← Back

CLASS 6A · District 16-6A

Cy-Fair Bobcats

Enrollment: 3,168 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 3

Rank

#73

was #73

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1710

#73 of 249

OVR Grade

79.8

#73 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Tomball Memorial (0-0) 1505	70% (+8)	—	—	—	—
2	@#25The Woodlands College Park (0-0) 2150	14% (-18)	—	—	—	—
3	Cy Springs (0-0) 1592	62% (+5)	—	—	—	—
5	@#36Cy Falls (0-0) 1963	26% (-10)	—	—	—	—
6	Cy Woods (0-0) 1458	74% (+10)	—	—	—	—
7	Cy Creek (0-0) 1081	93% (+25)	—	—	—	—
8	@Cy Lakes (0-0) 1481	72% (+9)	—	—	—	—
9	Jersey Village (0-0) 827	98% (+35)	—	—	—	—
10	@Langham Creek (0-0) 1612	60% (+4)	—	—	—	—
11	Cy Ridge (0-0) 730	> 98% (+39)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 16-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		36	Cy Falls (7) Golden Eagles	83.6 1963	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.3-0.7	> 98%	D2
2		73	Cy-Fair (3) Bobcats	79.8 1710	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.2-1.8	93.3%	D1
3		89	Langham Creek (6) Lobos	78.3 1612	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.7-2.3	85.2%	D2
4		119	Cy Lakes (4) Spartans	76.3 1481	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-3	64.7%	D1
5		129	Cy Woods (1) Wildcats	76 1458	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.9-3.1	52.9%	—
6		198	Cy Creek (5) Cougars	70.3 1081	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.1-4.9	4.1%	—
7		225	Jersey Village (2) Falcons	66.4 827	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-6	< 2%	—
8		235	Cy Ridge (8) Rams	65 730	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.7-6.3	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Cy-Fair’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2017

15-0

Rating 827 (99th)

#2 · 2019

11-1

Rating 739 (97th)

#3 · 2018

11-3

Rating 730 (96th)

#4 · 2006

12-2

Rating 707 (94th)

#5 · 2011

12-1

Rating 689 (93rd)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	7-4	1536	38.5	28.3	+10.2	1322	+4.1	+1.9	+2.2	1554	−1.21	+0.92	−2.13	534(57th)
2024	7-4	1721	34.2	19.3	+14.9	1362	+2.7	−5.7	+8.4	1709	−1.14	+0.76	−1.90	572(69th)
2023	11-2	2251	41.1	19.6	+21.5	1307	+7.9	−5.0	+12.9	1823	+0.94	+1.67	−0.73	649(87th)
2022	10-2	2127	43.7	16.1	+27.6	1306	+9.7	−8.3	+18.0	1949	+1.81	+2.69	−0.88	654(88th)
2021	7-4	1812	37.5	21.9	+15.6	1456	+7.5	−6.0	+13.5	1837	−0.83	+1.41	−2.24	590(75th)
2020	10-2	2151	42.2	14.4	+27.8	1412	+12.3	−12.0	+24.3	2107	+1.03	+1.40	−0.37	663(89th)
2019	11-1	2398	40.9	8.0	+32.9	1474	+14.2	−18.0	+32.2	2305	+2.60	+2.64	−0.04	739(97th)
2018	11-3	2431	37.5	12.9	+24.6	1640	+12.3	−16.9	+29.1	2228	+2.50	+3.87	−1.38	730(96th)
2017	15-0	2637	34.0	12.7	+21.3	1706	+11.1	−19.8	+30.9	2273	+6.41	+6.41	0.00	827(99th)
2016	8-3	2004	35.0	16.9	+18.1	1695	+6.2	−19.6	+25.9	2147	+1.16	+1.71	−0.56	655(88th)
2015	6-5	1601	22.0	21.8	+0.2	1627	−6.3	−12.6	+6.3	1658	−1.27	+1.15	−2.42	548(61st)
2014	9-4	1979	29.9	14.8	+15.1	1655	+5.4	−17.6	+23.0	2076	+0.62	+2.52	−1.90	659(89th)
2013	12-2	2019	25.6	12.6	+13.1	1582	+1.4	−15.4	+16.8	1921	+2.41	+3.42	−1.01	653(88th)
2012	7-4	1705	31.5	21.1	+10.4	1487	+0.9	−8.9	+9.8	1745	−1.08	+1.53	−2.61	571(69th)
2011	12-1	2138	32.6	10.7	+21.9	1557	+4.2	−19.5	+23.7	2092	+3.74	+3.94	−0.21	689(93rd)
2010	9-3	1695	25.1	19.9	+5.2	1546	−2.8	−10.2	+7.5	1687	+0.53	+1.67	−1.14	567(68th)
2009	0-10	998	13.2	33.7	−20.5	1769	−9.5	+2.0	−11.4	1214	−6.09	0.00	−6.09	443(26th)
2008	1-8	1248	15.2	27.8	−12.6	1637	−9.0	−3.3	−5.7	1357	−6.29	+0.04	−6.33	481(37th)
2007	8-5	1933	33.8	27.5	+6.2	1576	+9.8	−1.1	+10.9	1771	−0.36	+1.55	−1.91	611(80th)
2006	12-2	2107	35.4	11.1	+24.2	1578	+12.1	−16.1	+28.1	2204	+1.76	+2.46	−0.70	707(94th)
2005	10-3	1814	29.0	12.0	+17.0	1482	+5.3	−11.8	+17.1	1928	−0.16	+1.67	−1.83	631(84th)
2004	7-3	1616	29.9	14.4	+15.5	1297	+2.1	−4.9	+7.0	1675	−1.75	+0.83	−2.58	573(70th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.