← Back
CLASS 6A · District 23-6A

Cy Ranch Mustangs

Enrollment: 3,438 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2
Rank
#31
was #31
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
2039
#31 of 249
OVR Grade
84.7
#31 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1 77% (+11)
2
#7Sheldon CE King (0-0) 2509
12% (-19)
3
Aldine Nimitz (0-0) 1474
91% (+23)
5
#32Bridgeland (0-0) 2023
52% (+1)
6 97% (+32)
7
#39Fulshear (0-0) 1944
60% (+4)
8
@Cy Park (0-0) 764
> 98% (+51)
9
#41Waller (0-0) 1938
60% (+4)
10
@Richmond Foster (0-0) 1325
95% (+29)
11
Cy Springs (0-0) 1592
87% (+18)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 23-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 31
Mustangs
84.7
2039
0-0 0-0 5.5-1.5 96% D1
2 32
Bears
84.5
2023
0-0 0-0 5.4-1.6 95.6% D1
3 39
Chargers
83.3
1944
0-0 0-0 5-2 91.4% D2
4 41
Bulldogs
83.2
1938
0-0 0-0 5-2 90.6% D2
5 96
Panthers
78
1592
0-0 0-0 3.2-3.8 22.5%
6 164
Falcons
74
1325
0-0 0-0 2-5 2.9%
7 176
Longhorns
72.6
1232
0-0 0-0 1.6-5.4 < 2%
8 230
Tigers
65.5
764
0-0 0-0 0.3-6.7 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Cy Ranch’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2018
11-1
Rating 691 (93rd)
#2 · 2014
13-3
Rating 689 (93rd)
#3 · 2016
11-1
Rating 671 (90th)
#4 · 2015
10-2
Rating 670 (90th)
#5 · 2025
10-3
Rating 665 (90th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 10-3 2099 35.6 20.1 +15.5 1617 +10.0 −13.1 +23.1 2077 +1.44 +3.05 −1.62 665(90th)
2024 8-4 1876 27.2 22.4 +4.8 1526 +0.8 −7.4 +8.2 1705 +0.13 +1.90 −1.77 595(76th)
2023 6-5 1600 34.5 28.4 +6.1 1468 +5.6 +1.4 +4.2 1605 −1.58 +0.61 −2.19 550(62nd)
2022 7-4 1728 39.1 20.5 +18.5 1504 +11.2 −8.0 +19.1 1978 −0.57 +1.24 −1.80 604(79th)
2021 6-4 1806 40.4 29.0 +11.4 1544 +12.7 −1.6 +14.3 1858 −0.61 +1.48 −2.08 591(75th)
2020 7-3 1856 34.4 14.4 +20.0 1533 +4.2 −16.4 +20.6 2014 +0.22 +1.14 −0.92 623(83rd)
2019 8-4 1888 34.8 22.0 +12.8 1580 +7.8 −7.6 +15.4 1886 −0.13 +1.41 −1.54 612(81st)
2018 11-1 2249 36.7 15.2 +21.4 1610 +11.3 −14.7 +26.0 2151 +3.79 +3.89 −0.10 691(93rd)
2017 8-3 1996 21.3 17.1 +4.2 1640 −2.6 −14.2 +11.6 1790 +0.29 +1.14 −0.85 617(82nd)
2016 11-1 2260 43.2 23.2 +20.0 1619 +14.0 −11.2 +25.2 2130 +2.68 +2.73 −0.05 671(90th)
2015 10-2 2239 39.2 22.9 +16.2 1644 +11.7 −11.0 +22.8 2069 +1.86 +2.32 −0.46 670(90th)
2014 13-3 2309 34.8 23.6 +11.1 1728 +10.4 −9.5 +19.9 1998 +4.14 +5.08 −0.93 689(93rd)
2013 5-5 1608 31.1 30.9 +0.2 1568 +6.6 +3.5 +3.1 1578 −2.16 +0.84 −2.99 540(59th)
2012 9-5 1942 36.8 35.1 +1.6 1667 +10.5 +1.9 +8.5 1713 +1.04 +3.44 −2.40 605(79th)
2011 6-4 1507 30.4 29.9 +0.5 1514 +2.0 −0.3 +2.4 1559 −0.98 +0.93 −1.91 531(56th)
2010 4-6 1144 23.4 31.6 −8.2 1454 −5.5 +4.1 −9.6 1261 −3.91 +0.52 −4.43 458(30th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.