← Back
CLASS 6A · District 18-6A

Clear Springs Chargers

Enrollment: 2,764 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 3
Rank
#94
was #94
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1594
#94 of 249
OVR Grade
78
#94 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@Pasadena Dobie (0-0) 1430
67% (+7)
2
Houston Heights (0-0) 1521
58% (+3)
3 82% (+14)
4
Clear Creek (0-0) 1136
87% (+18)
5
@#13Dickinson (0-0) 2378
4% (-31)
6
@Deer Park (0-0) 1800
30% (-8)
8
@Clear Falls (0-0) 1685
41% (-4)
9
Clear Brook (0-0) 739
97% (+34)
10
@Clear Lake (0-0) 965
93% (+25)
11
Barbers Hill (0-0) 1822
28% (-9)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 18-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 13
Gators
89.9
2378
0-0 0-0 6.7-0.3 > 98% D1
2 58
Eagles
81.5
1822
0-0 0-0 4.9-2.1 90% D2
3 63
Deer
81.1
1800
0-0 0-0 4.8-2.2 88.6% D1
4 78
Knights
79.4
1685
0-0 0-0 4.2-2.8 73.4% D2
5 94
Chargers
78
1594
0-0 0-0 3.8-3.2 46.1%
6 191
Wildcats
71.1
1136
0-0 0-0 1.9-5.2 < 2%
7 210
Falcons
68.5
965
0-0 0-0 1.2-5.8 < 2%
8 233
Wolverines
65.1
739
0-0 0-0 0.5-6.5 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Clear Springs’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2023
7-5
Rating 657 (89th)
#2 · 2016
9-2
Rating 654 (88th)
#3 · 2017
8-3
Rating 654 (88th)
#4 · 2022
8-4
Rating 647 (87th)
#5 · 2021
7-5
Rating 644 (86th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 7-4 1742 27.9 27.4 +0.5 1613 −1.1 −6.3 +5.2 1630 +0.10 +1.09 −0.99 562(66th)
2024 8-3 2007 31.1 20.5 +10.6 1629 +2.7 −12.0 +14.7 1866 +0.97 +2.16 −1.18 618(82nd)
2023 7-5 2020 30.8 20.2 +10.6 1744 +10.2 −10.8 +21.0 2024 +0.23 +1.60 −1.37 657(89th)
2022 8-4 1983 30.8 21.8 +9.1 1751 +10.2 −10.9 +21.1 2028 +1.15 +1.89 −0.74 647(87th)
2021 7-5 1983 38.2 29.8 +8.5 1837 +16.4 −5.4 +21.8 2045 +0.59 +1.21 −0.62 644(86th)
2020 7-4 1984 32.6 20.1 +12.5 1741 +12.4 −10.2 +22.6 2064 +0.63 +1.77 −1.14 633(85th)
2019 6-5 1906 32.5 23.0 +9.5 1736 +8.5 −10.3 +18.8 1971 −0.13 +0.57 −0.70 618(82nd)
2018 7-4 2005 37.5 26.2 +11.4 1751 +12.8 −8.2 +21.0 2025 +0.90 +1.74 −0.83 637(85th)
2017 8-3 2067 34.8 20.8 +14.0 1721 +9.7 −12.7 +22.4 2060 +1.61 +2.25 −0.64 654(88th)
2016 9-2 2171 36.8 20.7 +16.1 1641 +13.3 −9.4 +22.7 2067 +2.80 +3.33 −0.54 654(88th)
2015 6-6 1664 30.2 28.8 +1.4 1721 +5.2 −2.9 +8.1 1703 −1.39 +0.94 −2.33 571(69th)
2014 6-6 1612 29.5 30.1 −0.6 1629 +3.5 −1.0 +4.5 1612 −1.73 +0.84 −2.57 550(62nd)
2013 6-5 1505 34.0 39.6 −5.6 1576 +9.1 +10.9 −1.8 1455 −1.55 +1.45 −3.00 514(49th)
2012 8-3 1889 35.4 24.1 +11.3 1510 +7.4 −3.8 +11.2 1780 −0.51 +1.56 −2.07 592(76th)
2011 8-4 1916 37.5 25.1 +12.4 1558 +11.3 −1.9 +13.2 1829 −0.61 +1.92 −2.53 604(79th)
2010 8-3 1997 41.7 28.6 +13.1 1691 +16.6 −3.3 +20.0 1999 +0.93 +1.82 −0.89 635(85th)
2009 11-2 1938 33.5 18.7 +14.8 1418 +6.2 −5.8 +12.0 1801 +0.50 +2.36 −1.86 602(78th)
2008 5-4 1238 16.9 20.9 −4.0 1421 −8.7 −1.4 −7.3 1317 −2.36 +0.87 −3.23 475(35th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.