← Back

CLASS 6A · District 16-6A

Cy Woods Wildcats

Enrollment: 3,539 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 1

Rank

#129

was #129

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1458

#129 of 249

OVR Grade

76

#129 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Katy Jordan (0-0) 1820	18% (-15)	—	—	—	—
2	@Katy Mayde Creek (0-0) 1364	60% (+4)	—	—	—	—
3	Fort Bend Austin (0-0) 901	91% (+22)	—	—	—	—
4	Jersey Village (0-0) 827	93% (+25)	—	—	—	—
6	@Cy-Fair (0-0) 1710	26% (-10)	—	—	—	—
7	@Langham Creek (0-0) 1612	34% (-6)	—	—	—	—
8	@Cy Creek (0-0) 1081	83% (+15)	—	—	—	—
9	@Cy Ridge (0-0) 730	95% (+29)	—	—	—	—
10	Cy Lakes (0-0) 1481	48% (-1)	—	—	—	—
11	@#36Cy Falls (0-0) 1963	11% (-20)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 16-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		36	Cy Falls (7) Golden Eagles	83.6 1963	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.3-0.7	> 98%	D2
2		73	Cy-Fair (3) Bobcats	79.8 1710	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.2-1.8	93.3%	D1
3		89	Langham Creek (6) Lobos	78.3 1612	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.7-2.3	85.2%	D2
4		119	Cy Lakes (4) Spartans	76.3 1481	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-3	64.7%	D1
5		129	Cy Woods (1) Wildcats	76 1458	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.9-3.1	52.9%	—
6		198	Cy Creek (5) Cougars	70.3 1081	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.1-4.9	4.1%	—
7		225	Jersey Village (2) Falcons	66.4 827	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-6	< 2%	—
8		235	Cy Ridge (8) Rams	65 730	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.7-6.3	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Cy Woods’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2011

9-3

Rating 650 (88th)

#2 · 2010

10-4

Rating 648 (87th)

#3 · 2009

11-3

Rating 643 (86th)

#4 · 2008

8-3

Rating 622 (83rd)

#5 · 2024

8-3

Rating 620 (82nd)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	4-6	1343	28.4	23.4	+5.0	1430	−3.2	−4.8	+1.6	1541	−3.94	+0.18	−4.12	515(50th)
2024	8-3	1822	41.9	19.4	+22.5	1431	+12.8	−7.4	+20.3	2006	−0.38	+1.04	−1.43	620(82nd)
2023	5-5	1451	35.0	31.1	+3.9	1432	+4.4	+5.1	−0.8	1481	−2.38	+0.18	−2.56	520(52nd)
2022	7-4	1617	25.6	20.9	+4.7	1455	−3.4	−5.6	+2.2	1555	−1.30	+0.96	−2.26	538(58th)
2021	6-5	1782	23.0	28.8	−5.8	1693	−1.9	−5.1	+3.2	1580	+0.12	+1.22	−1.10	552(63rd)
2020	6-4	1748	33.5	32.8	+0.7	1654	+5.8	−1.0	+6.7	1669	−0.37	+0.88	−1.25	556(64th)
2019	8-4	1793	30.0	27.7	+2.3	1515	+2.8	−1.7	+4.5	1614	−0.40	+1.94	−2.33	570(69th)
2018	7-4	1591	39.8	35.0	+4.8	1504	+11.8	+6.2	+5.6	1640	−1.05	+1.49	−2.54	545(60th)
2017	4-5	1549	28.8	30.0	−1.2	1621	+4.7	−0.2	+4.9	1623	−1.86	+0.93	−2.79	539(58th)
2016	2-8	1271	28.4	40.3	−11.9	1697	+0.1	+3.9	−3.8	1406	−4.62	+0.16	−4.78	485(38th)
2015	5-5	1843	44.4	40.7	+3.7	1602	+15.5	+6.4	+9.1	1727	−1.56	+1.28	−2.84	579(71st)
2014	8-5	1837	45.8	35.0	+10.8	1634	+21.0	+4.0	+17.1	1927	−1.04	+1.52	−2.56	616(82nd)
2013	8-4	1707	29.8	22.0	+7.8	1606	+4.8	−7.0	+11.8	1794	−0.16	+1.71	−1.87	588(74th)
2012	4-6	1558	29.6	32.1	−2.5	1567	−0.4	+0.1	−0.5	1486	−2.89	+0.53	−3.42	523(53rd)
2011	9-3	1949	41.3	21.8	+19.6	1600	+14.3	−9.6	+23.9	2098	+0.44	+1.74	−1.31	650(88th)
2010	10-4	2069	42.9	28.5	+14.4	1579	+15.7	−1.4	+17.1	1928	+0.08	+2.72	−2.64	648(87th)
2009	11-3	2079	32.9	26.5	+6.4	1718	+9.8	−6.1	+15.9	1897	+2.79	+4.15	−1.36	643(86th)
2008	8-3	1881	39.3	24.0	+15.3	1620	+14.6	−4.9	+19.5	1988	+0.72	+2.04	−1.33	622(83rd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.