← Back

CLASS 6A · District 16-6A

Cy Lakes Spartans

Enrollment: 3,038 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4

Rank

#119

was #119

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1481

#119 of 249

OVR Grade

76.3

#119 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Katy Freeman	76% (+11)	—	—	—	—
2	Aldine Davis (0-0) 1416	57% (+3)	—	—	—	—
3	@Spring (0-0) 955	90% (+21)	—	—	—	—
4	@Langham Creek (0-0) 1612	37% (-5)	—	—	—	—
6	Cy Ridge (0-0) 730	96% (+30)	—	—	—	—
7	@#36Cy Falls (0-0) 1963	12% (-19)	—	—	—	—
8	Cy-Fair (0-0) 1710	28% (-9)	—	—	—	—
9	@Cy Creek (0-0) 1081	84% (+16)	—	—	—	—
10	@Cy Woods (0-0) 1458	52% (+1)	—	—	—	—
11	Jersey Village (0-0) 827	94% (+26)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 16-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		36	Cy Falls (7) Golden Eagles	83.6 1963	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.3-0.7	> 98%	D2
2		73	Cy-Fair (3) Bobcats	79.8 1710	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.2-1.8	93.3%	D1
3		89	Langham Creek (6) Lobos	78.3 1612	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.7-2.3	85.2%	D2
4		119	Cy Lakes (4) Spartans	76.3 1481	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-3	64.7%	D1
5		129	Cy Woods (1) Wildcats	76 1458	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.9-3.1	52.9%	—
6		198	Cy Creek (5) Cougars	70.3 1081	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.1-4.9	4.1%	—
7		225	Jersey Village (2) Falcons	66.4 827	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-6	< 2%	—
8		235	Cy Ridge (8) Rams	65 730	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.7-6.3	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Cy Lakes’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2025

6-6

Rating 604 (79th)

#2 · 2019

5-5

Rating 545 (60th)

#3 · 2018

5-5

Rating 510 (48th)

#4 · 2024

4-6

Rating 496 (42nd)

#5 · 2011

1-9

Rating 446 (27th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	6-6	1878	27.3	23.9	+3.4	1634	+2.1	−8.5	+10.6	1766	−1.52	+1.70	−3.22	604(79th)
2024	4-6	1218	26.7	30.9	−4.2	1574	+1.4	+2.2	−0.9	1478	−3.49	+0.31	−3.80	496(42nd)
2023	3-7	886	20.7	35.3	−14.6	1280	−12.3	+10.3	−22.6	935	−5.03	+0.04	−5.07	397(14th)
2022	2-8	764	12.2	35.6	−23.4	1307	−19.0	+12.3	−31.3	716	−6.41	+0.10	−6.51	349(7th)
2021	0-10	795	6.0	46.5	−40.5	1569	−20.6	+15.9	−36.5	588	−7.08	0.00	−7.08	331(5th)
2020	0-9	998	15.1	43.2	−28.1	1560	−14.1	+11.5	−25.5	862	−6.36	0.00	−6.36	381(11th)
2019	5-5	1483	42.0	29.9	+12.1	1388	+12.6	+3.8	+8.8	1721	−2.69	+0.28	−2.97	545(60th)
2018	5-5	1366	26.3	21.5	+4.8	1406	−3.7	−4.9	+1.2	1531	−2.77	+0.38	−3.14	510(48th)
2017	0-9	871	13.2	34.4	−21.2	1696	−10.3	+2.7	−13.0	1175	−6.36	0.00	−6.36	418(19th)
2016	2-8	1002	26.6	41.5	−14.9	1535	−3.9	+7.8	−11.7	1208	−5.21	+0.29	−5.50	434(23rd)
2015	1-9	811	17.3	43.8	−26.5	1546	−13.2	+9.8	−23.1	923	−6.17	+0.01	−6.18	378(11th)
2014	0-10	745	8.6	44.8	−36.2	1571	−18.2	+13.5	−31.7	707	−7.62	0.00	−7.62	344(6th)
2013	1-9	1066	14.1	31.4	−17.3	1497	−11.7	+4.7	−16.5	1088	−6.35	+0.24	−6.59	425(21st)
2012	0-10	850	17.2	50.2	−33.0	1530	−12.5	+18.5	−31.0	725	−7.03	0.00	−7.03	359(8th)
2011	1-9	1028	27.3	43.4	−16.1	1637	+0.5	+10.5	−10.0	1250	−5.83	+0.02	−5.86	446(27th)
2010	1-9	990	12.5	37.6	−25.1	1598	−14.1	+6.5	−20.5	987	−6.22	+0.09	−6.32	409(17th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.