← Back
CLASS 6A · District 23-6A

Cy Park Tigers

Enrollment: 3,047 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5
Rank
#226
was #222
Record
1-5
0-3 district
Elo
782
#226 of 249
OVR Grade
65.8
#226 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
60.4
#238 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
65
#209 of 249 in 6A
Perf
687
#227 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
Alief Hastings (3-4) 1088
 29% (-8) L 21-23 1076 −12.1 +4.8 — −0.97
2
Cy Ridge (3-3) 644
 64% (+6) L 27-28 510 −23.0 +16.6 — −0.99
3
@Cy Creek (0-6) 788
 26% (-10) W 18-12 896 −23.2 +1.0 +0.02 —
5
@Cy Springs (2-4) 1559
 4% (-31) L 3-65 178 −26.0 +26.8 — −0.73
6
#50Waller (5-1) 1950
 < 2% (-44) L 13-58 932 −9.2 +13.5 — −0.44
7
@Richmond Foster (2-4) 1233
 16% (-16) L 0-24 531 −31.0 +7.7 — −0.94
8
#25Cy Ranch (5-1) 2165
 < 2% (-55) — — — — — —
9
@#24Bridgeland (5-1) 2199
 < 2% (-57) — — — — — —
10
Richmond George Ranch (3-3) 1355
 8% (-23) — — — — — —
11
@#47Fulshear (5-1) 1966
 < 2% (-47) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 23-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 24
Bears
87.2
2199
 5-1 3-0 36.3 22.7 6.4-0.6 > 98% D1
2 25
Mustangs
86.6
2165
 5-1 2-1 33.5 15.0 5.6-1.4 > 98% D1
3 47
Chargers
83.6
1966
 5-1 2-1 34.7 12.3 5-2 96.2% D2
4 50
Bulldogs
83.4
1950
 5-1 2-1 47.8 21.5 4.4-2.6 95.8% D2
5 107
Panthers
77.5
1559
 2-4 1-2 35.2 34.8 2.7-4.3 5.2% —
6 153
Longhorns
74.4
1355
 3-3 1-2 22.3 31.3 2.4-4.6 3.5% —
7 171
Falcons
72.6
1233
 2-4 1-2 15.7 29.5 1.3-5.7 < 2% —
8 226
Tigers
65.8
782
 1-5 0-3 13.7 35.0 0.1-6.9 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Cy Park’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2021
9-2
Rating 644 (86th)
#2 · 2020
6-5
Rating 543 (60th)
#3 · 2019
3-7
Rating 468 (33rd)
#4 · 2022
0-10
Rating 379 (11th)
#5 · 2023
0-10
Rating 379 (11th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 0-10 699 7.5 54.8 −47.3 1701 −16.5 +20.4 −36.9 578 −6.58 0.00 −6.58 329(5th)
2024 0-10 798 5.8 45.9 −40.1 1627 −18.2 +14.1 −32.4 691 −6.93 0.00 −6.93 352(7th)
2023 0-10 754 15.0 43.8 −28.8 1662 −12.5 +11.7 −24.3 893 −6.38 0.00 −6.38 379(11th)
2022 0-10 992 15.6 49.2 −33.6 1607 −10.0 +18.5 −28.5 787 −6.85 0.00 −6.85 379(11th)
2021 9-2 1862 52.0 23.1 +28.9 1509 +23.4 −5.0 +28.4 2211 +1.31 +2.58 −1.28 644(86th)
2020 6-5 1655 41.8 39.0 +2.8 1554 +12.3 +7.1 +5.2 1631 −0.72 +0.93 −1.65 543(60th)
2019 3-7 1203 24.9 36.2 −11.3 1599 −1.3 +5.4 −6.8 1330 −3.81 +0.19 −3.99 468(33rd)
2018 0-10 792 9.1 48.5 −39.4 1581 −17.2 +18.9 −36.1 596 −6.72 0.00 −6.72 334(5th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.