← Back
CLASS 6A · District 16-6A

Cy Creek Cougars

Enrollment: 3,034 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5
Rank
#198
was #198
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1081
#198 of 249
OVR Grade
70.3
#198 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@Katy Morton Ranch (0-0) 1182
40% (-4)
2
@Magnolia West (0-0) 1164
41% (-3)
3
Cy Park (0-0) 764
79% (+13)
5
@Cy Ridge (0-0) 730
81% (+14)
6
#36Cy Falls (0-0) 1963
2% (-35)
7
@Cy-Fair (0-0) 1710
7% (-25)
8
Cy Woods (0-0) 1458
17% (-15)
9
Cy Lakes (0-0) 1481
16% (-16)
10
@Jersey Village (0-0) 827
74% (+10)
11
Langham Creek (0-0) 1612
10% (-21)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 16-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 36
Golden Eagles
83.6
1963
0-0 0-0 6.3-0.7 > 98% D2
2 73
Bobcats
79.8
1710
0-0 0-0 5.2-1.8 93.3% D1
3 89
Lobos
78.3
1612
0-0 0-0 4.7-2.3 85.2% D2
4 119
Spartans
76.3
1481
0-0 0-0 4-3 64.7% D1
5 129
Wildcats
76
1458
0-0 0-0 3.9-3.1 52.9%
6 198
Cougars
70.3
1081
0-0 0-0 2.1-4.9 4.1%
7 225
Falcons
66.4
827
0-0 0-0 1-6 < 2%
8 235
Rams
65
730
0-0 0-0 0.7-6.3 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Cy Creek’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2018
8-6
Rating 627 (84th)
#2 · 2009
9-2
Rating 626 (84th)
#3 · 2008
8-2
Rating 616 (81st)
#4 · 2019
9-5
Rating 613 (81st)
#5 · 2010
9-4
Rating 612 (81st)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 3-7 1015 23.5 36.2 −12.7 1325 −9.3 +10.0 −19.4 1015 −4.59 +0.04 −4.63 415(18th)
2024 2-8 1107 21.7 45.1 −23.4 1418 −7.3 +18.8 −26.1 848 −5.54 +0.06 −5.60 402(15th)
2023 3-7 1163 22.5 35.2 −12.7 1332 −10.2 +10.7 −21.0 976 −4.93 +0.01 −4.95 428(21st)
2022 5-5 1403 39.1 30.0 +9.1 1392 +6.7 +3.2 +3.5 1587 −1.93 +0.49 −2.41 522(53rd)
2021 4-6 1242 34.3 41.6 −7.3 1390 +4.0 +14.2 −10.2 1244 −3.46 +0.16 −3.62 458(30th)
2020 4-7 1350 30.9 30.5 +0.5 1399 −0.3 +3.2 −3.5 1413 −4.58 +0.23 −4.80 486(39th)
2019 9-5 1920 36.6 22.1 +14.5 1554 +10.1 −4.2 +14.2 1856 +0.32 +2.38 −2.06 613(81st)
2018 8-6 1881 33.0 18.6 +14.4 1565 +7.9 −9.4 +17.3 1932 −1.13 +1.73 −2.86 627(84th)
2017 4-5 1330 32.2 35.4 −3.2 1645 +8.7 +5.5 +3.2 1580 −2.34 +0.50 −2.84 513(49th)
2016 5-5 1541 31.0 37.0 −6.0 1594 +0.9 +1.5 −0.6 1484 −1.91 +0.41 −2.32 519(52nd)
2015 7-5 1533 35.0 33.2 +1.8 1581 +5.3 −0.1 +5.4 1635 −1.03 +1.18 −2.21 539(58th)
2014 4-6 1450 31.1 31.1 0.0 1633 +4.6 −0.9 +5.5 1637 −2.63 +0.57 −3.20 532(56th)
2013 4-6 1222 24.5 27.7 −3.2 1598 −0.6 −0.3 −0.3 1493 −3.01 +0.91 −3.92 493(42nd)
2012 6-4 1658 29.9 25.0 +4.9 1517 −1.8 −6.7 +4.9 1624 −0.65 +1.66 −2.31 551(62nd)
2011 3-7 1272 20.7 28.1 −7.4 1632 −7.1 −5.4 −1.8 1456 −3.92 +0.89 −4.81 496(43rd)
2010 9-4 1980 33.9 27.4 +6.5 1613 +7.4 −3.2 +10.5 1764 +0.08 +2.34 −2.26 612(81st)
2009 9-2 1974 38.8 23.4 +15.5 1562 +12.6 −6.0 +18.6 1964 +1.30 +2.33 −1.02 626(84th)
2008 8-2 1845 40.5 27.2 +13.3 1637 +15.6 −3.1 +18.7 1968 +1.51 +2.09 −0.58 616(81st)
2007 2-8 1145 25.0 35.1 −10.1 1585 −0.6 +7.0 −7.6 1310 −4.81 +0.06 −4.87 467(32nd)
2006 5-5 1389 35.0 36.7 −1.7 1541 +10.7 +9.3 +1.4 1535 −2.75 +0.68 −3.43 519(52nd)
2005 8-3 1625 23.0 15.7 +7.3 1462 −0.7 −6.9 +6.3 1656 −0.60 +1.10 −1.70 566(67th)
2004 6-4 1344 23.3 23.8 −0.5 1323 −3.5 +4.1 −7.6 1309 −2.74 +0.47 −3.21 488(40th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.