← Back
CLASS 6A · District 18-6A

Clear Lake Falcons

Enrollment: 2,590 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5
Rank
#210
was #210
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
965
#210 of 249
OVR Grade
68.5
#210 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@Pasadena Memorial (0-0) 1052
41% (-3)
2
Humble Kingwood Park
34% (-6)
3
New Caney West Fork
27% (-9)
4
#13Dickinson (0-0) 2378
< 2% (-57)
5
@Deer Park (0-0) 1800
3% (-33)
6
Clear Falls (0-0) 1685
5% (-29)
8
@Clear Brook (0-0) 739
72% (+9)
9
Barbers Hill (0-0) 1822
3% (-34)
10
Clear Springs (0-0) 1594
7% (-25)
11
@Clear Creek (0-0) 1136
33% (-7)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 18-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 13
Gators
89.9
2378
0-0 0-0 6.7-0.3 > 98% D1
2 58
Eagles
81.5
1822
0-0 0-0 4.9-2.1 90% D2
3 63
Deer
81.1
1800
0-0 0-0 4.8-2.2 88.6% D1
4 78
Knights
79.4
1685
0-0 0-0 4.2-2.8 73.4% D2
5 94
Chargers
78
1594
0-0 0-0 3.8-3.2 46.1%
6 191
Wildcats
71.1
1136
0-0 0-0 1.9-5.2 < 2%
7 210
Falcons
68.5
965
0-0 0-0 1.2-5.8 < 2%
8 233
Wolverines
65.1
739
0-0 0-0 0.5-6.5 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Clear Lake’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2004
13-2
Rating 662 (89th)
#2 · 2008
8-3
Rating 611 (80th)
#3 · 2017
7-4
Rating 572 (69th)
#4 · 2018
6-6
Rating 545 (60th)
#5 · 2006
6-4
Rating 540 (59th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 1-9 1002 21.1 51.4 −30.3 1509 −8.7 +21.5 −30.2 745 −5.65 +0.01 −5.66 378(11th)
2024 3-7 1297 27.6 36.2 −8.6 1572 −1.0 +5.2 −6.2 1344 −3.94 +0.12 −4.06 484(38th)
2023 4-6 1352 22.9 22.7 +0.2 1479 −4.8 −3.7 −1.1 1473 −3.51 +0.25 −3.76 510(48th)
2022 5-5 1332 22.0 25.7 −3.7 1566 −4.2 −2.7 −1.4 1465 −2.11 +0.35 −2.46 500(44th)
2021 4-6 1264 29.3 37.4 −8.1 1490 +0.9 +7.7 −6.9 1329 −3.17 +0.35 −3.52 472(34th)
2020 2-5 1147 17.9 28.0 −10.1 1343 −11.1 +4.5 −15.6 1111 −3.08 +0.02 −3.10
2019 3-7 1168 21.8 32.4 −10.6 1526 −6.2 +2.9 −9.1 1272 −4.00 +0.35 −4.35 457(30th)
2018 6-6 1620 24.6 25.6 −1.0 1552 −4.0 −5.6 +1.5 1539 −2.05 +0.62 −2.67 545(60th)
2017 7-4 1685 33.5 25.8 +7.6 1512 +4.1 −3.7 +7.8 1694 −0.20 +2.38 −2.59 572(69th)
2016 3-7 1198 19.2 32.9 −13.7 1548 −6.9 +4.5 −11.4 1215 −3.70 +0.18 −3.88 453(29th)
2015 2-8 1066 14.5 41.6 −27.1 1458 −15.5 +12.8 −28.4 791 −5.30 +0.03 −5.32 384(12th)
2014 4-6 1318 24.2 29.0 −4.8 1412 −6.1 +1.3 −7.4 1316 −4.22 +0.23 −4.45 477(36th)
2013 6-4 1579 27.5 27.8 −0.3 1367 −2.5 +2.6 −5.0 1375 −1.39 +1.37 −2.76 510(48th)
2012 3-7 1051 24.0 33.5 −9.5 1397 −7.4 +6.1 −13.6 1160 −5.16 +0.09 −5.25 434(23rd)
2011 0-10 976 17.5 37.9 −20.4 1515 −8.8 +11.3 −20.1 998 −7.64 0.00 −7.64 408(17th)
2010 4-6 1530 28.6 31.6 −3.0 1629 +3.3 −0.4 +3.7 1594 −2.73 +0.74 −3.47 538(58th)
2009 3-7 1298 21.7 33.0 −11.3 1588 −3.2 +5.4 −8.6 1286 −4.72 +0.50 −5.23 475(35th)
2008 8-3 1868 25.1 14.9 +10.2 1584 +2.4 −11.2 +13.6 1839 +0.39 +1.64 −1.25 611(80th)
2007 6-4 1436 29.1 22.4 +6.7 1451 +4.7 0.0 +4.7 1618 −1.57 +0.94 −2.51 535(57th)
2006 6-4 1498 30.0 24.4 +5.6 1487 +5.1 +0.5 +4.5 1613 −1.43 +1.76 −3.19 540(59th)
2005 3-7 1273 20.3 22.5 −2.2 1474 −2.3 +1.9 −4.1 1397 −5.32 +0.30 −5.62 491(41st)
2004 13-2 2032 35.0 20.7 +14.3 1616 +14.3 −5.0 +19.3 1982 +3.08 +4.15 −1.07 662(89th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.