| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lewisville Hebron (4-2) 1854 |
85% (+17) | W 40-10 | 2467 | +18.1 | −20.5 | +0.40 | — |
| 2 | 14% (-17) | L 24-27 | 2477 | +10.4 | −28.6 | — | −0.04 | |
| 3 | Keller Timber Creek (3-3) 1510 |
96% (+31) | W 68-7 | 2889 | +35.2 | −20.4 | +0.13 | — |
| 4 | @Richardson Berkner (2-4) 1624 |
93% (+25) | W 42-14 | 2431 | +19.4 | −17.8 | +0.24 | — |
| 5 | Richardson Pearce (0-6) 1004 |
> 98% (+48) | W 55-10 | 2093 | +18.8 | −5.0 | +0.03 | — |
| 7 | @Plano (2-4) 1451 |
96% (+30) | W 26-10 | 1817 | −1.5 | −14.2 | +0.16 | — |
| 8 | @Richardson Lake Highlands (4-2) 1695 |
90% (+21) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | Plano West (2-4) 1342 |
97% (+35) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | @Richardson (1-5) 1192 |
> 98% (+41) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | Plano East (4-2) 1678 |
90% (+21) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#21
was #21
Record
5-1
3-0 district
Elo
2214
#21 of 249
OVR Grade
87.4
#21 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
86.8
#27 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
90.1
#18 of 249 in 6A
Perf
2362
#19 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 7-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Coppell’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2010
13-1
Rating 774 (98th)
#2 · 2013
9-2
Rating 769 (98th)
#3 · 2024
12-1
Rating 746 (97th)
#4 · 2012
11-1
Rating 743 (97th)
#5 · 2009
11-2
Rating 699 (94th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.