Rating 611 (80th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 6-6 1598 29.5 28.2 +1.2 1355 +0.9 +2.3 −1.4 1466 −2.98 +0.40 −3.38 539(58th)
2024 6-5 1529 34.4 31.1 +3.3 1340 +3.5 +6.0 −2.5 1437 −2.88 +0.33 −3.22 518(51st)
2023 8-4 1760 33.7 23.9 +9.7 1388 +2.3 −3.7 +6.0 1649 −0.68 +1.42 −2.10 577(71st)
2022 9-3 1829 34.9 23.7 +11.2 1444 +5.2 −4.2 +9.4 1736 +0.59 +1.31 −0.72 592(76th)
2021 10-2 1970 39.8 26.3 +13.4 1474 +9.7 −2.9 +12.6 1815 +1.79 +1.95 −0.16 611(80th)
2020 7-4 1795 44.5 23.5 +20.9 1378 +12.5 −3.7 +16.2 1906 −1.26 +0.29 −1.55 592(76th)
2019 9-5 2123 33.0 27.2 +5.8 1861 +13.7 −7.9 +21.6 2040 +2.34 +3.64 −1.31 676(91st)
2018 2-8 1402 26.7 32.1 −5.4 1787 +1.8 −3.0 +4.8 1620 −3.77 +0.10 −3.87 532(56th)
2017 7-5 1835 46.6 41.5 +5.1 1630 +17.5 +8.4 +9.1 1728 −0.44 +0.69 −1.13 582(72nd)
2016 8-4 1970 40.5 30.5 +10.0 1667 +13.4 −2.1 +15.5 1887 +0.42 +1.44 −1.02 612(81st)
2015 10-2 1953 40.5 15.9 +24.6 1485 +10.9 −12.0 +22.8 2071 +1.45 +2.48 −1.03 653(88th)
2014 8-4 1681 46.4 36.1 +10.3 1420 +14.5 +6.4 +8.1 1703 −0.87 +0.62 −1.49 573(70th)
2013 9-3 1948 39.7 29.5 +10.2 1467 +9.6 −0.3 +9.9 1747 +0.62 +1.64 −1.02 604(79th)
2012 8-3 1887 44.1 20.4 +23.7 1435 +12.9 −8.0 +20.9 2023 +0.34 +1.28 −0.94 636(85th)
2011 8-3 1710 41.3 30.5 +10.7 1432 +12.3 +3.4 +9.0 1724 +0.28 +1.28 −1.00 571(69th)
2010 6-5 1637 36.5 28.4 +8.2 1530 +9.7 +0.4 +9.2 1731 −1.45 +0.66 −2.12 566(67th)
2009 4-6 1627 26.1 34.3 −8.2 1843 +4.2 −0.8 +5.0 1624 −1.01 +1.53 −2.54 561(66th)
2008 3-7 1533 24.1 38.2 −14.1 1877 +2.2 +2.4 −0.2 1494 −2.40 +0.39 −2.79 540(59th)
2007 6-5 1609 25.3 20.2 +5.1 1609 +1.8 −7.5 +9.3 1732 −1.36 +1.06 −2.42 566(67th)
2006 5-6 1521 22.0 24.4 −2.4 1677 +0.5 −4.3 +4.8 1619 −1.30 +0.87 −2.17 543(59th)
2005 4-6 1336 24.6 32.5 −7.9 1457 −2.1 +6.7 −8.9 1279 −4.02 +0.23 −4.24 481(37th)
2004 10-2 1766 30.2 22.3 +7.8 1458 +5.3 −1.7 +7.0 1675 +0.65 +1.70 −1.05 578(71st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.