← Back

CLASS 6A · District 13-6A

Conroe Tigers

Enrollment: 5,304 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 1

Rank

#117

was #117

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1483

#117 of 249

OVR Grade

76.4

#117 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@#7Sheldon CE King (0-0) 2509	< 2% (-41)	—	—	—	—
2	Katy Morton Ranch (0-0) 1182	78% (+12)	—	—	—	—
3	#41Waller (0-0) 1938	13% (-18)	—	—	—	—
5	Conroe Grand Oaks (0-0) 1830	19% (-14)	—	—	—	—
6	@Conroe Oak Ridge (0-0) 1217	75% (+11)	—	—	—	—
7	Conroe Caney Creek (0-0) 712	96% (+31)	—	—	—	—
8	@#25The Woodlands College Park (0-0) 2150	6% (-27)	—	—	—	—
9	#43The Woodlands (0-0) 1934	13% (-18)	—	—	—	—
10	@Cleveland (0-0) 382	> 98% (+44)	—	—	—	—
11	#20Willis (0-0) 2169	5% (-27)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 13-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		20	Willis (7) Wildkats	86.7 2169	0-0	0-0	—	—	6-1	> 98%	D2
2		25	The Woodlands College Park (5) Cavaliers	86.4 2150	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.9-1.1	> 98%	D2
3		43	The Woodlands (2) Highlanders	83.2 1934	0-0	0-0	—	—	5-2	94.5%	D1
4		57	Conroe Grand Oaks (3) Grizzlies	81.6 1830	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.5-2.5	87.3%	D1
5		117	Conroe (1) Tigers	76.4 1483	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.1-3.9	17.3%	—
6		179	Conroe Oak Ridge (8) War Eagles	72.3 1217	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.3-4.7	2.7%	—
7		238	Conroe Caney Creek (6) Panthers	64.7 712	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-6	< 2%	—
8		248	Cleveland (4) Indians	59.7 382	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.2-6.8	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Conroe’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2008

6-4

Rating 580 (72nd)

#2 · 2024

9-3

Rating 580 (72nd)

#3 · 2007

8-3

Rating 570 (69th)

#4 · 2023

6-5

Rating 553 (63rd)

#5 · 2022

6-5

Rating 549 (62nd)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	6-4	1567	27.4	20.5	+6.9	1354	−3.7	−4.9	+1.3	1532	−1.37	+0.32	−1.69	534(57th)
2024	9-3	1800	28.8	20.6	+8.2	1435	−3.0	−8.4	+5.4	1635	+0.35	+1.03	−0.68	580(72nd)
2023	6-5	1657	31.6	28.1	+3.5	1517	+2.6	−1.1	+3.7	1592	−1.27	+0.73	−1.99	553(63rd)
2022	6-5	1608	33.6	30.7	+2.9	1566	+6.5	+0.6	+6.0	1649	−1.55	+0.52	−2.07	549(62nd)
2021	5-6	1560	28.9	37.7	−8.8	1706	+5.7	+4.1	+1.7	1541	−1.95	+0.75	−2.70	526(54th)
2020	3-7	1310	27.2	24.9	+2.3	1445	−0.8	−1.9	+1.0	1526	−4.79	+0.53	−5.31	498(43rd)
2019	5-5	1404	33.6	28.9	+4.7	1579	+8.7	+0.3	+8.3	1709	−2.34	+0.59	−2.93	537(58th)
2018	3-7	1188	26.3	42.1	−15.8	1571	+0.3	+11.6	−11.3	1218	−3.75	+0.10	−3.85	452(28th)
2017	1-7	1109	17.4	36.1	−18.8	1621	−7.9	+5.3	−13.1	1172	−3.98	+0.04	−4.01	439(24th)
2016	3-7	1198	27.0	37.4	−10.4	1563	−2.2	+6.0	−8.2	1295	−4.04	+0.26	−4.31	464(31st)
2015	4-6	1237	21.7	32.7	−11.0	1431	−6.8	+7.1	−13.9	1152	−3.41	+0.22	−3.63	447(27th)
2014	3-7	1149	32.7	33.4	−0.7	1416	+4.6	+8.0	−3.4	1415	−4.44	+0.14	−4.58	475(35th)
2013	4-6	1177	25.0	36.4	−11.4	1530	−3.3	+9.0	−12.3	1192	−3.23	+0.45	−3.68	449(27th)
2012	3-8	1162	25.3	44.2	−18.9	1523	−1.1	+15.7	−16.8	1079	−4.39	+0.22	−4.61	434(23rd)
2011	2-8	1262	22.2	35.5	−13.3	1595	−2.2	+7.0	−9.2	1269	−5.08	+0.18	−5.26	470(33rd)
2010	1-9	1149	14.6	37.7	−23.1	1556	−11.9	+8.1	−20.0	1000	−6.22	+0.15	−6.37	424(21st)
2009	5-6	1541	26.6	29.6	−3.0	1619	+3.4	+1.5	+1.9	1547	−2.23	+0.51	−2.73	532(56th)
2008	6-4	1689	28.1	17.4	+10.7	1501	+3.8	−7.3	+11.1	1777	−1.35	+1.04	−2.38	580(72nd)
2007	8-3	1710	25.1	17.7	+7.4	1464	+0.4	−6.5	+6.9	1672	−0.01	+1.30	−1.30	570(69th)
2006	5-5	1419	18.1	17.9	+0.2	1519	−6.4	−7.2	+0.9	1522	−2.56	+0.60	−3.16	523(53rd)
2005	5-5	1518	18.7	20.9	−2.2	1548	−3.1	−3.6	+0.5	1512	−2.13	+0.80	−2.93	528(55th)
2004	5-5	1395	21.1	28.8	−7.7	1527	−2.0	+2.9	−4.8	1379	−2.61	+0.33	−2.95	503(45th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.